mesh/merge-gate pass: builds desk-channel, messenger, telegram → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compo…
- A comeback before the clearing was said rings when it is urgent now, and
says the reminder or escalation that was waiting when it cleared.
- Comebacks never said are counted apart, so "again, Nth time" counts only
what the operator was told; an urgent comeback after a said clearing rings
again in place of its message.
- telegram sends the new message before deleting the earlier one, so a
failed send leaves the operator a message.
- desk-channel keeps a machine's notification on record when its replace
fails, and says a message shown nowhere as failed.
- A store that cannot be read sends a new message instead of holding it.
- Tests for each, and for a reminder in a burst and a clearing the channel
could not take.
The operator stopped believing the mesh's notifications: one problem stood
twice on the desk (a reminder beside the message it followed, an escalation
then a reminder 31 s later), a unit failing again at each apply was said
again 22 times, and a question's buttons outlived it on a reminder the
ask's end never reached.
- messenger: a reminder or escalation is said in place of the problem's
message (Replace under its handle), alone, never as a digest line; a
problem first said in a digest gets its own message next time. A
reminder counts from when it was last said. A clearing is said once it
stays cleared 2 min (10 min once it came back); back before that, the
message continues without a word. Cleared before ever said and back:
said. An ask's expiry is said with its day.
- desk-channel: a send or show under a handle already shown replaces its
notification by the notifier's replace id.
- telegram: the same deletes the earlier message and sends the new one,
ringing as its kind rings; one it cannot delete loses its buttons.
The review found that a double tap while the phone's spinner turned would be
answered 'That answer was not taken', reading as if the approval failed; it is
now 'You already chose Approve at 13:30: recorded.' and does nothing more. The
fallback toast no longer promises a change that may not come (a stranger's
tap), the wait outlasts the router's 10 s wait for the controller's root word,
the channel's own refusals stay in the chat too, and the store's error words
stay in the journal.
At 13:30 on 2026-10-10 the operator approved two questions on Telegram and saw
nothing happen: the channel acknowledged each tap with no words, before the
router had judged it, and the edit that removed the buttons kept the question's
title, adding only a line under it that rings nothing.
The router now answers a chosen option in reply to the tap, once the ask's end
is recorded and before the question is edited: "You chose Approve: recorded,
and claude-code was told." (or, when the bus did not take the warrant, that it
is told when it does). A refusal already replied with its reason. Telegram
holds a tap's acknowledgement for the router's word and shows it as the tap's
own toast; a word with a body (a refusal's reason, Details) also stays in the
chat. Without a word in 8 seconds the toast claims nothing, and the late word
goes to the chat. A secret is never a toast.
An ask's own message, once answered, carries its outcome as its title:
"You chose Approve at 13:30 on Telegram · <headline>", then whether the asker
was told. The asks protocol carries no result back from the asker, so nothing
more is claimed of what it did.
The review of 2026-10-09 (M4): another holder of the token can change a message's words and leave its
buttons, so the operator taps Release under words that say something else. Each message's words are now
kept as a digest, per chat and message, and a tap on a message whose words differ, or that this channel
never showed, is refused on the phone and never said to the router.
The README says, as the operator directed (H5), that an approval from Telegram is meaningful only where
agents run under their own account without sudo, without the operator's X display, and with Telegram
Desktop's data readable by the operator alone; until then, approve from the phone.
jochen
jschoubben