Merge main (hq ADR 0266) into the mesh-cli answer, and close what the confirmation review found
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery covered: a later merge that contains it was delivered: novox/mesh-controller@14ab2ddd9b49 (merged as 63e85b25 into main, walk plan-17915459…

- The generic command verb only reads now (commandReads) and terminal-only
  commands are refused through any verb (terminalOnly). mesh-cli's
  ordinary line made neither check: `node account`, `token issue` and
  `secret export` from another node would have run. It now meets both, in
  the one function the command verb shares.
- The serving controller marks itself and its children never the terminal
  (ADR 0266); a line mesh-cli runs as the terminal drops that mark and
  carries MESH_CLI_TERMINAL, so it reads as the terminal it is.
- Two withholding tests searched the answer's text while JSON writes bytes
  as base64, so they held nothing. They search both now, each proved by
  disabling what it guards (Shown, the bus withholding, `calls` via Get).
- The control-node refusal is tested through the assign and unassign acts.
This commit is contained in:
jochen
2026-10-09 13:08:48 +02:00
51 changed files with 2429 additions and 70 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
// The process a mesh-cli test runs as a command line: it says the verb and the caller it was given, and
// ends (meshcli_test.go).
if os.Getenv(echoEnvironment) != "" {
fmt.Printf("verb=%q caller=%q\n", os.Getenv("MESH_VERB"), os.Getenv("MESH_CALLER"))
fmt.Printf("verb=%q caller=%q terminal=%v\n", os.Getenv("MESH_VERB"), os.Getenv("MESH_CALLER"), startedAtTheTerminal())
os.Exit(0)
}
conditions.Unsayable = func(o conditions.Observation, field string, r outward.Refusal) {