ContributionsFrom settled to whichever of a module's several contributions to
one requirement sorted first, arbitrarily — the grant minted for it then
carried that contribution's label and port under a credential the OTHER
contribution's consumer never sees, and collided with that same
contribution's own entry from contributions() besides.
Confirmed live: minio's two route contributions (files-api, files) produced
three entries in route-adapter's received file — files-api twice, once
credentialed and once not, files not credentialed at all. Every
single-contribution module (gitea, keycloak, umami) already mints an unused
credential for `route` too — route never needs one, by its own
documentation — but with exactly one contribution to match there was nothing
to collide with, so it never surfaced.
Where a module contributes more than once, there is no single value to
settle on. The module still asks, still gets its one credential — a pair
credential is not a place for a label or a port anyway — and each named
contribution reaches the provider on its own, unchanged.
No cleanup needed for the secret already minted live for minio+route: the
sealed blob is a random pair credential unrelated to Values, which is
recomputed fresh on every plan/push regardless.
A module's contributes was map[string]map[string]any — one JSON object key
per requirement, structurally exactly one contribution to "route" ever.
minio needs two public hostnames (the S3 API and the console), which is
two different contributions to route from one module, and nothing let it
say so.
This is the same shape of problem ADR 0094 solved for secrets (a module
needing several values from one provider that gives one per pair):
contributes now accepts either the ordinary {label, port} object, or an
object of local names to several such objects. Detected per requirement
key by what's inside, since (unlike secrets' string-vs-object split) both
shapes are JSON objects: an ordinary contribution's fields are scalars, the
several-instance shape is local-name -> object. Confirmed against every
module.json in mesh-catalog before relying on that split.
Both route-proxy and the migration-era route-adapter already key generated
routers off the composed hostname (Values["name"]), not the module name,
so two contributions with the same From reach them as two independent
routes with no changes needed on the receiving side.
jschoubben