Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 3249b9a0cc The registry's public name is a second module beside the store, locked by the registry itself
The predecessor serves the registry under a public name, behind htpasswd basic auth, with a
twenty-gigabyte body limit for layer pushes. The mesh's registry has no name, no lock and no
limit — by design inside the mesh, where the private network is the boundary and every node
pulls without an account (hq ADR 0082). Taking the name over must not change that.

A route on `distribution` itself would: contributing a route is requiring one, and the store
is raised at genesis on a node with no proxy. So the public door is `distribution-gate`, a
second registry process on the same volume, behind the registry's own htpasswd (the
predecessor's realm, the predecessor's file, carried in with `secret accept`), with the
route and its limit. It requires the store's storage as a node-scoped provision, so it can
only land beside the store. The store's own door is untouched — no auth, no htpasswd — which
is what keeps the builder's pushes and every node's pulls working.

Both processes read the predecessor's configuration where it changed behaviour: delete
enabled, which tag retention depends on; no per-process descriptor cache, which two
processes over one store cannot share; the CORS headers for the retired interface dropped.

route-adapter writes the limit as the predecessor's own buffering middleware, named after
the router, only when asked for — and skips a route whose limit it cannot read rather than
carrying what the module said not to.

hq ADR 0082/0104, the registry hand-over.
2026-09-23 23:19:12 +02:00
jschoubben bd5b349a0d route-adapter: provide route by writing into the predecessor's proxy (hq ADR 0104)
A node being adopted cannot take a web module: every module reachable by
name requires route, the mesh's only provider of it binds the two public
ports, and the predecessor's proxy holds them and serves every public
name there. Stopping the predecessor to break the circle darkens every
name at once, with every certificate to re-obtain in the same window.

So this answers the same provision without binding anything. It provides
route and receives the same contributions file, and writes each
contribution as one route file where the predecessor's file provider
reads, naming the predecessor's own certificate resolver so no
certificate is asked for. It removes a file it wrote when its
contribution goes and never touches a file it did not write — the name
and a marker inside both have to say it is the mesh's.

A step, not a daemon: run-once, re-run by restart-on over the received
file and the settings. The predecessor's dynamic directory is a node
setting, because it is a fact about one machine.

Migration scaffolding with a stated end: assigned only on an adopted
node, deleted when the predecessor's proxy retires.
2026-09-23 00:11:21 +02:00