Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jochen be92762969 Give every test a bus of its own, at the release the mesh runs (hq ADR 0237)
The live tests reached one shared bus and assert, read and remove the mesh's own objects by
their fixed names, so packages run in parallel deleted what each other read and the suite
passed only one package at a time; a red suite read as noise. internal/testbus starts a server
per test, linked in at the nats-server release go.mod pins, and a test holds that pin to the
catalogue's bus image and to the facts snapshot's bus when there is one, so the tests never run
a bus the mesh does not. The waiter test read a timing (the most connections held at one look)
and now reads the state it means (the fewest held across the wait). make check runs the packages
in parallel under the race detector, with a timeout.
2026-10-06 21:17:02 +02:00
jschoubben aa74bd86ca Derive a seat's stream and a module's consumer, and wire JetStream
Task 3.9's other half and 1.4's missing client. The derivation is pure and
unit-tested; only "does the server accept this" needs one running, behind
MESH_TEST_NATS so the ordinary suite stays offline.

A seat's work queue is created at registration, not assignment, so work
queues until a holder appears — a stream created at assignment would make
"the holder is not here yet" mean "your messages are gone". Named after the
seat, because the holder can change and the queued work must not care.

A holder's worker uses a queue group even though the seat guarantees one
holder: the seat is authority, the queue group is delivery, and tying them
together means the day somebody allows two holders every message is
processed twice with nothing reporting it.

One consumer per module carrying every filter, because its ack permission is
derived from its name.

And a real bug the live server caught: a durable name may not contain a dot,
but an ack subject is $JS.ACK.<stream>.<consumer>, so the single string that
read correctly inside the permission was rejected as a consumer name. Split
in two, beside the permission that has to match. Unfixed, the symptom would
have been every message redelivered forever with a permission list that
looks right — which is the failure design 25 §4 warns about.
2026-09-26 22:28:42 +02:00