The routing record is 0066, not 0056

0056 is 'the authority is the control plane, not a database'. A citation
pointing at the wrong decision is worse than none: it reads as corroboration.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF

cmd/mesh-control/plan.go

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ func planFor(ctx context.Context, open *stores, nodeName string) (catalogue.Reso
 		return catalogue.Resolution{}, nil, err
 	}
 
-	// The domain this node composes its routed names under (novox/hq ADR 0056). A route
+	// The domain this node composes its routed names under (novox/hq ADR 0066). A route
 	// contribution carries only a label; the resolver joins <label>.<public-domain> for this node,
 	// so the fact travels on the node it belongs to rather than being looked up where the name is
 	// composed.
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ func declarationWith(ctx context.Context, open *stores, node string,
 		return nil, err
 	}
 
-	// And every routed name → the node that serves it (novox/hq ADR 0056). Alongside the
+	// And every routed name → the node that serves it (novox/hq ADR 0066). Alongside the
 	// `<node>.internal` names above, so a container — or an internal ACME validator — resolves a
 	// routed name to the proxy that serves it, mesh-wide. The mesh publishes the names it was told
 	// to serve and knows nothing about what they mean.
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ func declarationWith(ctx context.Context, open *stores, node string,
 }
 
 // routeNamesInTheMesh is every routed name and the address of the node that serves it (novox/hq
-// ADR 0056).
+// ADR 0066).
 //
 // **Mesh-wide, so any container resolves any routed name to its proxy** — including an internal
 // ACME validator, which cannot complete a challenge for a name it cannot reach. A routed name is