A settings proposal reads at a glance, its values whole where the sender is proven (issues 383 and 639)
The operator could not read the settings proposals on the phone: the change, the fingerprint and a how-to
paragraph in one wall of plain text, and the values masked as ‹path› and ‹address›, so the approval was
blind.
The ask is now a summary of what changes where ("Changes 3 setting(s) of mounts on shanks; approved, the
layer is set at once and shanks takes it at its next push."), then at most three points, one key each (more
keys: the first two and the names of the rest). Who proposed it, the fingerprint and how to read it whole
are its Details, which the router notes after the answers. The change is carried twice: under the content
rule, and whole (asks.Ask.Whole), shown only on a channel that proves who answers, a value shaped like a
secret withheld in both (from the earlier work on issue 383, #202).
Vendors mesh-sdk at 9588871 (fix/639-an-ask-reads-at-a-glance: Message.Note, asks.Glance), and captures its
conformance events at that commit.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -116,24 +116,43 @@ func TestAProposalAsksAtTheLevelApproveWithTheExactChange(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if q.Options[0].Binds == q.Options[1].Binds {
|
||||
t.Error("Approve and Decline bind the same act")
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, line := range []string{
|
||||
"Set the settings of mounts on shanks to these values?",
|
||||
"Proposed by g14/claude-code, through the mesh-controller seat, at " + r.now.Local().Format("15:04 on 2 Jan") + ".",
|
||||
"+ sources: recalbox=‹address›@‹path›:ro",
|
||||
"~ shares: library=‹path› (was: none)",
|
||||
"- old (was: x)",
|
||||
"Fingerprint " + fingerprint(layerDigest(mountsSources)) + ".",
|
||||
"read it whole, with this fingerprint",
|
||||
} {
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(q.Explanation, line) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the explanation lacks %q:\n%s", line, q.Explanation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The message reads at a glance (issues 383 and 639): a summary, then one point per key — and nothing else:
|
||||
// who proposed it, the fingerprint and the how-to are the Details, which the router notes after the answers.
|
||||
summary := "Changes 3 setting(s) of mounts on shanks; approved, the layer is set at once and shanks takes it at its next push."
|
||||
if q.Explanation != summary+"\n+ sources: recalbox=‹address›@‹path›:ro\n~ shares: library=‹path› (was: none)\n- old (was: x)" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the explanation:\n%s", q.Explanation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := asks.Glance(q.Explanation); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, leak := range []string{"nas.lan", "/mnt/recalbox", "/mnt/library", "smb://"} {
|
||||
if strings.Contains(q.Explanation, leak) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the explanation carries %q, which may not leave the mesh", leak)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Where the sender is proven, the values whole: the mount point and the share are what is approved.
|
||||
if q.Whole != summary+"\n+ sources: recalbox=smb://nas.lan/recalbox@/mnt/recalbox:ro\n~ shares: library=/mnt/library (was: none)\n- old (was: x)" ||
|
||||
asks.Glance(q.Whole) != nil {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the whole words:\n%s", q.Whole)
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, line := range []string{
|
||||
"Proposed by g14/claude-code, through the mesh-controller seat at " + r.now.Local().Format("15:04 on 2 Jan") +
|
||||
". Fingerprint " + fingerprint(layerDigest(mountsSources)) + ".",
|
||||
"Where who answers is not proven, its values are shown as ‹address›, ‹path› or ‹withheld›.",
|
||||
"Read it whole, with this fingerprint: settings proposals " + kept(r).ID + " at the controller's terminal",
|
||||
} {
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(q.Details, line) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Details lack %q:\n%s", line, q.Details)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if refusal, ok := outward.Check(q.Details, "anchor", "laptop", "shanks"); !ok {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the router would withhold a line of the details: %s", refusal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, howTo := range []string{"ingerprint", "settings proposals", "settings verb", "not proven", "Proposed by"} {
|
||||
if strings.Contains(q.Explanation, howTo) || strings.Contains(q.Whole, howTo) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the message carries the how-to %q", howTo)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
all := []string{q.Headline, q.Explanation, q.OnExpiry}
|
||||
for _, o := range q.Options {
|
||||
all = append(all, o.Label, o.Does)
|
||||
@@ -141,6 +160,9 @@ func TestAProposalAsksAtTheLevelApproveWithTheExactChange(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if refusal, ok := outward.Check(strings.Join(all, "\n"), "anchor", "laptop", "shanks"); !ok {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the router would refuse the ask: %s", refusal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if refusal, ok := outward.Secret(q.Whole, "anchor", "laptop", "shanks"); !ok {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the router would refuse the whole words: %s", refusal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Kept as the controller's own ask, about no condition, with the proposal whole and its digests.
|
||||
kept := r.theProposal(t)
|
||||
p := kept.Proposal
|
||||
@@ -173,11 +195,98 @@ func TestAMeshWideLayerIsProposed(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
q := r.askSent(t)
|
||||
if q.Headline != "Set notes on the whole mesh?" || q.About != "settings.notes.mesh" ||
|
||||
!strings.Contains(q.Explanation, "Set the settings of notes on the whole mesh to these values?") {
|
||||
q.Explanation != "Changes 1 setting(s) of notes on the whole mesh; approved, the layer is set at once and every machine takes it at its next push.\n+ x: 1" ||
|
||||
q.Whole != "" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%+v", q)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// kept is the one proposal the rig keeps.
|
||||
func kept(r *proposerRig) asked {
|
||||
for _, a := range r.store {
|
||||
if a.Proposal != nil {
|
||||
return a
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return asked{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The switch between the masked and the whole change (issue 383): the same change, under the content rule and
|
||||
// exact, differs in the masked values alone; a value shaped like a secret is withheld in both, whole, with its
|
||||
// key still named; and a change no value of which is masked carries no whole words of its own.
|
||||
func TestAProposalShowsItsValuesWholeOnlyWhereTheSenderIsProvenAndNeverASecret(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
machines := []string{"anchor", "laptop", "shanks"}
|
||||
r := newProposerRig(t)
|
||||
values := map[string]any{"shares": "media=/storage/media", "sources": "recalbox=smb://nas.lan/recalbox@/mnt/recalbox", "font": "Inter 13"}
|
||||
if _, err := r.pr.propose(context.Background(), proposeInput{module: "mounts", node: "shanks", values: values}); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
q := r.askSent(t)
|
||||
masked, _ := kept(r).Proposal.change(machines, false)
|
||||
whole, _ := kept(r).Proposal.change(machines, true)
|
||||
if !strings.HasSuffix(q.Explanation, "\n"+strings.Join(masked, "\n")) || !strings.HasSuffix(q.Whole, "\n"+strings.Join(whole, "\n")) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("the ask does not carry the change masked and whole:\n%s\n--\n%s", q.Explanation, q.Whole)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if want := []string{"+ font: Inter 13", "+ shares: media=‹path›", "+ sources: recalbox=‹address›@‹path›"}; strings.Join(masked, "\n") != strings.Join(want, "\n") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("masked: %q", masked)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if want := []string{"+ font: Inter 13", "+ shares: media=/storage/media", "+ sources: recalbox=smb://nas.lan/recalbox@/mnt/recalbox"}; strings.Join(whole, "\n") != strings.Join(want, "\n") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("whole: %q", whole)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, ok := outward.Secret(q.Whole, "shanks"); !ok {
|
||||
t.Error("the router would refuse the whole words")
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Mutation: the masked and the whole change differ in exactly the lines whose value was masked.
|
||||
differ := 0
|
||||
for i := range masked {
|
||||
if masked[i] != whole[i] {
|
||||
differ++
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(masked[i], "‹") || strings.Contains(whole[i], "‹") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the lines differ otherwise than by the mask:\n%s\n%s", masked[i], whole[i])
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if differ != 2 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%d lines differ, and the mask covered 2", differ)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// A value shaped like a secret is withheld in both, whole, with its key still named.
|
||||
r1 := newProposerRig(t)
|
||||
secrets := map[string]any{"github": "ghp_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789", "cert": "-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----"}
|
||||
if _, err := r1.pr.propose(context.Background(), proposeInput{module: "mounts", node: "shanks", values: secrets}); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
q1 := r1.askSent(t)
|
||||
for _, line := range []string{"+ cert: ‹withheld›", "+ github: ‹withheld›"} {
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(q1.Explanation, line) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("lacks %q:\n%s", line, q1.Explanation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, secret := range []string{"ghp_", "BEGIN CERTIFICATE"} {
|
||||
if strings.Contains(q1.Explanation, secret) || strings.Contains(q1.Whole, secret) || strings.Contains(q1.Details, secret) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("the secret %q reaches the phone", secret)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// More keys than points (issue 639): the first two, then the keys of the rest, read whole at the terminal.
|
||||
r3 := newProposerRig(t)
|
||||
five := map[string]any{"a": "1", "b": "2", "c": "3", "d": "4", "e": "5"}
|
||||
if _, err := r3.pr.propose(context.Background(), proposeInput{module: "notes", node: "laptop", values: five}); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if q3 := r3.askSent(t); !strings.HasSuffix(q3.Explanation, "\n+ a: 1\n+ b: 2\nand 3 more: c, d, e") || asks.Glance(q3.Explanation) != nil ||
|
||||
!strings.Contains(q3.Details, "settings proposals") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("five keys:\n%s", q3.Explanation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// No value masked: the message is the same everywhere, and the ask says no whole words.
|
||||
r2 := newProposerRig(t)
|
||||
if _, err := r2.pr.propose(context.Background(), proposeInput{module: "dunst", node: "laptop", values: map[string]any{"font-size": 13, "width": 500}}); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if q2 := r2.askSent(t); q2.Whole != "" || !strings.HasSuffix(q2.Explanation, "\n+ font-size: 13\n+ width: 500") ||
|
||||
strings.Contains(q2.Details, "not proven") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%+v", q2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A proposal expired unanswered is kept so by the reconciling, and a warrant for it afterwards sets nothing.
|
||||
func TestAnExpiredProposalIsKeptExpired(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
r := newAskerRig(t)
|
||||
@@ -205,7 +314,8 @@ func TestAClearIsProposedAndShowsWhatItRemoves(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
q := r.askSent(t)
|
||||
if q.Headline != "Clear notes on laptop?" || !strings.Contains(q.Explanation, "- places.data.owner: 1001:1001") ||
|
||||
!strings.Contains(q.Explanation, "- places.data.path: ‹path›") {
|
||||
!strings.Contains(q.Explanation, "- places.data.path: ‹path›") || !strings.Contains(q.Whole, "- places.data.path: /srv/notes") ||
|
||||
!strings.HasPrefix(q.Explanation, "Removes the 2 setting(s) of notes set on laptop; approved, the layer goes at once") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%+v", q)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if p := r.theProposal(t).Proposal; !p.Clear || p.Digest != layerDigest(r.before) || len(r.judged) != 0 {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user