Commit Graph
463 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 966c5ddad3 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feat/roster-facts-are-templates
# Conflicts:
#	internal/catalogue/facts.go
#	internal/catalogue/facts_test.go
2026-09-27 01:41:23 +02:00
jschoubben b36f822cb6 Facts carry the format as a template, so the control plane holds none (ADR 0120)
A roster fact used to be a name from a closed list, each formatted in Go
here — node-names as a hosts file, node-zones as a resolver's zones. Every
new consumer (ssh's known_hosts, an authorized_keys) meant another formatter
in the control plane, in the consumer's own configuration language.

Now a fact is a path and a Go template over the roster view (this node, the
suffix, and every served name vs the machines). The mesh owns the data; the
module owns the format. /etc/hosts is a template on the network module;
dnsmasq's zones move to dnsmasq. The controller renders and reads neither.

WireGuard stays a computed generator: the overlay is the substrate delivery
rides on, and its config is topology, not a roster projection.

Output is byte-for-byte unchanged, pinned by the hosts golden tests and the
resolver tests that compose the real dnsmasq manifest.
2026-09-27 01:33:20 +02:00
jschoubben 7180a273a2 The enrolment user is per token, and it has an inbox
Design 25 §6 says an enrolling node subscribes the inbox its own token derives.
It had none: `sub` was empty, so a node would publish its request and wait out
its timeout against a mesh that had answered — the handshake could not have
completed.

And there was one shared `enrolment` user, which cannot carry that inbox at all:
a permission belongs to a user, so an inbox per token means a user per token.
Named after the node, which **is** the token's id — a token is issued for a node
record, the mesh holds one live claim per record, and the node's name is the one
identifier both sides have before anything else is agreed. It is also exactly
what the other transport does, where the account is named after the node and the
secret is its password.

A nameless enrolment user is now refused rather than composed into
`_INBOX.enrol..>`: an empty subject token, and worse, one every nameless
enrolment user would share — which is one machine able to read the credentials
sealed to another.

Still to wire: something that composes one of these per live token. Nothing
composes enrolment users yet, on either bus — on the old one the account is made
imperatively through the broker's management API when a token is issued, and
here there is no management API, so issuing a token has to recompose the server's
configuration. That is the remaining half of enrolment on the new bus.
2026-09-27 01:31:34 +02:00
jschoubben e65b3950cc A node's declaration consumer, which only the mesh can make
A host's account reaches no part of the JetStream API — correctly, because the
controller is the only writer of consumer definitions — so the object a node
reads its declarations through has to be waiting before the host binds to it,
and nothing created one. Named after the node, because the node's own ack grant
is `$JS.ACK.NODES.<node>.>` and a consumer named anything else is one the host
cannot acknowledge a delivery from.

No max-deliver, and a five-minute ack wait: a declaration is settled only after
the node has applied it and reported, which is minutes on a machine pulling
images, and the stream holds exactly one message per node — so there is nothing
to dead-letter, only one message to redeliver for as long as that node is away.

Asserted on start as well as created at enrolment, for the reason the streams
are: a mesh raised from a restored backup has node records and no consumers, and
a node whose consumer is missing hears nothing while everything else about it
looks correct.

The test sets the consumer against the grant the node actually gets, because
each of the three ways of getting it wrong is silent: a wrong name cannot ack, a
wrong filter reads another node's declarations, and a pull consumer is one a host
has no authority to bind.
2026-09-27 01:24:46 +02:00
jschoubben a0e09695e5 Merge pull request 'The uplink seat (ADR 0117), and the mesh's names written into the hosts file, not over it (hq 128)' (#79) from feat/the-uplink-seat-and-the-hosts-region into main 2026-09-26 23:00:19 +00:00
jschoubben 88bef39952 The consume side on NATS, and the window held by the server
The other implementation behind the seam, so the store-window guarantee now has
both: one loop, one message at a time, the same window deciding. What differs is
where a held message lives, and that is the whole point of the move — the AMQP
side keeps an unacknowledged delivery in this process, bounded by the prefetch
and lost if the controller stops; this keeps eight bytes saying when the window
opened, and the message stays the server's.

Checked against a running server, seven claims that reasoning cannot answer: a
report is heard and leaves the work queue; one the store cannot take is naked
with a delay, stays in the stream, and is recorded when the store returns; one
about a superseded declaration is settled without being acted on; one the store
never takes is let go once the bound passes; a heartbeat is heard and nothing is
persisted; and the enrolment answer reaches the address the request carried in
its payload — the test design 25 §2 asks for, so the reason for that field
cannot quietly become folklore.

Three things the wiring forced into the open:

**The controller could not have consumed a module event.** Its permissions
granted no event subject to subscribe and no ack subject on the events stream,
so every announcement would have been redelivered for ever, refused by the list
it already had. Both narrow: each followed subject named, not `mesh.mod.*.>`.

**The controller's consumers are not derived.** It files no manifest, so its
authority cannot come from a declaration that does not exist; they sit beside the
mesh's own streams and are asserted the same way. No max-deliver on CONTROL —
the window's bound is the controller's, and a server that dead-lettered first
would discard the push the stream exists to protect.

**Channels, not callbacks.** The library would run a handler on its own
goroutine, and the window's bookkeeping is unlocked because the AMQP loop never
had two.
2026-09-27 00:53:33 +02:00
jschoubben 06cf3c04e5 The consume side behind a seam, and the window wiring into the loop
The outbound half went behind `Bus` and the transport stopped reaching its
callers; this is the other half, and the larger one. Every handler took
`amqp.Delivery`, so the serving loop could not move to another bus without
moving enrolment, reports, builds, upgrades and catch-up with it in one breath.

`Control` states one message in the mesh's words — took it, dropped it, or held
it for the store — and `Inbound` is where messages come from. The AMQP
implementation is today's loop moved rather than changed: same queues, same
prefetch, same holding, because the mesh is running on it and a bus nothing
speaks yet is no reason to alter the one every node is on.

The window (window.go) is now what decides, instead of the conditions that were
inlined in the loop. Two things that surfaced in the wiring:

**Supersession is asked before the store, not after.** A report about a
declaration the mesh has moved past would otherwise wait out a restarting store
to be written and then overwrite what the node is doing now.

**Half of a report is not about a declaration, and that half is never stale.**
What the machine *is* — the tunnel it took over, the ports its own bundle
holds, what an adopted node found, a node moving its overlay key — reaches the
mesh on a report and nowhere else. A rekey set aside as stale is a node whose
overlay key never moves, and no retry is coming, because the node said it once.
So staleness is asked only of a report that is purely an apply's account.

The one thing holding-in-memory can do that holding-in-the-server cannot is
named rather than hidden: `About` sets aside a held message when a newer one
about the same thing arrives, and the bus being built ignores it because the
digest answers the same question.
2026-09-27 00:44:16 +02:00
jschoubben 7a8a19b11b A person's account (step 4.4, the account half)
Design 25 §7. A person is not a module and holds no seat: nothing is
addressed to them, nothing is delivered to them, and they have no durable
consumer. What they have is permission to ask, as a list of tools or `*`
for an administrator.

Four properties the tests hold it to, each of which is a way of being
wrong that would not announce itself: a person reaches nothing but tools,
so one cannot claim a module said something; no ack subject, because
authority over a consumer that does not exist is authority nobody would
audit; no allow_responses, because a person who can answer a request is
impersonating a module on a bus where anyone may serve a tool; and two
people do not share an inbox.
2026-09-27 00:17:52 +02:00
jschoubben ce6ac057f6 gofmt the probe 2026-09-27 00:14:47 +02:00
jschoubben abce68fdf0 Verify that a reply address does not survive a stream
Design 25 §2 builds enrolment around carrying the reply subject in the
payload, because a JetStream consumer claims the transport Reply field for
its own ack address. The whole handshake rests on it, so it is checked:
the caller asked for _INBOX.LCr3M83q... and the consumer saw
$JS.ACK.PROBE.probe_consumer... The design was right, and the workaround
is necessary rather than defensive.

Worth having as a test rather than a note: if a future server version
stopped doing this, enrolment would keep working and the reason for the
payload field would quietly become folklore.
2026-09-27 00:14:32 +02:00
jschoubben cc019908c2 Asking a tool goes through the seam, and loses two problems
Step 3.4. On the new bus there is no reply queue to declare and no
correlation to check: each account is granted one inbox prefix and no
other, so an answer cannot reach the wrong asker. That settles a cost
build.go records having paid — on a shared reply exchange every asker saw
every result, which is why the correlation was checked rather than assumed.

And a tool nobody serves says so at once rather than after the whole wait.
The difference between "that module is down" and "that tool is slow" is the
first thing a person asking wants, and both tests are against a real server
because both are claims about what the server does, not about this code.

RequestBuild stays as it is, and is a different shape on the new bus rather
than the same one: a build takes minutes, so it is work submitted to a
queue with the outcome returning to a reply subject the request carries —
the pattern design 25 §2 already sets for anything crossing a stream. It
touches the builder too, so it goes with that conversion.
2026-09-27 00:11:30 +02:00
jschoubben d0a9abcb1c The store window as a decision, and the problem moving it to the server
introduces

Step 3.4, the consume side's hard part. The guarantee (ADR 0083) is that a
push the controller cannot record because its store is restarting is held
and retried — never dropped, never falsely acknowledged. Keeping the
delivery unacknowledged in memory becomes a nak with a delay: the server
holds it, the controller keeps no list of parked messages, and a controller
that restarts mid-window loses nothing it was holding.

That is a plain win and it introduces one problem. Holding in memory let
the controller drop an older report when a newer one for the same node
arrived, "because acting on it after the newer would undo the newer". A
naked message is the server's and comes back whatever happened meanwhile,
so the older report is redelivered after the newer was applied.

The answer was already in the message. A report carries `Declared`, the
digest of the declaration it is about, which exists because an earlier
attempt to order reports by time lost the race it invited. So supersession
stops being something the controller remembers and becomes something it
checks — the same shape as a node refusing a superseded declaration by
sequence (issue 107): ordering settled by what a message says, not by when
it arrived.

Pure, so the guarantee is testable without a bus, a store or a clock. Nine
tests, including that staleness is decided before the store is waited on —
a redelivery that lost its race must not hold a slot a current message
needs.
2026-09-27 00:05:52 +02:00
jochen 63ba2d178f review: hold the hosts region through composition, and say so in plan
A declaration-level test composes the shipped networking module with a
resolver and asserts /etc/hosts arrives as mesh-wireguard.fact-node-names
with into: block and region-only content, that the resolver's restart-on
still names it, and that a resource's at passes through untouched — a
composition step dropping into would otherwise go unnoticed. plan --show
marks files written into, so a region is not read as the whole file.
The rollout order is spelled out: every node's host, the controller's
own included, must be block-aware before this controller ships (hq 128).
2026-09-27 00:05:41 +02:00
jschoubben 6c12780abe Describe the bus on its own terms
Comments framed the new bus by what it replaces — a comparison in almost
every explanation, which reads as though NATS were a variant of the old
thing rather than the mesh's nervous system. Removed throughout, and
OverAMQP becomes OverCurrent: the seam's two sides are the bus the mesh
runs on today and the one being built, not two protocols.

What remains is the client library's own package name, which is its name.
2026-09-26 23:51:00 +02:00
jschoubben 92d87b0082 gofmt bus.go — import grouping 2026-09-26 23:47:26 +02:00
jschoubben 2fad32767e The controller's outbound link behind a seam, with both transports
Step 3.4, first half. Every one of these took an *amqp.Channel, so the
transport reached every caller and swapping it meant touching all of them.
The seam turned out to be small — the controller sends exactly two kinds of
message that expect no answer — which is the same measurement that said
this bus could be replaced at all.

Bus is stated in the mesh's words, not a transport's: PublishEvent and
PublishDeclaration. Two implementations, both shipping, because steps 1 to
4 leave every node on AMQP and the NATS one is selected at the rollout.
Both ship is also what makes them comparable: one conformance fixture holds
both to the same envelope, and the NATS one is checked against a real
server reading back from the stream rather than from the code that wrote it.

Still on *amqp.Channel: RequestBuild and Ask, which carry reply-queue
machinery, and the whole consume side — the control loop, enrolment, serve.
2026-09-26 23:47:15 +02:00
jochen 51163b9f14 The mesh's names are written into the hosts file, not over it (hq 128)
/etc/hosts is the machine's: the distribution's localhost lines, the
operator's own entries, and marked blocks other tools maintain there.
Writing node-names whole replaced all of it the moment the private
network was taken, and every later write by those tools was lost at
the next machine joining. The node-names fact is now emitted with
into: "block", so the host owns only its marked region and keeps the
rest byte for byte. The region holds only the mesh's names: no header
claiming the file, no localhost, no 127.0.1.1 line — the floor was
never the mesh's to write. How a fact is written is a property of the
fact in the closed table; node-zones stays a whole file the mesh owns.

Sequencing: a host older than the block mode refuses the whole
declaration on an unknown into, so every host must be upgraded before
this controller is rolled out.
2026-09-26 23:46:51 +02:00
jochen 6557aca750 A machine's uplink is a seat (hq ADR 0117)
the-uplink joins the closed set as a node seat delivering nothing. Its
holder is the module for the machine's own network manager, and keeps
that manager from contradicting the mesh — the resolver file left to
resolv-conf, mesh0 left alone — without ever declaring a link. Held
per machine, so a machine running two managers is refused at
assignment rather than found by its resolver being rewritten. The
count test moves to fifteen; one test holds the seat's shape.
2026-09-26 23:45:47 +02:00
jschoubben 1801f1178e Hold the Go emitter to the shared fixtures
Every required header set, each value in the pinned shape, and the subject
derived the same way. Read from the sdk's conformance directory by sibling
path, never copied.
2026-09-26 23:40:59 +02:00
jschoubben f21a84c510 Merge pull request 'The controller marks a deliberately-empty declaration owns_nothing (hq 127)' (#78) from feat/controller-marks-owns-nothing into main 2026-09-26 21:40:18 +00:00
jschoubben e14b02991e The controller marks a deliberately-empty declaration owns_nothing (hq 127)
The host refuses an empty body unless told the emptiness is meant
(mesh-host#29). When a node's declaration composes to no resources —
which #77 now sends rather than skips — Body() sets owns_nothing, so
the node applies it and drops what it last held. A declaration with
resources never carries the marker. One test.
2026-09-26 23:40:04 +02:00
jschoubben bf82805cfd A manifest holds no subject, checked across all 72
Design 29 §1's load-bearing rule: a module names its events, tools and
seats locally and the mesh derives the subject, so reorganising the subject
space leaves every manifest correct. It held by construction, and a rule
held by construction is one a later field breaks quietly.
2026-09-26 23:34:42 +02:00
jschoubben 08ebb8c999 Merge pull request 'An empty declaration is sent, so a node drops what it last held (hq 127)' (#77) from fix/127-an-empty-declaration-is-sent into main 2026-09-26 21:32:43 +00:00
jschoubben 0a8a592ef4 An empty declaration is sent, so a node drops what it last held (hq 127)
push skipped any node whose declaration composed to zero resources. A
node that HELD something before — the broker opening a placement gave
an adopted node, say — then kept it forever: the empty declaration that
would drop it was never sent, and the node's own heartbeat re-applied
the stale resource with no way for the mesh to say it is gone. Now the
empty declaration is sent; the host drops what the mesh owned and keeps
what it found. A node that never held anything applies it as a no-op.
Surfaced on ace: the foundation-opening fix (#74) removed its only
resource, and the correction could not reach it until this.
2026-09-26 23:32:30 +02:00
jschoubben 173c8c7c21 Rename the mesh's seats to mesh-*, keeping their interfaces
novox/hq ADR 0118: the prefix is the reservation rule, so a module
declaring any mesh-* name is refused and there is no reserved-names list to
drift. Ten seats renamed in the table, the manifests that claim them, the
controller's own shipped manifests, and the tests.

Not the migration 0118 expected: a holding is derived at resolution from
manifests and never stored, so nothing recorded points at an old name. A
kept rename table tells a manifest written against one what it became —
kept rather than retired, because a module lives in its own repository and
may be registered long after the catalogue stopped using it.

**A seat is not the interface it delivers.** The git seat became mesh-git
and the git provision did not; likewise the package registry. A blanket
replace renamed both, and the failure read "the package registry is served
on <nil>", which does not say "you renamed an interface". A test now pins
every seat against what it delivers, and that neither name is also the
other.
2026-09-26 23:07:09 +02:00
jschoubben 98d348d5b9 Merge pull request 'The mesh's interface takes over the found tunnel's MTU' (#76) from feat/controller-carries-tunnel-mtu into main 2026-09-26 20:41:00 +00:00
jschoubben 7fc5fd02fd The mesh's interface takes over the found tunnel's MTU
Carries MTU from the reported tunnel (mesh-host#28) through inventory,
the overlay graph's TakeOver, into the generated config's [Interface].
A tuned path keeps its MTU across the takeover instead of regressing to
1420 and hanging transfers no ping would reveal. Two emit tests; a
tunnel with no MTU writes no line.
2026-09-26 22:40:42 +02:00
jschoubben 50878a9d98 Merge pull request 'A taken tunnel brings its ListenPort, even on a node the hub cannot dial' (#75) from fix/a-taken-tunnel-brings-its-port into main 2026-09-26 20:34:10 +00:00
jschoubben cc252472e2 A taken tunnel brings its ListenPort, even on a node the hub cannot dial
A home node behind NAT (no Endpoint → not Reachable) that took over a
tunnel must still listen on that tunnel's port: its LAN peers dial it
there. ListenPort was gated on Reachable, which conflated 'a peer dials
me here' with 'the hub can dial me' — so the takeover guard refused
overlay-up, and the guard's suggested remedy (re-place with an
endpoint) breaks a NAT'd node's path: it stops keepalive and hands the
hub a private LAN address to dial. TakeOver now carries the found
tunnel's port (already known to the controller), and the interface
listens on it when the node is not otherwise reachable. Two tests;
Endpoint-reachable nodes keep the old path unchanged.
2026-09-26 22:33:27 +02:00
jschoubben aa74bd86ca Derive a seat's stream and a module's consumer, and wire JetStream
Task 3.9's other half and 1.4's missing client. The derivation is pure and
unit-tested; only "does the server accept this" needs one running, behind
MESH_TEST_NATS so the ordinary suite stays offline.

A seat's work queue is created at registration, not assignment, so work
queues until a holder appears — a stream created at assignment would make
"the holder is not here yet" mean "your messages are gone". Named after the
seat, because the holder can change and the queued work must not care.

A holder's worker uses a queue group even though the seat guarantees one
holder: the seat is authority, the queue group is delivery, and tying them
together means the day somebody allows two holders every message is
processed twice with nothing reporting it.

One consumer per module carrying every filter, because its ack permission is
derived from its name.

And a real bug the live server caught: a durable name may not contain a dot,
but an ack subject is $JS.ACK.<stream>.<consumer>, so the single string that
read correctly inside the permission was rejected as a consumer name. Split
in two, beside the permission that has to match. Unfixed, the symptom would
have been every message redelivered forever with a permission list that
looks right — which is the failure design 25 §4 warns about.
2026-09-26 22:28:42 +02:00
jschoubben d2ab0b2b82 Merge pull request 'The broker opening is only on the broker's host, not every node' (#74) from fix/foundation-opening-only-on-the-broker-host into main 2026-09-26 20:20:50 +00:00
jschoubben 48d8c89749 The broker opening is only on the broker's host, not every node
Enrolling ace applied adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming to it, opening
5671 from anywhere (v4+v6) where nothing listens — the ace session
caught it. foundation ports widen the broker's from:mesh port to
from-anywhere so a machine that is not yet on the mesh can make its
first dial; that belongs on the broker's host alone. foundationPortsFor
keeps the port only when a module resolved onto this node listens on
it, so novox opens 5671 and a node that merely dials out opens nothing.
Two tests, both directions.
2026-09-26 22:20:10 +02:00
jschoubben 7232d6df4b A module may declare its own seats (novox/hq ADR 0118)
The manifest carries seats and uses; registration refuses a mesh-* name, a
duplicate declarer, an undeclared uses or claim, a seat with no protocol, a
scope mismatch, and a holder that does not answer what its seat promises.

The parser stops judging unknown claim names, because it cannot: another
module may declare that seat, and one manifest cannot tell. The test that
encoded the old rule is rewritten to assert the refusal at registration, and
a new one pins the case the parser could not have distinguished.

Tools are declared for the first time, under their own key — serves already
means a provision's facts.
2026-09-26 22:17:17 +02:00
jschoubben 112cbd294d Per-subject caps on EVENTS, and a comment corrected against the server
NATS refuses overlapping streams rather than double-storing, which is the
opposite of what the Overlaps comment claimed. The check still earns its
place — it names both streams at composition rather than one at apply — and
the refusal is what rules out a shared stream beside per-module ones.
2026-09-26 21:49:55 +02:00
jschoubben 553814b6eb The mesh bus seat is one per mesh, and the amqp broker does not contend
Step 2.3 of novox/hq ADR 0116. The refusal is the resolver's existing one;
these pin it for this seat, including that a different bus implementation is
refused for the same reason — the property that lets the bus be replaced.
2026-09-26 21:40:03 +02:00
jschoubben eeb0560fc2 The mesh-broker seat delivers mesh-bus (novox/hq ADR 0120) 2026-09-26 21:17:21 +02:00
jschoubben 1f36787d75 The mesh's four streams, asserted on every start
Task 1.4. The foundation set only — a seat's streams come at registration
and a module's consumers at assignment, neither of which has happened at
genesis (ADR 0118).

Asserted rather than created: a stream that was deleted, or a mesh raised
from a backup, must converge rather than run without the guarantee its
messages assume.

Two things the definitions have to get right, both tested:
- CONTROL names its subjects instead of taking mesh.control.>, because
  heartbeats live under that prefix and a stream of them competes for
  retention with the messages that matter
- EVENTS filters on the event token, which is why that token exists; a
  filter over a module's whole namespace would persist every tool call

Overlapping filters are refused where the set is written: NATS accepts two
streams matching one subject and stores the message twice under two
retentions, which nothing reports.

Adds nats.go as a dependency; it pulled golang.org/x/* forward. Full suite
green.
2026-09-26 21:02:18 +02:00
jschoubben c753f9d5c0 Compose the bus's accounts instead of calling a management API
Task 1.3 of novox/hq ADR 0116. On AMQP an account was an HTTP call; on NATS
it is text the controller composes and the server reloads (ADR 0106). Pure,
so the mesh's whole authority model is testable as strings.

NATS closes a gap management.go recorded rather than hid: LavinMQ has no
topic permissions, so an emitter was granted the events exchange whole and
ADR 0042's origin reservation was "stamped by the sdk, not enforced here".
Per-subject permissions make it the server's refusal.

Two things found by composing a real file rather than reading the design:

- a scoped inbox leaves a responder unable to reply, because the answer goes
  to the caller's inbox. allow_responses is the answer — one reply to the
  subject of a message actually received — and only principals that serve
  are granted it. Recorded in design 25 §4.
- composition must be deterministic: the module's entrypoint reloads on the
  file's digest, so an order-dependent composer would reload the whole bus
  on every controller restart. Covered by a test.

The golden fixture is the exact text `nats-server -t` accepts, so the syntax
is the server's rather than one we invented.
2026-09-26 20:58:49 +02:00
jschoubben 2f7b407000 Merge pull request 'A carried peer is nameable, and the mesh answers for it (hq 112)' (#73) from feat/112-a-carried-peer-is-nameable into main 2026-09-26 18:10:00 +00:00
jschoubben 952092ccb3 A carried peer is nameable, and the mesh answers for it (hq 112)
The tunnel the hub took over routes to machines the predecessor knows
by name and the mesh knew only by address — taking the resolver in that
state silences three machines at once. Now the operator states which
machine a carried address is (overlay name <address> <name>), the
statement rides tunnel_peer.named, and namesInTheMesh answers for named
not-yet-enrolled peers — one reading, so the hosts fact, a container's
hosts and the resolver cannot disagree. Enrolment verifies the word:
a machine enrolling under a named peer's key with a different name is
refused where the operator can read it, the stated name keeps the
carried address, and an enrolled peer's name is the node's — naming it
again refuses. The issue's rule holds: a name the predecessor answers
for keeps resolving until the machine behind it is a node.
2026-09-26 20:09:42 +02:00
jschoubben fb87f9f7d6 The mesh-broker seat delivers nothing
The bus is the only broker (novox/hq ADR 0117): messaging is subjects on it,
scoped by a module's own emits/consumes, not a server handed out as a
provision. So the seat joins mesh-controller and the-catalogue in delivering
no interface. Full suite green.
2026-09-26 19:34:14 +02:00
jschoubben ed08cc1adc Merge pull request 'A repeat assignment says nothing changed (ADR 0115)' (#72) from feat/a-second-assignment-says-so into main 2026-09-26 17:02:49 +00:00
jschoubben 50734095b8 A repeat assignment says nothing changed (ADR 0115)
One assignment of a module per node is now the rule, not a limitation —
the operator dropped the multi-assignment requirement, and the schema's
(node, module) key has been the decision since migration 0005. What
changed: Assign reports whether the assignment was new, and the command
says 'already runs — one node runs one of each (ADR 0115); nothing
changed' instead of printing 'is assigned' for a no-op, which read as
an action that happened. Idempotence stays: a repeat is exit 0, because
a script stating what is already true is not wrong.
2026-09-26 19:02:35 +02:00
jschoubben 95426e25cf Merge pull request 'A collision is two places, not two spellings' (#71) from fix/collisions-compare-placed-paths into main 2026-09-26 16:25:40 +00:00
jschoubben fda47558d5 A collision is two places, not two spellings
checkResources compared paths as written, so ${dir:state}/server.env —
the same characters in every module, a different directory in each —
refused the first two placed modules that met. Paths are placed before
they are compared, under the default root, which keeps every real
collision: distinct modules' places are distinct under any one root,
and a module stating another's placed root is caught because a pathless
directory now owns its placed path in the comparison too.
2026-09-26 18:25:28 +02:00
jschoubben 8ea80f9584 Merge pull request 'The assignment's own root is a place, and the manifest's maps are placed' (#70) from feat/the-assignment-root-and-the-manifests-maps into main 2026-09-26 16:18:27 +00:00
jschoubben 2e3b13c0f8 The assignment's own root is a place, and the manifest's maps are placed
Slice two of ADR 0112. A pathless directory saying place "." is the
assignment's one directory, <root>/<module> — to-be 27's shape — and
place never reaches the host, which parses strictly. The maps naming
where bindings, credentials and contributions land (binds, secrets,
own-secrets, receives, grants) fill against the placed directories at
composition, into fresh maps and a fresh module slice, because one
resolution composes for many nodes. The five absolute-path checks on
those maps accept a placed reference — resolution makes it absolute
before anything reads it — while certificate, operator-keeps and
accesses paths stay absolute-only: those are the operator's or another
vocabulary's. unknownDirRefs scans the maps too, and validates place
itself: only on a directory, only ".", never beside a stated path.

Found by the foundation tests validating the sibling catalogue: the
first conversion's blanket replace turned /var/lib/gitea/database.json
into ${dir:data}base.json — which resolves to the right path by pure
string concatenation. Production was saved by a coincidence; the
catalogue cleanup that follows spells it ${dir:state}/database.json.
2026-09-26 18:18:13 +02:00
jschoubben cd2481dcd8 Merge pull request 'A directory the mesh places: ${dir:<id>} and the pathless directory resource' (#69) from feat/a-directory-the-mesh-places into main 2026-09-26 15:52:25 +00:00
jschoubben d2cbc9dbdc A directory the mesh places: ${dir:<id>} and the pathless directory resource
The first executable slice of ADR 0112 / to-be 27, sized to what the
operator settled tonight: a module definition names no host path for
its own data. A directory resource may omit path; composition resolves
it to <root>/<module>/<id>, the root a node's setting on Rendering with
/var/lib as the default — which reproduces exactly the layout novox
converged to by hand. ${dir:<id>} names the place from a resource's
path, content, mounts, environment and env-files, the same shape as
${bound:…}. A directory that states a path keeps it and still answers
by name — that is the adopted-data placement, mssql its live case.

Resolved in the controller at composition, so the wire format and the
host change not at all; a reference naming no directory refuses at the
manifest and again at composition; nested fills are rebuilt, never
written into the manifest's own maps, because one manifest composes
for many nodes.
2026-09-26 17:51:54 +02:00
jschoubben e88d3bd485 Merge pull request 'A route may say the largest body it carries' (#68) from feat/a-route-may-limit-the-body-it-carries into main 2026-09-26 14:01:56 +00:00