What: when a delivery group is about to ask the operator's Approve and a member's own mesh/repo-check is pending or missing (a sibling's new head marked it out of date, or no status was written) while its gate is fine, mesh-delivery-gate now asks that member's own check, the same way it already does after a merge refusal (issues 1049, 1276). One own ask is in flight at a time: the mark is cleared when a verdict at the member's own head arrives, so the check is asked again after a later sibling move.
Why: the composed check does not run a member's repo-check, so nothing asked it again; the group stayed held (unasked) and the Approve was never asked. ADR 0382 section 2 keeps each member's own check required, so it must run again by itself.
How it is checked: unit tests in modules/mesh-delivery-gate/issue1792_test.go, each failing before its change with no own check asked: TestAGroupHeldBeforeItsAskOnAMembersOwnPendingRepoCheckAsksThatCheckOnce, TestAMembersOwnCheckIsAskedAgainWhenASecondSiblingHeadPutsItOutOfDate, TestAMergeRefusedForOwnPendingAfterAnAnsweredOwnAskAsksItAgain; the whole unit suite and go vet -tags integration pass; mesh-controller.try build-1792617399924386348 on d2faada61b passed (merge-check.sh go and typescript, 1m29s). Follow-up found in review: issue 1794.
Fixes novox/hq issues 1792 and 1793.
What: when a delivery group is about to ask the operator's Approve and a member's own mesh/repo-check is pending or missing (a sibling's new head marked it out of date, or no status was written) while its gate is fine, mesh-delivery-gate now asks that member's own check, the same way it already does after a merge refusal (issues 1049, 1276). One own ask is in flight at a time: the mark is cleared when a verdict at the member's own head arrives, so the check is asked again after a later sibling move.
Why: the composed check does not run a member's repo-check, so nothing asked it again; the group stayed held (unasked) and the Approve was never asked. ADR 0382 section 2 keeps each member's own check required, so it must run again by itself.
How it is checked: unit tests in modules/mesh-delivery-gate/issue1792_test.go, each failing before its change with no own check asked: TestAGroupHeldBeforeItsAskOnAMembersOwnPendingRepoCheckAsksThatCheckOnce, TestAMembersOwnCheckIsAskedAgainWhenASecondSiblingHeadPutsItOutOfDate, TestAMergeRefusedForOwnPendingAfterAnAnsweredOwnAskAsksItAgain; the whole unit suite and go vet -tags integration pass; mesh-controller.try build-1792617399924386348 on d2faada61bf3 passed (merge-check.sh go and typescript, 1m29s). Follow-up found in review: issue 1794.
Reviewed-by: reviewer-1792@shanks at d2faada61bf30e5354c0f90d78b53e372a9ad13c
Deliverynovox/mesh-catalog@d2faada61bf3 — delivered since 2026-10-21T21:39:32Z
Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery-gate → novox; no bus step
tier 0: mesh-delivery-gate
novox: receives mesh-delivery-gate
Machines
mesh-delivery-gate on every machine running it: sent
Transitions
2026-10-21 21:16 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#424's head announced
2026-10-21 21:25 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
2026-10-21 21:25 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
2026-10-21 21:38 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
2026-10-21 21:38 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
2026-10-21 21:39 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says
The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.
<!-- mesh-delivery:view -->
**Delivery** `novox/mesh-catalog@d2faada61bf3` — **delivered** since 2026-10-21T21:39:32Z
**Delivery plan** — builds mesh-delivery-gate → novox; no bus step
- tier 0: mesh-delivery-gate
- novox: receives mesh-delivery-gate
**Machines**
- mesh-delivery-gate on every machine running it: sent
**Transitions**
- 2026-10-21 21:16 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-catalog#424's head announced
- 2026-10-21 21:25 proposed → checked (checked): a verdict names this commit and the trunk's head as its trunk commit
- 2026-10-21 21:25 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
- 2026-10-21 21:38 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
- 2026-10-21 21:38 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path — not a failed walk that carried a later commit for it, after which it waits for a walk of its own commit
- 2026-10-21 21:39 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done, carrying its own commit: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says
The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
mesh/merge-gate head d2faada61bf3 merged into trunk 379317589488 — pass: builds mesh-delivery-gate → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the ch…
mesh/repo-check head d2faada61bf3 merged into trunk 379317589488 — pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-…
Merge check at d2faada6
Judged: head d2faada61bf3 merged into trunk 379317589488; read beside it: mesh-controller 1f3fdf311167, mesh-controller-main a3c965b9a0d5, mesh-host 4065b45ae84f, mesh-tools e0fadc43d9dd
mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (run 2) (modules: mesh-delivery-gate)
mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript) (run 2)
Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery-gate → novox; no bus step
tier 0: mesh-delivery-gate
novox: receives mesh-delivery-gate
read by no module's build: modules/mesh-delivery-gate/cmd/mesh-delivery-gate/issue1792_test.go
Run by the build seat on ace as build-1792617404345291650 (builds --log build-1792617404345291650).
restarted: handed out 2 times; an earlier hand-out did not finish here, so this run started from the beginning
--- the gate: mesh-delivery-gate
mesh-delivery-gate: ok, 1 tool(s), invokes seat:mesh-controller.deliver, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-stop, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-backups-again, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-walks, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-check, seat:mesh-controller.forget-checks, seat:mesh-controller.plans, gitea.gitea_commit_statuses, gitea.gitea_contains, gitea.gitea_open_pulls, keeps state deliveries, groups, pulls, asks, merges, owed, source, reads mesh-delivery.deliveries, mesh-delivery.groups, mesh-delivery.pulls, mesh-delivery-teller.answers, mesh-controller.assignments, node-engine.have
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-21T21:19:44Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-21T21:19:44Z
machines:
- a machine (f35): composes
- holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
- holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
- a machine (yvbpsm): composes
a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-delivery-gate
notes:
- modules/mesh-delivery-gate/cmd/mesh-delivery-gate/issue1792_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.004s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 59608 strings of 917 files
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/toolchains 0.009s
toolchains: go, nodejs and npm are declared only by their owners
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.012s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.009s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.017s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.008s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.014s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.276s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.032s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.011s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.005s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 59, as kept
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.236s
testing modules/mesh-delivery-gate
ok mesh-delivery-gate/cmd/mesh-delivery-gate 17.068s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)
**Merge check** at `d2faada6`
Judged: head `d2faada61bf3` merged into trunk `379317589488`; read beside it: mesh-controller `1f3fdf311167`, mesh-controller-main `a3c965b9a0d5`, mesh-host `4065b45ae84f`, mesh-tools `e0fadc43d9dd`
- `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (run 2) (modules: mesh-delivery-gate)
- `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript) (run 2)
**Delivery plan** — builds mesh-delivery-gate → novox; no bus step
- tier 0: mesh-delivery-gate
- novox: receives mesh-delivery-gate
- read by no module's build: modules/mesh-delivery-gate/cmd/mesh-delivery-gate/issue1792_test.go
Run by the build seat on ace as `build-1792617404345291650` (`builds --log build-1792617404345291650`).
```
restarted: handed out 2 times; an earlier hand-out did not finish here, so this run started from the beginning
--- the gate: mesh-delivery-gate
mesh-delivery-gate: ok, 1 tool(s), invokes seat:mesh-controller.deliver, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-stop, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-backups-again, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-walks, seat:mesh-controller.delivery-check, seat:mesh-controller.forget-checks, seat:mesh-controller.plans, gitea.gitea_commit_statuses, gitea.gitea_contains, gitea.gitea_open_pulls, keeps state deliveries, groups, pulls, asks, merges, owed, source, reads mesh-delivery.deliveries, mesh-delivery.groups, mesh-delivery.pulls, mesh-delivery-teller.answers, mesh-controller.assignments, node-engine.have
long-running resources without health: 0
files asking for a setting without saying whether it is trusted: 0
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-21T21:19:44Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
composing every machine with the change
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on f35; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/f35/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on idt; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/idt/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on ygcyr; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner, mesh-provisioner-client, nats — own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus; own/ygcyr/nats/broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
the bus's user list leaves out 8 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, ygcyr.mesh-mail.send, ygcyr.only-office.converter, node.yvbpsm, yvbpsm.brother.device. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
HELD: the vault did not answer for the core's credentials on yvbpsm; sealed by the controller until the vault holds it: mesh-provisioner-client — own/yvbpsm/mesh-provisioner-client/provisioner-broker: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-21T21:19:44Z
machines:
- a machine (f35): composes
- holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
- holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-config, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-provisioner, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
- a machine (yvbpsm): composes
a merge would rebuild 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s): mesh-delivery-gate
notes:
- modules/mesh-delivery-gate/cmd/mesh-delivery-gate/issue1792_test.go read by no module's build, and rebuild nothing (issue 280)
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/words 0.004s
words: 12 retired words and 70 daemons' lines, none in the 59608 strings of 917 files
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/toolchains 0.009s
toolchains: go, nodejs and npm are declared only by their owners
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/agenthome 0.012s
agent-home: no archive and no file written into under the agent's home
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/mailstore 0.009s
mail-store: claimed only by mesh-mail
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/sshdir 0.017s
~/.ssh: named only by ssh-client
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/owned 0.008s
owned paths: every directory and archive says how it treats unknown files; no module declares inside another's directory
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/secrets 0.014s
secrets: no setting can replace a vault secret in a mergeable file (1 known, nested)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/predefined 0.276s
predefined.json: 2 key(s), none removed that a module names
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/config 0.032s
config: no moved module says settings, takes-settings or ${setting:<key>}, or takes a whole layer (0 not yet moved)
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/templates 0.011s
templates: no module keeps a file's text inline but the 0 listed
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/paths 0.005s
paths: no module names another's state on its machine (3 known, listed to go)
long-running resources without health: 59, as kept
ok git.novox.be/novox/mesh-catalog/checks/deps 0.236s
testing modules/mesh-delivery-gate
ok mesh-delivery-gate/cmd/mesh-delivery-gate 17.068s
--- its merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript toolchain)
```
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Fixes novox/hq issues 1792 and 1793.
What: when a delivery group is about to ask the operator's Approve and a member's own mesh/repo-check is pending or missing (a sibling's new head marked it out of date, or no status was written) while its gate is fine, mesh-delivery-gate now asks that member's own check, the same way it already does after a merge refusal (issues 1049, 1276). One own ask is in flight at a time: the mark is cleared when a verdict at the member's own head arrives, so the check is asked again after a later sibling move.
Why: the composed check does not run a member's repo-check, so nothing asked it again; the group stayed held (unasked) and the Approve was never asked. ADR 0382 section 2 keeps each member's own check required, so it must run again by itself.
How it is checked: unit tests in modules/mesh-delivery-gate/issue1792_test.go, each failing before its change with no own check asked: TestAGroupHeldBeforeItsAskOnAMembersOwnPendingRepoCheckAsksThatCheckOnce, TestAMembersOwnCheckIsAskedAgainWhenASecondSiblingHeadPutsItOutOfDate, TestAMergeRefusedForOwnPendingAfterAnAnsweredOwnAskAsksItAgain; the whole unit suite and go vet -tags integration pass; mesh-controller.try build-1792617399924386348 on
d2faada61bpassed (merge-check.sh go and typescript, 1m29s). Follow-up found in review: issue 1794.Reviewed-by: reviewer-1792@shanks at
d2faada61bDelivery
novox/mesh-catalog@d2faada61bf3— delivered since 2026-10-21T21:39:32ZDelivery plan — builds mesh-delivery-gate → novox; no bus step
Machines
Transitions
The commit's note under
refs/notes/mesh-plankeeps every transition:git log --notes=mesh-plan.Merge check at
d2faada6Judged: head
d2faada61bf3merged into trunk379317589488; read beside it: mesh-controller1f3fdf311167, mesh-controller-maina3c965b9a0d5, mesh-host4065b45ae84f, mesh-toolse0fadc43d9ddmesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (run 2) (modules: mesh-delivery-gate)mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript) (run 2)Delivery plan — builds mesh-delivery-gate → novox; no bus step
Run by the build seat on ace as
build-1792617404345291650(builds --log build-1792617404345291650).