The official entrypoint re-executes itself as mongodb (uid 999) and only then reads
MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD_FILE, so a root-owned 0600 file is 'Permission denied' at line 83 and
the server never starts. secrets-owner is the mechanism ADR 0086 gives for exactly this.
From the survey of every env-file secret (ADR 0086, issue 041): amqp-ping,
minio, mongodb and grafana use the _FILE twin their software honours;
mesh-catalog and model-usage read DATABASE_URL_FILE (a file the mesh
templates, mounted where only the runtime reads it); grafana's secret files
belong to its own account. Two dead deliveries removed: a line nothing read
in amqp-email-forwarder, and mailu's secret.env on four containers that
never read it. The 25 exceptions that remain carry the surveyed reason —
convertible and awaiting a bed, convertible through a generated config file,
the application's own code, or not convertible.
ADR 0086. mesh-controller mounts its six own secrets and names them with
_FILE twins, so no credential of its own reaches its environment. The 35
containers that still read a secret through an env-file carry
secrets-in-environment with the reason; converting each where its software
accepts a path is the per-module work of issue 041.
keycloak, mailu, minio, mongodb, mssql, nextcloud, portainer, redis,
umami and verdaccio get the Dockerfile + build section the eight
buildable modules already had; their runtime containers name the
artifact instead of a placeholder digest.
One convention, settled (060's open question, informed by 061): the
runtime container runs serve mode with every serve-time entrypoint in
MESH_TOOL_MODULES — tools serve, events flow, and a provider's
provisioner reconciles in the same process with the broker connected.
postgres, gitea and lavinmq are retrofitted from args-run provisioners,
which served no tools and emitted lifecycle events nowhere.
route-proxy is deferred: its build context is the mesh-controller
repository, a cross-repo shape the build section cannot yet express.
The breadth install (catalogue-broad) surfaced two latent resolution bugs that
single-module compile checks never caught (compile != resolve):
1. postgres/redis/mongodb/minio served no "port", yet seven consumers
(baserow, letta, invoicing, gitea, umami, keycloak, nextcloud) reference
${bound:<provision>:port}. A binding auto-carries at/from/as; the port is the
provider's half of the answer and must be declared in `serves` (manifest.go:
"Serves is what a consumer needs to know ... a port, a path, a realm"). Added
port to each: postgres 5432, redis 6379, mongodb 27017, minio 9000. Without it
no DB consumer could resolve, let alone deploy.
2. baserow declared an empty contribution `contributes: {"redis-cache": {}}`.
redis's serves spec for the cache is empty (a cache takes no per-consumer
payload), so a consumer only `requires` it; an empty contribution is refused.
Dropped it (requires/binds/secrets unchanged).
Found by mesh-lab catalogue-broad; the same fixes are mirrored in that bed.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
Mirrors the proven catalog patterns field-for-field:
- lidarr -> the Servarr twin of radarr/sonarr (API v1, artist content); no
provisioner (it is a consumer app).
- mongodb -> postgres shape: mongodb-database provider, provisioner mints a
per-consumer db+user (ADR 0053), client shells to mongosh (no npm driver,
the psql convention).
- mssql -> postgres shape: mssql-database provider, sqlcmd client.
- mosquitto -> redis shape: mqtt-topic provider via the Dynamic Security
plugin, deliberately avoiding hal's password_file (that file is nox issue
011 exactly); provisioner mints a per-consumer MQTT client+role.
All four typecheck (strict, NodeNext) against the built @novox/mesh-sdk, and
their service images are digest-pinned to resolved registry digests. The
mesh-runtime-<mod> images keep the all-zeros placeholder the pipeline pins,
as postgres/redis do, and must bundle each module's CLI (mongosh/sqlcmd/
mosquitto_ctrl) as mesh-runtime-postgres bundles psql.
Not yet lab-verified: each module lists in-code what an integration test must
prove (auth model, provisioner reconcile, mosquitto dynsec bootstrap ordering).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
jschoubben