while-stopped names the container as the machine knows it (hq ADR 0189)

A module names its own resources locally; a declaration names them under the
module. restart-on and reload-on are rewritten for exactly that reason and
while-stopped was not, so the store's step said it held "store" still while
the machine's container is "distribution.store".

The host refuses a declaration naming a container it does not have — whole.
So novox took nothing at all, on every push, from 04:15 until this. The
machine was never damaged: refusing whole is what kept it serving.

Both sides' tests passed throughout. The controller's read manifests, the
host's read hand-written declarations with bare ids, and nothing composed one
and judged the result. That test now exists.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-04 04:18:22 +02:00
parent 17b8f14fe1
commit 1363a2fe27
2 changed files with 65 additions and 0 deletions
+9
View File
@@ -907,6 +907,15 @@ func (r Resolution) compose(with Rendering, owner map[string]string,
if renamed := reflectsRenamed(m.Module, resource["reload-on"]); renamed != nil {
copied["reload-on"] = renamed
}
// And which of its module's containers a scheduled step holds still (novox/hq ADR 0189).
// **The loudest of the three when it is missed.** An unprefixed `restart-on` matches
// nothing and a service quietly never restarts; an unprefixed `while-stopped` names a
// container the declaration does not contain, and the host refuses the whole
// declaration — so the machine takes nothing at all, for every push, until this is
// right. That is what it did on the control node (2026-10-04).
if renamed := reflectsRenamed(m.Module, resource[WhileStopped]); renamed != nil {
copied[WhileStopped] = renamed
}
// And what a process replaces (novox/hq issue 213): a resource of this module's that it
// no longer declares, named as the host recorded it, or the host hands nothing over and
// removes it first.