The mail web client: mesh-mail-web, and mesh-mail's views for it (design 59 milestone 1) #377

Merged
mesh-tools merged 18 commits from feat/mail-webclient into main 2026-10-19 21:27:33 +00:00
Member

Design 59 milestone 1 (the mail web client), one release of mesh-catalog. In a browser on the laptop and the workstation, the operator signs in and browses, searches and reads every account's mail with its attachments, and writes a mail that goes out on their Approve.

  • mesh-mail: the account and newest-mail buckets a view reads (issues 1255, 1282); mail_send_status answers only its caller (1261).
  • mesh-mail-web, a new module: its manifest (1262), its web endpoint on the internal name with a content security policy (1283), Keycloak sign-in (1263) with a session-bound form token (1284), accounts, folders and mails (1264), search (1265), a mail and its attachments (1266), writing a mail (1267).
  • The acceptance test that starts mesh-mail-web whole against a real bus (1268), on a runtime player for a bundle's integration test (1285).

After delivery mesh-mail-web is built and assigned nowhere; its reach, assignment, operators and mesh-mail grant are four separate Approves (design 59 §7).

Issues: 1255, 1261, 1262, 1263, 1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1282, 1283, 1284, 1285. Opened during review, outside this milestone: 1310, 1312, 1313, 1319.

Tried before opening: build-1792444785063783501 passed at 9f3a8ee3 (integration tests included).

Reviewed-by: review-webclient@g14 at 9f3a8ee391

Design 59 milestone 1 (the mail web client), one release of mesh-catalog. In a browser on the laptop and the workstation, the operator signs in and browses, searches and reads every account's mail with its attachments, and writes a mail that goes out on their Approve. - mesh-mail: the account and newest-mail buckets a view reads (issues 1255, 1282); `mail_send_status` answers only its caller (1261). - mesh-mail-web, a new module: its manifest (1262), its web endpoint on the internal name with a content security policy (1283), Keycloak sign-in (1263) with a session-bound form token (1284), accounts, folders and mails (1264), search (1265), a mail and its attachments (1266), writing a mail (1267). - The acceptance test that starts mesh-mail-web whole against a real bus (1268), on a runtime player for a bundle's integration test (1285). After delivery mesh-mail-web is built and assigned nowhere; its reach, assignment, operators and mesh-mail grant are four separate Approves (design 59 §7). Issues: 1255, 1261, 1262, 1263, 1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1282, 1283, 1284, 1285. Opened during review, outside this milestone: 1310, 1312, 1313, 1319. Tried before opening: build-1792444785063783501 passed at 9f3a8ee3 (integration tests included). Reviewed-by: review-webclient@g14 at 9f3a8ee391013593c378a1080d4ba998cc798bdf
mesh-tools added 18 commits 2026-10-19 21:21:42 +00:00
Library choice: golang.org/x/oauth2 for the code exchange, github.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3 for the ID token's
verification (issuer, audience, expiry, signature from the issuer's JWKS).
Accounts bucket fixture (accountBucketValue/accountBucketFolder) copied from mesh-mail's own
modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/mirror.go AccountValue/AccountFolderValue (issue 1255); mesh-mail-web is its
own Go module, so this is a copy, not an import.
Wires 1284's per-session token into the real write form and its real POST /send; adds tests for 1284/AC1-AC4
against that real page and handler, beside this issue's own AC1-AC4.
Plays the SDK's own runtime protocol (initialize, tools/list, tools/call, the bundle's mesh/ask and
mesh/state.<verb>) against mesh-mail-web's real built binary, from stdio.go and state.go's own source. The
account bucket is a real JetStream key-value bucket (mesh-mail_accounts, named as mesh-mail's own
acceptance_integration_test.go names a module's state); its fixture (accountBucketValue/accountBucketFolder)
is accounts.go's own, itself copied from mesh-mail's mirror.go AccountValue (issue 1255, 1264).

Build tag integration; compiles under go vet -tags integration ./...; never run here (go test -tags
integration is this batch's hard rule) — the lead's try runs it.
Four scenarios, entered only through HTTP with Host mail.<node>.internal as a browser would, against the
built mesh-mail-web, a stand-in identity provider (auth_test.go's own fakeIssuer, reused) and a real account
bucket holding granted account a and ungranted account c: sign-in redirects, 403s and the session cookie's
attributes; the 404 for another host; browsing and a send followed to sent, only the five mail verbs asked,
account c never shown, paging by date, no database or extra writable directory; a mail's script and remote
image shown as text, an attachment downloaded with nosniff, and the CSP on every answer.

Build tag integration; compiles under go vet -tags integration ./...; never run here.
The controller refused the manifest: config.operators declared type "array" (not one of the controller's
five types, novox/hq ADR 0348 §4 — the word is "list"), and the bundle's env word MESH_MAIL_WEB_LISTEN said
${port:web} (a bundle's word takes the port NUMBER a listens entry gives, novox/hq ADR 0192; mesh-controller
internal/catalogue/port_into.go portsFilledInto matches it against listens[].Port, never an endpoint's
label). Fixed to type "list" and ${port:8099} (the listens entry's own port). main.go and the integration
harness already read/write a plain port number, so neither needed a change. manifest_test.go now asserts
both: config.operators.Type == "list", and the listen word equals ${port:<the listens entry's port>};
confirmed each independently fails against the old values before this fix.
A failed subtest fails its parent, so TestHarnessFailsTheTestWhenTheBundleAsksSomethingUnknown could never
pass the way it was written (try 2's finding). The player now reports through askFailer (Helper, Errorf);
every other test keeps passing its own *testing.T, which satisfies it already. That one test gives a
recorder instead, and asserts it holds exactly one message naming seat:mail-store.accounts, and that
mail-webclient.status's own answer shows the ask got an error back. Checked: no other integration test uses
the same deliberate-subtest-failure pattern (grepped t.Run).
Follow real links instead of building them, and check the CSP on every answer (issue 1268)
mesh/merge-gate head 9f3a8ee39101 merged into trunk 66aa204f6779 — pass: builds mesh-mail, new: modules/mesh-mail-web → novox; no bus step; every machine c…
mesh/repo-check head 9f3a8ee39101 merged into trunk 66aa204f6779 — pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-…
mesh/delivery delivered
9f3a8ee391
Author
Member

Delivery novox/mesh-catalog@9f3a8ee39101 — delivered since 2026-10-19T21:30:31Z

Delivery plan — builds mesh-mail, new: modules/mesh-mail-web → novox; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-mail
  • novox: receives mesh-mail

Machines

  • mesh-mail on every machine running it: sent

Transitions

  • 2026-10-19 21:21 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#377's head announced
  • 2026-10-19 21:24 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
  • 2026-10-19 21:24 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
  • 2026-10-19 21:27 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
  • 2026-10-19 21:27 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
  • 2026-10-19 21:30 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says

The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.

<!-- mesh-delivery:view --> **Delivery** `novox/mesh-catalog@9f3a8ee39101` — **delivered** since 2026-10-19T21:30:31Z **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-mail, new: modules/mesh-mail-web → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-mail - novox: receives mesh-mail **Machines** - mesh-mail on every machine running it: sent **Transitions** - 2026-10-19 21:21 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#377's head announced - 2026-10-19 21:24 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit - 2026-10-19 21:24 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail - 2026-10-19 21:27 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move - 2026-10-19 21:27 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit - 2026-10-19 21:30 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
Author
Member

Merge check at 9f3a8ee3
Judged: head 9f3a8ee39101 merged into trunk 66aa204f6779; read beside it: mesh-controller caa3fc899501, mesh-controller-main caa3fc899501, mesh-host 2474bf28330f, mesh-tools 7412c5b6c9c5

  • mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-mail, new:modules/mesh-mail-web)
  • mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)

Delivery plan — builds mesh-mail, new: modules/mesh-mail-web → novox; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-mail
  • novox: receives mesh-mail
  • read by no module's build: modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/imap_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/mirror_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/send_test.go

Run by the build seat on ace as build-1792444910156646010 (builds --log build-1792444910156646010).

--- the gate: mesh-mail, new:modules/mesh-mail-web
note: mesh-mail uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here
mesh-mail: ok, 11 tool(s), keeps state sends, accounts, mails, ready: keep by unit every 30s; watch by its tool mail_health every 1m0s; send by unit every 30s
mesh-mail-web: ok, 3 tool(s), invokes seat:mail-store.accounts, seat:mail-store.search, seat:mail-store.read, seat:mail-store.send, seat:mail-store.send-status, reads mesh-mail.accounts
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
2 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 2 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-19T21:17:52Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-19T21:17:52Z

modules the change moves:
  - mesh-mail (changed)
  - mesh-mail-web (added)

machines:
  - a machine (f35): composes
  - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
  - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
  - a machine (yvbpsm): composes

a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-mail

notes:
  - mesh-mail-web could not be tried on a machine: these assignments cannot be applied: - 2 providers of "route", wanted by mesh-mail-web — say which with `pin f35 route <node> <module>`: idt/route-proxy, ygcyr/route-proxy
  - modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/imap_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/mirror_test.go and modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/send_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words	0.003s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 54926 strings of 827 files
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome	0.012s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore	0.008s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir	0.016s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned	0.008s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets	0.012s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined	0.288s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config	0.015s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates	0.011s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths	0.005s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 61, as kept
ok  	git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps	0.234s
testing modules/mesh-mail
ok  	mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail	8.268s
?   	mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/internal/secret	[no test files]
testing modules/mesh-mail-web
ok  	mesh-mail-web/cmd/mesh-mail-web	8.640s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)
**Merge check** at `9f3a8ee3` Judged: head `9f3a8ee39101` merged into trunk `66aa204f6779`; read beside it: mesh-controller `caa3fc899501`, mesh-controller-main `caa3fc899501`, mesh-host `2474bf28330f`, mesh-tools `7412c5b6c9c5` - `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: mesh-mail, new:modules/mesh-mail-web) - `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript) **Delivery plan** — builds mesh-mail, new: modules/mesh-mail-web → novox; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-mail - novox: receives mesh-mail - read by no module's build: modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/imap_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/mirror_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/send_test.go Run by the build seat on ace as `build-1792444910156646010` (`builds --log build-1792444910156646010`). ``` --- the gate: mesh-mail, new:modules/mesh-mail-web note: mesh-mail uses the seat "operator-channel", which no module declares and the mesh does not define among the manifests given; registration judges it against the whole catalogue, and passing the declaring module's manifest too judges it here mesh-mail: ok, 11 tool(s), keeps state sends, accounts, mails, ready: keep by unit every 30s; watch by its tool mail_health every 1m0s; send by unit every 30s mesh-mail-web: ok, 3 tool(s), invokes seat:mail-store.accounts, seat:mail-store.search, seat:mail-store.read, seat:mail-store.send, seat:mail-store.send-status, reads mesh-mail.accounts long-running resources without health: 0 files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0 2 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here judging 2 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-19T21:17:52Z says they run composing every machine as the mesh is HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus composing every machine with the change HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus the bus's user list leaves out 6 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-19T21:17:52Z modules the change moves: - mesh-mail (changed) - mesh-mail-web (added) machines: - a machine (f35): composes - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes - a machine (yvbpsm): composes a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-mail notes: - mesh-mail-web could not be tried on a machine: these assignments cannot be applied: - 2 providers of "route", wanted by mesh-mail-web — say which with `pin f35 route <node> <module>`: idt/route-proxy, ygcyr/route-proxy - modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/imap_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/manifest_test.go, modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/mirror_test.go and modules/mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/send_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280) --- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.003s words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 54926 strings of 827 files ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.012s agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.008s mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.016s ~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.008s owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.012s secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.288s predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.015s config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved) ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.011s templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.005s paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go) long-running resources without health: 61, as kept ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.234s testing modules/mesh-mail ok mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail 8.268s ? mesh-mail/cmd/mesh-mail/internal/secret [no test files] testing modules/mesh-mail-web ok mesh-mail-web/cmd/mesh-mail-web 8.640s --- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain) ```
mesh-tools merged commit 954f84ea19 into main 2026-10-19 21:27:33 +00:00
mesh-tools deleted branch feat/mail-webclient 2026-10-19 21:27:34 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Reviewers
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: novox/mesh-catalog#377