`status --json` emitted no JSON at all when a single node was unresolvable. A blocked
node is not on the private network, and a mesh whose hub is that node has no hub — which
came back through the reading as a refusal, so `status` printed nothing and `status
--json` put multi-line prose on stderr and not one byte on stdout. A machine-readable
interface that stops being machine-readable exactly when something is wrong is one nobody
can build an alarm on.
Why a machine cannot be worked out is read as data now, per machine, through the same
whoResolves the private network is built from — so this and the network agree about who
could not be resolved rather than deciding it twice. The private network failing to
compute is kept as a note beside it instead of ending the read: it is almost always a
consequence of those same refusals, and every question that does not depend on it is
still answered.
It reaches all three ways of saying it, from the one reading: the text form leads with it
because a machine here is in none of the answers below, the JSON carries `unresolved`
(always a list, never null) and `network`, and the page has a section of its own.
That also closes a silent success. A machine that resolves to nothing has nothing
computed for it, so there is nothing to compare it against and nothing it can be behind —
it appeared in no answer at all, and `status` reported a mesh where nothing could be sent
anywhere as "all doing what they were told".
statusAsJSON takes the whole reading now rather than a growing argument list, which is
what let an answer be added to the text form and forgotten here. The two are one
function's output in two shapes and must not be able to differ about what was asked.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LrgweAeERJYBg88c5cKDzF
"Not waiting" says the declaration is current, not that the machine
finished applying it: the sent digest is recorded at send. So a test
that pushed, saw waiting clear, and asked the machine what it was
running found containers that did not exist yet — the certificate fix
made compositions stable, and the settling that used to fail first had
been hiding the gap behind it.
The mesh already held the missing half: every machine's last report,
with its time. It just was not in the JSON. `reported` now sets each
machine's last word beside when the current declaration went to it, and
"has it caught up" becomes a comparison of two timestamps the mesh
recorded itself — a report newer than the send means the machine acted
on what was sent; older means it is still working, which waiting alone
cannot distinguish.
Adding "not running what the mesh would send it" to `status` and not to the
board would have left two answers to one question with a person in front of
each — which is the single thing this page's design forbids, introduced by the
change that was supposed to make the question answerable.
The published JSON carries it as well, so the page, the command and anything
built against either say the same thing from the same read. Additive, because
that shape is hard to change once anything is built against it.
Never told stays separate from out of date on the page as it is everywhere
else: same remedy, and nobody has ever asked that machine to be anything.
A board reads through interfaces and holds nothing. Everything it needs
is already answered — as text, for people, which is not something a page
can read.
`--json` rather than a serving API, because nothing needs one yet:
whatever serves a board runs the command, and the constraint holds either
way — the board never touches a context's store. An API is the larger
thing and should wait until something asks for it.
Both forms are gathered from the same reads before either says anything,
so they answer the same questions rather than being two implementations
that can drift. That was not true of the first version: the JSON printed
after the text, because the branch was too late.
Four properties, each asserted and each confirmed to fail when removed:
- refused and failed stay distinct all the way out. They are fixed in
different places, so one word for both sends half a page's readers to
the wrong one — and how much DID apply is carried, since "three of
eight" and "none of eight" are different machines
- a machine that never spoke carries no time at all, rather than a zero
one that any page would format as a date in 1970
- nothing is null. A page distinguishing "no machines are wrong" from
"this field is missing" has to handle both, and null is the one that
gets forgotten
- no field is named like a secret. Everything here comes from records
that hold no readable one, but a shape a page is built against is
exactly where one would eventually be added for convenience
jschoubben