Commit Graph
14 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben aa7c9e8924 A removal of a replacement names both fingerprints; the two-texts refusal names the places and the way out
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfFSnn24M3GcqttoU7i
2026-11-05 23:19:03 +01:00
jschoubben b3fc5b4580 A removal of an approved replacement names the registered text's fingerprint; the cases ADR 0642 cites are tests
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfFSnn24M3GcqttoU7i
2026-11-05 23:16:23 +01:00
jschoubben 657cb2b6c8 A section registered before the controller's terminal took over, or set there, is replaced or removed by a proposal the operator approves
It could not be changed at all: propose refused a name set there and never replaced one. The ask now says plainly that
it replaces or removes the registered section and binds its text's digest; on Approve every node renders the new text
in the place of the old (a removal leaves it out); a replacement keeps the section's own heading form (issue 340 note 14).

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfFSnn24M3GcqttoU7i
2026-11-05 22:14:55 +01:00
jschoubben a86e2ff1fc Mesh-catalog modules import operator-channel from its domain's contracts module and the registry seats from mesh-delivery's (K-4..K-20 first part; ADR 0634 §7, ADR 0636; issue 1966)
The group's module paths are placeholders the re-pin rewrites.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
2026-11-05 14:07:30 +01:00
jschoubben 9d83987815 Join item 1: the catalogue's modules take the router's ask from operator-channel's contract and client
mesh-sdk holds neither asks nor asker, nor the vault's answer types, and mesh-delivery's
sdk/views is mesh-sdk's go/views (a1-progress.md, the rewrite map for the join): thirteen
modules switch to the operatorchannel contract and client, mesh-sdk's channel package and
meshvault, with go.mod requiring each at the group pin (nats: meshbroker too). The gate
holds the checks mesh-sdk dropped (an ask's id is its key's asking, at least one option),
with a row that fails without them; claude-code refuses a router record whose times do
not parse, as its JSON decode did, with a row.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
2026-11-04 15:33:27 +01:00
jschoubben 8c07d2ef67 claude-code records its warrant through the hand-act seat, and the group's modules pin mesh-sdk at 8311ecb
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
2026-11-01 09:54:07 +01:00
jschoubben 6bfdbc5758 Take the build agent and the toolchain images out of the catalogue's prose, and refuse the word where it comes back outside the one module still naming it (issue 1295, E6) 2026-10-23 15:34:11 +02:00
jochen eadf301f9f An ask reads at a glance on the phone: a headline, a summary and its points, the rest in a note (issues 383 and 639)
The operator would not read the Telegram ask for ADR 0343: thirty plain lines, every clause on one, no bold,
no summary. A settings proposal was the same wall of text, its values masked so the approval was blind.

- messenger: an ask's message is the asker's headline and explanation alone; who asked and when, what each
  answer does, the expiry, where else it is answered and the asker's Details travel as the message's note
  (asks.Message.Note). Answered, the message is one line, "You chose Approve at 16:06 on Telegram ·
  <headline>". An explanation that does not read at a glance (asks.Glance) is shown and logged. On a kind
  that proves who answers, an ask's values are shown whole (asks.Ask.Whole), held to the secret rule alone
  (from the earlier work on issue 383, #178).
- telegram: every message in HTML, never reworded: the title bold, a key line monospace, the note apart in
  a collapsed blockquote; markup escaped. A tap is compared by its words, whitespace aside, and a message
  shown before is still compared by the digest it was kept under.
- desk-channel: the note follows the body.
- mesh-knowledge: a record that needs the operator carries a brief (headline, summary, at most three
  points), the 30th per-record rule; its ask shows the brief and never the clauses. An ask made before is
  composed again as it was asked (form), so its warrant still holds.
- claude-code: an instructions proposal's explanation is one summary line (the proposer's, or the
  module's), its text in the Details; a question's context is at most 300 characters and its recommendation
  one point. Older proposals and questions keep their form.

The SDK is pinned at mesh-sdk 9588871 (fix/639-an-ask-reads-at-a-glance), which adds Message.Note and
asks.Glance.
2026-10-13 17:16:50 +02:00
jochen e4e0ce7619 Say the router's refusal of a proposal only once its discard is kept (issue 589)
mesh/merge-gate head e4e0ce761901 merged into trunk 9c9a76d220f8 — pass: builds claude-code → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes …
mesh/repo-check head e4e0ce761901 merged into trunk 9c9a76d220f8 — pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-…
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
The refusal test failed on a loaded build agent: Propose returned on hearing the
refusal before HeardEnd had written the discard, so a reader right after saw
nothing decided. The question path keeps the same order.
2026-10-12 22:51:21 +02:00
jochen 774f18afcf claude-code: an ask taken after its refusal is still answered; the wait is bounded (issue 370 review)
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds claude-code → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
mesh/delivery delivered
A refusal heard on the decided subject is kept as heard, and a record of a person's choice found later is
still taken, so an ask the router's queue offered again is not lost in silence. A heard end must match the
proposal's ask; the wait stops reading at its deadline; the heard ends are forgotten when Propose returns.
2026-10-10 13:08:09 +02:00
jochen aafda6e870 claude-code: leave the judging of a proposal's channel to the router, and hear its refusal (hq ADR 0274)
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds claude-code → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
A module that only asks is issued no channel kinds, so the empty list was read as 'no channel proves its
sender' and every proposal was refused on the live mesh with Telegram linked. The router judges; Propose
waits for its word, and a refusal heard on the decided subject discards the proposal on every node.
2026-10-10 13:04:17 +02:00
jochen e4edab3fd0 claude-code: refuse variation selectors, blank letters and underlined or HTML headings; re-check every field at render; forget refusals the router no longer keeps (hq ADR 0274 review)
mesh/delivery delivered
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds claude-code → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
2026-10-10 03:55:45 +02:00
jochen 490f76e234 claude-code: hold the review's findings on proposed instructions (hq ADR 0274)
mesh/merge-gate fail: builds claude-code → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; a manifest the change touches fails the module check: claude-code uses the…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
An @ after any whitespace or punctuation, invisible and control characters, and top headings are refused;
every node judges a proposal record as the module would have made it before applying an approval, never
applies one older than its section's last change, never takes an unreadable record for an empty one, and
keys a node section by its nodes. The controller records the warrant from the router's word alone.
2026-10-10 03:52:03 +02:00
jochen 74e1be97ab claude-code: an agent proposes a shared instruction section, and every node takes it only on the operator's warrant (hq ADR 0274)
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
mesh/merge-gate fail: builds claude-code → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; a manifest the change touches fails the module check: claude-code uses the…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
Shared instructions were the terminal's alone since hq issue 340, because the tool runner cannot tell an
agent from the operator. The operator channel now proves who answered, so an agent may propose a section;
each node proves the router's warrant against the exact text itself and keeps what it approved in its own
file, so nothing written to the bus becomes active.
2026-10-10 03:40:48 +02:00