The whole-set rule cited ran only after acceptance: the review approved a
decision with no home and no record linking it, the rule then failed, and
the module's health turned red for a fault its author could only repair
after the fact. hq held the rule at the record's own merge. The review now
judges it ahead, before the judgement: such a decision stays proposed with
a changes finding naming the rule. It is not refused at propose, because
no record can link a number only reserved.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds claude-code, mesh-knowledge → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (…
A judgement over one bus call's 30 seconds is collected by its ticket from
claude-code, so an eleven-clause record can be reviewed; a proposal out of
review tries is told to the operator, not raised as the module's fault, so
it no longer holds the module's own rollouts.
mesh/delivery covered after its failure: a later walk that contains it was delivered: plan-1791744131193016639 (novox/mesh-catalog at 3fa07682 into main,…
A notice left open kept telling the operator a record was proposed and not in force after it was proposed again
or accepted, and a later version's notice merged into it.
A failed review's try count was already kept with the version, but not when it was asked again, so a 10-minute
pause read as a review lost to a restart; and after the last try only the history and the health said so.
The first live review sent research 046 back for a touches link the rules never named and a status proposed
that is the record's state, not the effort's. The rules now list LinkKinds, the one list propose holds a link
to, each with its meaning.
mesh/delivery covered: a later merge that contains it was delivered: novox/mesh-catalog@1b7f79f76177 (merged as 73367192 into main, walk plan-17917161183…
The mesh proves which machine called, not which agent on it (hq issue 365), so a review verb could not tell a
reviewer from the author. Each version proposed is now judged by claude-code.claude_code_judge in a separate
call that sees only the record, the records it links and the rules: approve accepts (or asks the operator for a
needs-operator record), changes keeps it proposed with the findings for its author, and a judgement that cannot
be had or read leaves it proposed, says so, and never counts as approval.
jochen
jschoubben