mesh/delivery covered: a later merge that contains it was delivered: novox/mesh-catalog@1b7f79f76177 (merged as 73367192 into main, walk plan-17917161183…
The mesh proves which machine called, not which agent on it (hq issue 365), so a review verb could not tell a
reviewer from the author. Each version proposed is now judged by claude-code.claude_code_judge in a separate
call that sees only the record, the records it links and the rules: approve accepts (or asks the operator for a
needs-operator record), changes keeps it proposed with the findings for its author, and a judgement that cannot
be had or read leaves it proposed, says so, and never counts as approval.
The watch ran as root and wrote its verdict root's and 0600 into the state
directory, which the mesh gives to the account the runtime runs the bundle as;
knowledge_health could not open it, so the module read unhealthy with nothing
wrong. Run watch as that account, as zfs's watch does.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds mesh-issues, mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/delivery covered: a later merge that contains it was delivered: novox/mesh-catalog@a3f4387e2630 (merged as 300406e0 into main, walk plan-17917125412…
Both pin mesh-sdk/go at 4cf45b5 (mesh-sdk#20 merged). mesh-knowledge's one
reading of the caller, callerOf, now answers stdio.CallerOf, so a call on the
caller-named subject is recorded as its caller's bus user and any other as
unproven, never from the arguments.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds new: modules/mesh-knowledge, sent nowhere; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compo…
hq's words check never read a decision record, so a correction to any decision
of October 7 to 10 was refused for words it was allowed to write. The links an
accepted record holds are kept by its correction without being judged again.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds new: modules/mesh-knowledge, sent nowhere; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compo…
A revision came from anyone and a review was refused only to the first author,
so a co-writer could approve, and a record proposed before callers are proven
would later be reviewable by its own unproven author. Now a revision is taken
only from the proven author, a reserved number only from whoever reserved it,
and a review is refused from any writer of any version or for any record with
an unproven writer. The rules held records from no date, so a correction to an
older record was refused by rules hq never held it to; each dated rule now holds
from hq's own start date, and a new record cannot be dated before its
reservation. history and the question to ask are bounded like the other answers.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds new: modules/mesh-knowledge, sent nowhere; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compo…
An agent learns what a decision says only by reading whole records. This module
holds every decision record and research effort whole in a database in the store,
with clauses that carry their own status and source, typed links read from both
ends, and every version. It answers ask, get and holds within a stated bound, and
takes a record through reserve, propose (refused on any of the 29 per-record
rules), review by someone other than the author, and acceptance, on the
operator's proven warrant when the record needs it. The 4 whole-set rules make
the module unhealthy when they fail. The import reads hq at a commit through the
records module, never overwrites, and changes nothing when run again. Prose
decisions get drafted clauses that a second judgement must confirm before they
are served.
jschoubben
mesh-admin