mesh/check failed: g14: novox/mesh-catalog#434 does not merge into the trunk: files in conflict: merge-check.sh | c948f3a61c74 on 529c156f6407 | unit …
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds nats, sent nowhere; merging this needs a person's bus upgrade; 1 wait(s) for a person; every machine composes with the change …
nats_user_can read the user list on the machine. A list written is not a list the bus enforces until
the server reloads it: on 2026-10-09 the controller asked between the write and the reload's effect.
The answer now carries in_force — allowed in the file, and the server's config_load_time after the
file's write — with why when it is not, and anything not known is not in force.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds nats, sent nowhere; a bus step; 1 wait(s) for a person; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compo…
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds nats, sent nowhere; a bus step; 1 wait(s) for a person; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compo…
On 2.10.29 such a consumer was moved past a message now and then without
handing it over; the controller's events consumer has seven filters, and a
merge on the stream never reached it. The test reproduces the skip on 2.10.29
and keeps the image's release equal to the server it tests.
A Go bundle the runtime launches beside the nats module's server. It reads
the server's monitoring API and the composed user list — never a password
hash — and changes nothing. Reached directly when the endpoint is published,
through the container otherwise: its configuration binds monitoring to the
container's own loopback, so the published port answers nothing today.
jschoubben
jochen