The routing record is 0066, not 0056

0056 is 'the authority is the control plane, not a database'. A citation
pointing at the wrong decision is worse than none: it reads as corroboration.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-11 00:09:56 +02:00
parent 522d8be925
commit c4030947b0
13 changed files with 25 additions and 25 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ import (
// module is assigned, long after the manifest was written, and until now nothing carried it into a
// file.
//
// The case that found this is a certificate authority inside the mesh (novox/hq ADR 0056). A proxy
// The case that found this is a certificate authority inside the mesh (novox/hq ADR 0066). A proxy
// reaches it at the address the mesh handed over, `<machine>.internal` — so the authority's own
// certificate has to be issued for that name, or the first thing that happens is the proxy refusing
// to talk to it. The authority is the one thing that cannot be told its name by a binding: it
// provides, it does not require. Written as a literal it would be a manifest carrying one
// deployment's machine name, which is the shape [ADR 0056] exists to remove.
// deployment's machine name, which is the shape [ADR 0066] exists to remove.
//
// Two facts, both the mesh's own vocabulary — the same `node` and `at` a contribution already
// carries. Nothing about what a machine is *for*: that would be the mesh learning what a module