The mesh proves which machine called, not which agent on it (hq issue 365), so a review verb could not tell a
reviewer from the author. Each version proposed is now judged by claude-code.claude_code_judge in a separate
call that sees only the record, the records it links and the rules: approve accepts (or asks the operator for a
needs-operator record), changes keeps it proposed with the findings for its author, and a judgement that cannot
be had or read leaves it proposed, says so, and never counts as approval.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds new: modules/mesh-knowledge, sent nowhere; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compo…
A revision came from anyone and a review was refused only to the first author,
so a co-writer could approve, and a record proposed before callers are proven
would later be reviewable by its own unproven author. Now a revision is taken
only from the proven author, a reserved number only from whoever reserved it,
and a review is refused from any writer of any version or for any record with
an unproven writer. The rules held records from no date, so a correction to an
older record was refused by rules hq never held it to; each dated rule now holds
from hq's own start date, and a new record cannot be dated before its
reservation. history and the question to ask are bounded like the other answers.
jschoubben