Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben f1212620e4 nats serves the mesh's existing broker certificate
The module mounted a TLS directory nothing fills, so the server could not start
on a mesh that was not raised by the genesis template. The mesh already has a
broker certificate every machine pins by fingerprint and the controller trusts;
serving the new bus with it means no pin changes when a machine moves and there
is no second certificate to be wrong about. No ca_file: the directory has none,
and a pinning client checks the leaf and nothing else.
2026-09-28 00:04:10 +02:00
jschoubben 3f0a174392 nats declares the upstream image it is built from
The recipe started FROM the upstream server's digest directly, and the build machine
refuses that: every base is declared under build.on and copied into the mesh's own
store before a build, so a build never reaches out to a registry the mesh does not
run (novox/hq ADR 0097). Found the first time the module was built on a real mesh.

Same digest, now declared as NATS_BASE and arriving as a build argument; the
Dockerfile says where it comes from and why the digest is the index's.
2026-09-27 23:40:16 +02:00
jschoubben a093c88c32 nats declares its own server settings, and where the mesh's users go
The split the controller now makes, from this side. The module's own
configuration — ports, TLS, JetStream — is a declared file resource, because those
are properties of this container and change when its image does. `bus-users` names
where the mesh writes every account and permission, in the same directory, and the
module's configuration includes it.

**Both files in one directory because they have to be.** An absolute include path
is resolved relative to the including file's directory: nats-server given
`include /etc/nats/accounts.conf` from /etc/nats-server/nats.conf looks for
/etc/nats-server/etc/nats/accounts.conf and refuses to start. Verified against the
server, and recorded in the configuration itself where somebody moving a file will
read it.

**`verify: true` is gone, and it was refusing every connection in the mesh.** It
makes the server demand a client certificate; a host pins this server's exact
certificate and authenticates with the password the mesh minted, and presents none.
Found by building this image and connecting to it as a host would.

The entrypoint now waits for both files and watches the mesh's half: the module's
own does not change without a new declaration, and that recreates the container
anyway. Verified end to end against this image — the mesh's user list rewritten,
the module noticing and reloading the server itself with no signal from outside,
and the connection the mesh already had still working afterwards.
2026-09-27 02:50:35 +02:00
jschoubben 86882cacd4 nats provides mesh-bus (novox/hq ADR 0120) 2026-09-26 21:17:21 +02:00
jschoubben 9b063a77b2 nats: the module, and an image that reloads in place
Step 1.1 and 1.2 of novox/hq ADR 0116. The server is a built artifact rather
than the upstream image directly, because it needs an entrypoint of its own:
the host can only recreate a container, and recreating the bus for every
permission change drops every connection and every in-flight ack. nats-server
reloads on SIGHUP by itself, so the config is mounted as a directory (not
digest-tracked, hq issue 103) and the entrypoint watches the one file.

Verified against the real server, not assumed: a user added to the config
connects, a revoked one is refused, both within one poll interval, with the
container's PID and restart count unchanged and "Reloaded: accounts" in its
log.

Two corrections found by checking rather than reading:
- the seat delivers nothing now (hq ADR 0117), and the controller's parser
  refused the manifest until it did — "nats claims mesh-broker, whose holder
  answers for amqp, and nats does not provide amqp"
- pinned to the multi-arch index digest; the first pin was the amd64
  manifest, which builds here and fails on any other architecture
2026-09-26 19:34:14 +02:00