Register the repository mesh-delivery as an owner, so its issues can be located in it (issue 1133) #367

Merged
mesh-tools merged 1 commits from fix/1133-mesh-delivery-owner into main 2026-10-18 16:52:06 +00:00
Member

Fixes issue 1133.

The issue tracker's registered owners lacked the repository mesh-delivery, so the issues of design 47's release 1-2 for it (1134, 1135) were opened without located-in. The tracker runs with the manifest's owners default (no layer sets it on novox), so the default is the fix, not a node value.

  • modules/mesh-issues/module.json: config.owners.default += mesh-delivery.
  • modules/mesh-issues/files/settings.json: the template's owners += mesh-delivery.
  • manifest_test.go: 1133/AC1 (mesh-delivery registered, failed before the change) and 1133/AC2 (the default equals the template's list, shown to fail when only one changes).

1133/AC3 is proven live after the delivery: issue-tracker.set gives 1134 and 1135 located-in mesh-delivery.

Try: build-1792341602228455367 passed in 1m12s.
Delivery: moves mesh-issues on novox.

Reviewed-by: reviewer-1133@shanks at 26d81b09b5

Fixes issue 1133. The issue tracker's registered owners lacked the repository `mesh-delivery`, so the issues of design 47's release 1-2 for it (1134, 1135) were opened without `located-in`. The tracker runs with the manifest's `owners` default (no layer sets it on novox), so the default is the fix, not a node value. - `modules/mesh-issues/module.json`: `config.owners.default` += `mesh-delivery`. - `modules/mesh-issues/files/settings.json`: the template's owners += `mesh-delivery`. - `manifest_test.go`: 1133/AC1 (mesh-delivery registered, failed before the change) and 1133/AC2 (the default equals the template's list, shown to fail when only one changes). 1133/AC3 is proven live after the delivery: `issue-tracker.set` gives 1134 and 1135 `located-in` `mesh-delivery`. Try: build-1792341602228455367 passed in 1m12s. Delivery: moves mesh-issues on novox. Reviewed-by: reviewer-1133@shanks at 26d81b09b5e84be22c45d3b238065ecd47ac6bab
mesh-tools added 1 commit 2026-10-18 16:41:34 +00:00
Register the repository mesh-delivery as an owner, so its issues can be located in it (issue 1133)
mesh/merge-gate head 26d81b09b5e8 merged into trunk 72ad5ad138ce — pass: builds mesh-issues → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as…
mesh/repo-check head 26d81b09b5e8 merged into trunk 72ad5ad138ce — pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-…
mesh/delivery delivered
26d81b09b5
The tracker runs with the manifest's owners default; a test now holds the
default and the template's copy to one list.
Author
Member

Delivery novox/mesh-catalog@26d81b09b5e8 — delivered since 2026-10-18T16:56:41Z

Delivery plan — builds mesh-issues → novox; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-issues
  • novox: receives mesh-issues

Machines

  • mesh-issues on every machine running it: sent

Transitions

  • 2026-10-18 16:41 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#367's head announced
  • 2026-10-18 16:45 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
  • 2026-10-18 16:45 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
  • 2026-10-18 16:52 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
  • 2026-10-18 16:52 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
  • 2026-10-18 16:56 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says

The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.

<!-- mesh-delivery:view --> **Delivery** `novox/mesh-catalog@26d81b09b5e8` — **delivered** since 2026-10-18T16:56:41Z **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-issues → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-issues - novox: receives mesh-issues **Machines** - mesh-issues on every machine running it: sent **Transitions** - 2026-10-18 16:41 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#367's head announced - 2026-10-18 16:45 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit - 2026-10-18 16:45 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail - 2026-10-18 16:52 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move - 2026-10-18 16:52 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit - 2026-10-18 16:56 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
Author
Member

Merge check at 26d81b09
Judged: head 26d81b09b5e8 merged into trunk 72ad5ad138ce; read beside it: mesh-controller 48e9656c670b, mesh-controller-main 48e9656c670b, mesh-host 6469e8238443, mesh-tools 7412c5b6c9c5

  • mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-issues)
  • mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)

Delivery plan — builds mesh-issues → novox; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-issues
  • novox: receives mesh-issues
  • read by no module's build: modules/mesh-issues/cmd/mesh-issues/manifest_test.go

Run by the build seat on shanks as build-1792341697357673056 (builds --log build-1792341697357673056).

--- the gate: mesh-issues
mesh-issues: ok, invokes claude-code.claude_code_judge, seat:mesh-delivery.checks, seat:operator-channel.notify, gitea.gitea_pull_reviews, records.records_status, records.records_list, records.records_read, mesh-knowledge.knowledge_highest, keeps state issues, counters, grooming, reservations, keeps log changes (1024 MiB)
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 1 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-18T16:33:47Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-18T16:33:47Z

modules the change moves:
  - mesh-issues (changed)

machines:
  - a machine (f35): composes
  - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
  - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
  - a machine (yvbpsm): composes

a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-issues

notes:
  - modules/mesh-issues/cmd/mesh-issues/manifest_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words	0.003s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 53943 strings of 811 files
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome	0.013s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore	0.009s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir	0.018s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned	0.008s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets	0.014s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined	0.281s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config	0.015s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates	0.012s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths	0.006s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 61, as kept
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps	0.234s
testing modules/mesh-issues
ok  	mesh-issues/cmd/mesh-issues	11.854s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)
**Merge check** at `26d81b09` Judged: head `26d81b09b5e8` merged into trunk `72ad5ad138ce`; read beside it: mesh-controller `48e9656c670b`, mesh-controller-main `48e9656c670b`, mesh-host `6469e8238443`, mesh-tools `7412c5b6c9c5` - `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-issues) - `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript) **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-issues → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-issues - novox: receives mesh-issues - read by no module's build: modules/mesh-issues/cmd/mesh-issues/manifest_test.go Run by the build seat on shanks as `build-1792341697357673056` (`builds --log build-1792341697357673056`). ``` --- the gate: mesh-issues mesh-issues: ok, invokes claude-code.claude_code_judge, seat:mesh-delivery.checks, seat:operator-channel.notify, gitea.gitea_pull_reviews, records.records_status, records.records_list, records.records_read, mesh-knowledge.knowledge_highest, keeps state issues, counters, grooming, reservations, keeps log changes (1024 MiB) long-running resources without health: 0 files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0 1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here judging 1 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-18T16:33:47Z says they run composing every machine as the mesh is HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus composing every machine with the change HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-18T16:33:47Z modules the change moves: - mesh-issues (changed) machines: - a machine (f35): composes - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes - a machine (yvbpsm): composes a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-issues notes: - modules/mesh-issues/cmd/mesh-issues/manifest_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280) --- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.003s words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 53943 strings of 811 files ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.013s agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.009s mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.018s ~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.008s owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.014s secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.281s predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.015s config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.012s templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.006s paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go) long-running resources without health: 61, as kept ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.234s testing modules/mesh-issues ok mesh-issues/cmd/mesh-issues 11.854s --- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain) ```
mesh-tools merged commit afb94d925e into main 2026-10-18 16:52:06 +00:00
mesh-tools deleted branch fix/1133-mesh-delivery-owner 2026-10-18 16:52:07 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Reviewers
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: novox/mesh-catalog#367