Assert the next compose carries the issued account (issue 1226, review round 2)

cmd/mesh-controller/process_accounts_integration_test.go

@@ -67,6 +67,17 @@ func TestAGainedProcessIsIssuedWhenTheDeliveryRecordsIt(t *testing.T) {
 	if err != nil || !held {
 		t.Fatalf("1226/AC2: recording the gained definition did not mint the process's account: held %v, %v", held, err)
 	}
+	// And the next compose carries the account, with no warning (1226/AC2).
+	var said bytes.Buffer
+	if _, err := prepareSend(leftOutSaidBy(ctx, &said), open, "laptop"); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("1226/AC2: the next compose failed: %v", err)
+	}
+	if strings.Contains(said.String(), "bus account is not issued") {
+		t.Fatalf("1226/AC2: the next compose warns of an account just minted: %q", said.String())
+	}
+	if _, held, err := inv.ModuleSecretIfIssued(ctx, "laptop", "mesh-mail", "broker-send"); err != nil || !held {
+		t.Fatalf("1226/AC2: the next compose carries no account for the process: held %v, %v", held, err)
+	}
 	build("b-2", "bbbbbbb2222")
 	again, _, err := inv.BusUserHash(ctx, "laptop.mesh-mail.send")
 	if err != nil || again != hash {
@@ -74,8 +85,9 @@ func TestAGainedProcessIsIssuedWhenTheDeliveryRecordsIt(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
-// 1226/AC1 and AC4 against the store: a process account nobody issued is warned of in the push's answer, naming
-// issue, and the send is not refused, so the machine's other modules are composed.
+// 1226/AC1 and AC4 against the store: given two modules on a machine, one with an unissued process account, when
+// the machine is composed, the rest of it is composed and sent, and only the warning in the push's answer names
+// the first, with `mesh-controller.issue <node> <module>`.
 func TestAnUnissuedProcessAccountIsWarnedOfAndTheRestIsComposed(t *testing.T) {
 	open := aMesh(t)
 	ctx := t.Context()