Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 4b9bc50aad The builder resolves the SDK from the mesh registry, and can publish packages
A new 'package' artifact kind builds a module's own code on a public base image
and publishes it to the mesh's package registry by version (hq ADR 0076) — the
SDK above all, which the toolchain is built from and so cannot be built in the
toolchain. The credential a build needs to resolve or publish packages is
rendered as an .npmrc (basic auth, hq ADR 0048) and given to an image build as a
buildkit secret, never a layer, so a token is not baked into the toolchain image.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-16 10:27:26 +02:00
jschoubben 9070d2502c The builder narrates every step, and every command it runs
A build was silent from clone to publish, so a build in progress, one that failed
quietly, and a request that never arrived all looked identical — which cost a long
diagnosis against a running mesh chasing "the handler never fired".

Now: the handler announces a request the instant it lands. Build logs each phase
— clone, commit, manifest, bases, each artifact starting and finishing with what
it produced, resolve, done — through a Log callback that is nil-safe, so the tests
that pass none still build. And the Command runner echoes every command before it
runs, with where and how long it took, because on a hang the last line is exactly
the command it is stuck inside: "git clone waiting on a network that will not
answer" rather than "the builder did nothing".

The unreadable-request path prints to stdout now too, not stderr, so it shows in
docker logs without splitting streams — the split is what hid it.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-15 22:26:35 +02:00
jschoubben e3748bc06f One module, several languages, each bundle packed alone
A module is one piece of software and may still carry a daemon in one language,
tools in another and a package in a third. The first cut compiled every bundle
into the toolchain's single output directory, so two of them would have
overwritten each other and then been packed together — one artifact containing
both, published twice.

So output is a property of the artifact, not of the toolchain, and the toolchain
says how it is told where to write rather than where it writes. Under a directory
named for the build rather than beside the source, so a pack never sweeps up the
module's own working files.

A second toolchain is declared so the multi-language path is exercised rather
than asserted — a list with one entry cannot fail the way a list with four will.

And the fake compiler in the tests now writes where it was TOLD to. One that
always wrote to a fixed place would have passed whether or not each artifact got
its own directory, which is the whole of what these tests are for.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-15 02:09:06 +02:00
jschoubben 4b7bd1b3e2 A module says what it is written in, and needs no Dockerfile
The bundle recipe: the one that both builds and packs. An archive packs a
directory as it stands, so shipping compiled output meant compiling somewhere
first — which meant a Dockerfile repeating the same incantation in every module.
Two base arguments with no defaults, a working directory chosen so the SDK
resolves upward, the compiler invoked by absolute path because the usual symlink
is resolved away when the base image is assembled, a second stage, an environment
variable naming the entrypoints. Most of the catalogue is unconverted and that is
why; two conversions done in one session were each wrong twice with a working
example open in the next window.

A bundle says a language and a list of entrypoints. The mesh knows what the
language implies. Anything a module could override there it would be writing a
Dockerfile to override, so a toolchain is deliberately not configurable.

Declared rather than inferred, both of them: guessing the language from which
files are present makes a build depend on a directory listing, and guessing the
entrypoints makes it change meaning when somebody adds a helper.

A toolchain the mesh does not hold is refused before anything is compiled, naming
what to build first — the same treatment a missing base already gets, because it
is the same question and somebody can answer it. A language the mesh does not
build is refused saying what would have worked, since the author is usually one
word away.

The list of languages is closed and adding to it is a decision. Every language is
another implementation of the contracts every module shares, and those change
rarely and cascade when they do (ADR 0039) — a mesh whose SDKs disagree about the
envelope fails by ignoring messages rather than by failing to compile.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-15 01:59:07 +02:00