Issue 1275's last criterion, 1275/AC6, as ADR 0442 (proposed, waiting for the operator's Approve) decides it, on top of #375 (AC1-AC5, delivered 18:47 UTC).
A member the merge tool refuses only because its verdict is out of date (main moved: the merge tool's own words at modules/gitea/merge.ts:121 and :147) is said as a warning while the fresh check runs, urgent if the group is not merged within 10 minutes of the first refusal (RefusedSince, kept across restarts). The pass still stops at the first refusal.
Every other refusal is urgent at once: the check that could not be asked (merge.ts:144), a missing or failed status, two causes in one refusal, words that cannot be classified.
A severity once urgent never steps back to a warning (ReadyRun.Urgent).
Tests in issue1275_test.go cite 1275/AC6: the first member (a), a later member after earlier merges (b), two causes (c), unknown words (d), the six refusals of merge.ts in their verbatim words (only :121 and :147 are warnings), and no step down. Merge check passed 18:55 UTC (3m20s). Its delivery moves mesh-delivery on novox.
Issue 1275's last criterion, 1275/AC6, as ADR 0442 (proposed, waiting for the operator's Approve) decides it, on top of #375 (AC1-AC5, delivered 18:47 UTC).
- A member the merge tool refuses only because its verdict is out of date (main moved: the merge tool's own words at modules/gitea/merge.ts:121 and :147) is said as a warning while the fresh check runs, urgent if the group is not merged within 10 minutes of the first refusal (RefusedSince, kept across restarts). The pass still stops at the first refusal.
- Every other refusal is urgent at once: the check that could not be asked (merge.ts:144), a missing or failed status, two causes in one refusal, words that cannot be classified.
- A severity once urgent never steps back to a warning (ReadyRun.Urgent).
Tests in issue1275_test.go cite 1275/AC6: the first member (a), a later member after earlier merges (b), two causes (c), unknown words (d), the six refusals of merge.ts in their verbatim words (only :121 and :147 are warnings), and no step down. Merge check passed 18:55 UTC (3m20s). Its delivery moves mesh-delivery on novox.
Reviewed-by: review-1275-ac6@shanks at a76910a0c03630636562277a66a1a8d0bdc7966a
mesh/merge-gate head a76910a0c036 merged into trunk 9efdd87a73a9 — pass: builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change …
mesh/repo-check head a76910a0c036 merged into trunk 9efdd87a73a9 — pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-…
Deliverynovox/mesh-catalog@a76910a0c036 — delivered since 2026-10-19T19:00:02Z
Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step
tier 0: mesh-delivery
novox: receives mesh-delivery
Machines
mesh-delivery on every machine running it: sent
Transitions
2026-10-19 18:52 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#376's head announced
2026-10-19 18:55 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
2026-10-19 18:55 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
2026-10-19 18:58 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
2026-10-19 18:58 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
2026-10-19 19:00 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says
The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.
<!-- mesh-delivery:view -->
**Delivery** `novox/mesh-catalog@a76910a0c036` — **delivered** since 2026-10-19T19:00:02Z
**Delivery plan** — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step
- tier 0: mesh-delivery
- novox: receives mesh-delivery
**Machines**
- mesh-delivery on every machine running it: sent
**Transitions**
- 2026-10-19 18:52 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#376's head announced
- 2026-10-19 18:55 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
- 2026-10-19 18:55 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
- 2026-10-19 18:58 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
- 2026-10-19 18:58 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
- 2026-10-19 19:00 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says
The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
Merge check at a76910a0
Judged: head a76910a0c036 merged into trunk 9efdd87a73a9; read beside it: mesh-controller 880207649956, mesh-controller-main 880207649956, mesh-host 2474bf28330f, mesh-tools 7412c5b6c9c5
mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-delivery)
mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step
tier 0: mesh-delivery
novox: receives mesh-delivery
read by no module's build: modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/events_test.go, modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/issue1275_test.go
Run by the build seat on shanks as build-1792435934137355266 (builds --log build-1792435934137355266).
--- the gate: mesh-delivery
note: mesh-delivery uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here
mesh-delivery: ok, 1 tool(s), invokes seat:mesh-controller.delivery-plan, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-check, seat:mesh-controller.deliver, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-backups-again, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-stop, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-walks, seat:mesh-controller.forget-checks, gitea.gitea_note_append, gitea.gitea_delivery_view, gitea.gitea_commit_status, gitea.gitea_commit_statuses, gitea.gitea_contains, gitea.gitea_open_pulls, gitea.gitea_merge_pull_request, gitea.gitea_add_comment, seat:operator-channel.notify, keeps state deliveries, groups, asked, pulls
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-19T18:51:04Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-19T18:51:04Z
machines:
- a machine (f35): composes
- holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
- holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
- a machine (yvbpsm): composes
a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-delivery
notes:
- modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/events_test.go and modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/issue1275_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.003s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 54485 strings of 814 files
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.014s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.009s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.018s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.008s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.014s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.266s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.015s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.012s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.006s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 61, as kept
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.230s
testing modules/mesh-delivery
ok mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery 13.019s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)
**Merge check** at `a76910a0`
Judged: head `a76910a0c036` merged into trunk `9efdd87a73a9`; read beside it: mesh-controller `880207649956`, mesh-controller-main `880207649956`, mesh-host `2474bf28330f`, mesh-tools `7412c5b6c9c5`
- `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-delivery)
- `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
**Delivery plan** — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step
- tier 0: mesh-delivery
- novox: receives mesh-delivery
- read by no module's build: modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/events_test.go, modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/issue1275_test.go
Run by the build seat on shanks as `build-1792435934137355266` (`builds --log build-1792435934137355266`).
```
--- the gate: mesh-delivery
note: mesh-delivery uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here
mesh-delivery: ok, 1 tool(s), invokes seat:mesh-controller.delivery-plan, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-check, seat:mesh-controller.deliver, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-backups-again, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-stop, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-walks, seat:mesh-controller.forget-checks, gitea.gitea_note_append, gitea.gitea_delivery_view, gitea.gitea_commit_status, gitea.gitea_commit_statuses, gitea.gitea_contains, gitea.gitea_open_pulls, gitea.gitea_merge_pull_request, gitea.gitea_add_comment, seat:operator-channel.notify, keeps state deliveries, groups, asked, pulls
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-19T18:51:04Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-19T18:51:04Z
machines:
- a machine (f35): composes
- holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
- holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
- a machine (yvbpsm): composes
a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-delivery
notes:
- modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/events_test.go and modules/mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery/issue1275_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.003s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 54485 strings of 814 files
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.014s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.009s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.018s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.008s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.014s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.266s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.015s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.012s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.006s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 61, as kept
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.230s
testing modules/mesh-delivery
ok mesh-delivery/cmd/mesh-delivery 13.019s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)
```
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Issue 1275's last criterion, 1275/AC6, as ADR 0442 (proposed, waiting for the operator's Approve) decides it, on top of #375 (AC1-AC5, delivered 18:47 UTC).
Tests in issue1275_test.go cite 1275/AC6: the first member (a), a later member after earlier merges (b), two causes (c), unknown words (d), the six refusals of merge.ts in their verbatim words (only :121 and :147 are warnings), and no step down. Merge check passed 18:55 UTC (3m20s). Its delivery moves mesh-delivery on novox.
Reviewed-by: review-1275-ac6@shanks at
a76910a0c0Delivery
novox/mesh-catalog@a76910a0c036— delivered since 2026-10-19T19:00:02ZDelivery plan — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step
Machines
Transitions
The commit's note under
refs/notes/mesh-plankeeps every transition:git log --notes=mesh-plan.Merge check at
a76910a0Judged: head
a76910a0c036merged into trunk9efdd87a73a9; read beside it: mesh-controller880207649956, mesh-controller-main880207649956, mesh-host2474bf28330f, mesh-tools7412c5b6c9c5mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-delivery)mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery → novox; no bus step
Run by the build seat on shanks as
build-1792435934137355266(builds --log build-1792435934137355266).