Merge main: the trunk renamed the seats and made them data
Both branches changed the seat set from the same starting point, so every number collided and every `mesh-*` name existed twice. The trunk's numbers and names win: this branch's records became 0129/0130 and its migrations 0037/0038, and the hardcoded rename map gave way to the trunk's `seat_alias` table — a rename is a row now (ADR 0122), not a recompile. Three of my checks were wrong and the merge is what showed it: A seat with an empty protocol is a marker, not an incomplete declaration. Most node-scoped seats are markers — which module is this machine's packet filter — and refusing one refused most of the set, the showcase module included. A mistyped field name is already refused by the parser, so an empty protocol was written as one deliberately. A claim on a seat this manifest does not declare is not the parser's to judge. A module may hold a seat another module declared; that is the whole reason ADR 0126 has callers name the seat and not its provider. Whether the seat exists is a fact about the catalogue, so the refusal is at registration, where every declaration is in view. And a seat may share a name with the provision it delivers. `git`, the npm registry and the artifact store still do, because renaming a delivering seat cascades to every consumer requiring it, with a window where a holder stops resolving mid-flight. The trunk deferred exactly those three on purpose. Full suite green against a real NATS and store.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ type Tunnel struct {
|
||||
Unit string `json:"unit"`
|
||||
Config string `json:"config"`
|
||||
Port int `json:"port"`
|
||||
MTU int `json:"mtu,omitempty"`
|
||||
Address string `json:"address"`
|
||||
Range string `json:"range"`
|
||||
PublicKey string `json:"public_key"`
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user