Two consumers may share a name; they must not share a delivery subject

novox/hq 04-ISSUES/146. A push consumer delivers onto an ordinary subject and
everything subscribed to it gets a copy. The controller holds a consumer called
'controller' on CONTROL and another called 'controller' on EVENTS, and both were
given _DELIVER.controller — so the one process, holding both subscriptions,
acted on every message twice.

Measured: one enrolment published, one message in the stream, one delivery, no
redelivery, and the controller enrolled the machine twice — the second minting a
credential that replaced the one the machine had just been handed, which is why
it then reconnected for ever as a user whose password the mesh had rotated. Every
report and every followed event doubled the same way, silently.

The stream goes in the subject because the pair is what identifies a consumer.
A subscriber's permission gains the same shape, keeping the bare name so an
existing consumer keeps working until the next assertion moves it.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-29 21:32:33 +02:00
parent bc31745607
commit 3fbf658c16
5 changed files with 69 additions and 5 deletions
+14 -1
View File
@@ -184,7 +184,20 @@ func (j *JetStream) EnsureConsumer(c Consumer) error {
// without the other is refused by the server with a message that does not say which half is
// missing.
if c.Queue != "" || c.Push {
want.DeliverSubject = "_DELIVER." + c.Name
// **Per consumer, which means per stream as well as per name** (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/146).
// A push consumer delivers onto an ordinary subject, and everything subscribed to that
// subject gets a copy. The controller holds a consumer called `controller` on CONTROL and
// another called `controller` on EVENTS, and both were given `_DELIVER.controller` — so the
// one process, holding both subscriptions, acted on every message twice. It enrolled a
// joining machine twice from one request, minting a second credential that replaced the one
// the machine had just been given; the same doubling applied to every report and every
// event the controller follows.
//
// The stream is in the name because the pair is what identifies a consumer — the server
// scopes a durable's name to its stream, and this subject is the only place that scoping
// was dropped. Already within what the controller may subscribe (`_DELIVER.controller.>`),
// so no permission moves.
want.DeliverSubject = DeliverSubjectFor(c)
}
switch _, err := j.js.ConsumerInfo(c.Stream, c.Name); {
+8 -2
View File
@@ -269,7 +269,13 @@ func PermissionsFor(p Principal) (Permissions, error) {
"mesh.control." + p.Node + ".>",
"$JS.API.CONSUMER.INFO.NODES." + p.Node,
}
sub = []string{"mesh.node." + p.Node + ".declare", "_DELIVER." + p.Node}
// The deliver subject carries the stream as well as the consumer's name, so what a
// subscriber is permitted has to carry it too (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/146). The bare name
// stays: an existing consumer keeps delivering where it always did until the controller's
// next assertion moves it, and a permission that only allowed the new shape would refuse
// every node in the mesh for exactly as long as that took.
sub = []string{"mesh.node." + p.Node + ".declare",
"_DELIVER." + p.Node, "_DELIVER." + p.Node + ".>"}
case KindModule:
// 1. Its own namespace: it publishes its events there and serves its tools there. Nothing
@@ -323,7 +329,7 @@ func PermissionsFor(p Principal) (Permissions, error) {
// take work over the new bus was refused the asking (2026-09-28).
worker := "SEAT_" + upperSnake(s.Name) + "_worker"
stream := seatStreamName(s.Name)
sub = append(sub, "_DELIVER."+worker)
sub = append(sub, "_DELIVER."+worker, "_DELIVER."+worker+".>")
pub = append(pub, "$JS.API.CONSUMER.INFO."+stream+"."+worker, "$JS.ACK."+stream+"."+worker+".>")
for _, a := range s.Accepts {
sub = append(sub, seatSubject(s, "accept", a))
+18
View File
@@ -94,6 +94,24 @@ func MeshStreams() []Stream {
}
}
// DeliverSubjectFor is where a push consumer's messages land.
//
// **Per consumer, which means per stream as well as per name** (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/146). A push
// consumer delivers onto an ordinary subject, and everything subscribed to that subject gets a
// copy. The controller holds a consumer called `controller` on CONTROL and another called
// `controller` on EVENTS; while both were given `_DELIVER.controller`, the one process holding
// both subscriptions acted on every message twice — a joining machine was enrolled twice from one
// request, and the second enrolment minted a credential that replaced the one the machine had just
// been handed. Every report and every followed event doubled the same way, silently: nothing is
// redelivered, no count is wrong, the work simply happens twice.
//
// The stream belongs in it because the pair is what identifies a consumer — the server scopes a
// durable's name to its stream, and this subject was the one place that scoping was dropped. It
// stays inside what a controller may already subscribe (`_DELIVER.controller.>`).
func DeliverSubjectFor(c Consumer) string {
return "_DELIVER." + c.Name + "." + c.Stream
}
// An Asserter is the part of a JetStream connection stream assertion needs. Narrow on purpose: it
// keeps this testable without a server, and keeps the client library out of everything that only
// wants to know what the streams are.
+27
View File
@@ -233,3 +233,30 @@ func containsStep(steps []string, want string) bool {
}
return false
}
// **Two consumers may share a name, and must not share a delivery subject** (novox/hq
// 04-ISSUES/146).
//
// A push consumer delivers onto an ordinary subject and everything subscribed to it gets a copy.
// The controller holds a consumer called `controller` on CONTROL and another called `controller` on
// EVENTS; while both were given `_DELIVER.controller`, the one process holding both subscriptions
// acted on every message twice — a joining machine enrolled twice from one request, with the second
// enrolment minting a credential that replaced the one the machine had just been handed.
//
// Checked here rather than against a server because it is a property of what the mesh asks for, and
// because the failure it produces is silent: every count is right, nothing is redelivered, and the
// work simply happens twice.
func TestNoTwoConsumersDeliverOntoTheSameSubject(t *testing.T) {
seen := map[string]string{}
for _, c := range MeshConsumers() {
if !c.Push && c.Queue == "" {
continue
}
subject := DeliverSubjectFor(c)
if other, taken := seen[subject]; taken {
t.Errorf("%s on %s and %s deliver onto %s, so whoever holds both acts on every "+
"message twice", c.Name, c.Stream, other, subject)
}
seen[subject] = c.Name + " on " + c.Stream
}
}
+2 -2
View File
@@ -34,11 +34,11 @@ accounts {
} }
{ user: "node.one", password: "$2a$11$nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn", permissions: {
publish: { allow: ["$JS.ACK.NODES.one.>", "$JS.API.CONSUMER.INFO.NODES.one", "mesh.control.one.>"] }
subscribe: { allow: ["_DELIVER.one", "_INBOX.node.one.>", "mesh.node.one.declare"] }
subscribe: { allow: ["_DELIVER.one", "_DELIVER.one.>", "_INBOX.node.one.>", "mesh.node.one.declare"] }
} }
{ user: "one.telegram", password: "$2a$11$tttttttttttttttttttttt", permissions: {
publish: { allow: ["$JS.ACK.EVENTS.one_telegram.>", "$JS.ACK.SEAT_TELEGRAM_SENDER.SEAT_TELEGRAM_SENDER_worker.>", "$JS.API.CONSUMER.INFO.EVENTS.one_telegram", "$JS.API.CONSUMER.INFO.SEAT_TELEGRAM_SENDER.SEAT_TELEGRAM_SENDER_worker", "$JS.API.CONSUMER.MSG.NEXT.EVENTS.one_telegram", "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.event.delivered", "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.event.failed"] }
subscribe: { allow: ["_DELIVER.SEAT_TELEGRAM_SENDER_worker", "_INBOX.one.telegram.>", "mesh.mod.telegram.tool.>", "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.accept.send"] }
subscribe: { allow: ["_DELIVER.SEAT_TELEGRAM_SENDER_worker", "_DELIVER.SEAT_TELEGRAM_SENDER_worker.>", "_INBOX.one.telegram.>", "mesh.mod.telegram.tool.>", "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.accept.send"] }
allow_responses: { max: 1, ttl: "1m" }
} }
{ user: "two.audit", password: "$2a$11$aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa", permissions: {