The routing record is 0066, not 0056
0056 is 'the authority is the control plane, not a database'. A citation pointing at the wrong decision is worse than none: it reads as corroboration. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
This commit is contained in:
@@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ import (
|
||||
// module is assigned, long after the manifest was written, and until now nothing carried it into a
|
||||
// file.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The case that found this is a certificate authority inside the mesh (novox/hq ADR 0056). A proxy
|
||||
// The case that found this is a certificate authority inside the mesh (novox/hq ADR 0066). A proxy
|
||||
// reaches it at the address the mesh handed over, `<machine>.internal` — so the authority's own
|
||||
// certificate has to be issued for that name, or the first thing that happens is the proxy refusing
|
||||
// to talk to it. The authority is the one thing that cannot be told its name by a binding: it
|
||||
// provides, it does not require. Written as a literal it would be a manifest carrying one
|
||||
// deployment's machine name, which is the shape [ADR 0056] exists to remove.
|
||||
// deployment's machine name, which is the shape [ADR 0066] exists to remove.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Two facts, both the mesh's own vocabulary — the same `node` and `at` a contribution already
|
||||
// carries. Nothing about what a machine is *for*: that would be the mesh learning what a module
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user