The bus account has JetStream, and the control plane's client has its own inbox
Two refusals the first live connections met. A user in the MESH account was told "JetStream not enabled for account" the first time it bound a consumer: with accounts defined, JetStream is enabled per account, not only globally — the account's setting, which the mesh owns, not the server's block, which it does not. And the control plane's client used a random inbox prefix where it is granted exactly _INBOX.<its user>.>, so the server's first answer could not reach it. The prefix now follows from the user in the URL, for every principal that dials so.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -521,7 +521,10 @@ func ComposeAccounts(principals []Principal) (string, error) {
|
||||
// One account for the mesh: accounts in NATS isolate subject spaces entirely, and the mesh is
|
||||
// one space (design 25 §4). The cost of that — that permissions are the only isolation — is
|
||||
// paid in the scoping of every inbox and every ack subject.
|
||||
b.WriteString("accounts {\n MESH {\n users = [\n")
|
||||
// JetStream is enabled per account once accounts exist at all: with only the global block set,
|
||||
// a user in MESH is told "JetStream not enabled for account" the first time it binds a
|
||||
// consumer, which is the first thing every host does (2026-09-28).
|
||||
b.WriteString("accounts {\n MESH {\n jetstream: enabled\n users = [\n")
|
||||
for _, p := range sorted {
|
||||
perms, err := PermissionsFor(p)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user