Merge main: the trunk renamed the seats and made them data

Both branches changed the seat set from the same starting point, so every number
collided and every `mesh-*` name existed twice. The trunk's numbers and names win:
this branch's records became 0129/0130 and its migrations 0037/0038, and the
hardcoded rename map gave way to the trunk's `seat_alias` table — a rename is a
row now (ADR 0122), not a recompile.

Three of my checks were wrong and the merge is what showed it:

A seat with an empty protocol is a marker, not an incomplete declaration. Most
node-scoped seats are markers — which module is this machine's packet filter —
and refusing one refused most of the set, the showcase module included. A
mistyped field name is already refused by the parser, so an empty protocol was
written as one deliberately.

A claim on a seat this manifest does not declare is not the parser's to judge. A
module may hold a seat another module declared; that is the whole reason ADR 0126
has callers name the seat and not its provider. Whether the seat exists is a fact
about the catalogue, so the refusal is at registration, where every declaration
is in view.

And a seat may share a name with the provision it delivers. `git`, the npm
registry and the artifact store still do, because renaming a delivering seat
cascades to every consumer requiring it, with a window where a holder stops
resolving mid-flight. The trunk deferred exactly those three on purpose.

Full suite green against a real NATS and store.

cmd/mesh-controller/rollout_test.go

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ func TestReadinessIsGatheredFromWhatTheMeshHolds(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	}
 	for _, a := range [][2]string{{"anchor", "nats"}, {"anchor", "gitea"}, {"laptop", "wallpaper"}} {
-		if err := inv.Assign(ctx, a[0], a[1]); err != nil {
+		if _, err := inv.Assign(ctx, a[0], a[1]); err != nil {
 			t.Fatal(err)
 		}
 	}