Commit Graph
14 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 5a963aec10 A version prepares its state before it runs
The mesh derives the preparation from the module's own resource instead of each module hand-writing
a step beside it (novox/hq ADR 0135). A manifest says one word — `prepares` — and the mesh runs that
module's own program in its preparation mode, in the module's own context: the same image, the same
environment, the same mounts, because it is the same code. A published port and a fixed address are
taken away rather than copied, since the version being replaced still holds them.

One word for every kind of module: a Go binary receives `prepare` as its argument, a bundle receives
it through the runtime whose entry takes the same word. The control plane answers it like anything
else — its own schema stops being a special case, and its hand-written step is gone.
2026-09-28 12:43:15 +02:00
jschoubben a3e7683c63 The control plane migrates before it serves
The mesh replaced its own control plane with a build carrying a migration, applied none of it, and
then refused every build it recorded for three quarters of an hour while reporting itself healthy
(novox/hq 04-ISSUES/133). The module now declares the step ADR 0052 prescribes: a run-once
`migrate` before the server, re-run whenever the image moves because the image is part of a step's
digest, and gating — a migration that fails stops the new server from starting rather than letting
it serve against a schema it does not have.
2026-09-28 10:27:42 +02:00
jschoubben f8a9c3d6bc The control plane mounts the bus secret it reads
MESH_BUS_NATS_FILE named /run/secrets/bus and nothing put a file there: the
manifest binds each secret explicitly, and the switch added the secret and the
variable but not the bind. Found live — the control plane came up on the new bus
and could not read its own credential.
2026-09-28 01:03:18 +02:00
jschoubben 84024cbdb6 The control plane speaks the new bus
One environment variable moves it (design 25): MESH_BUS_NATS, read from the `bus`
secret `rollout mint` sealed to its machine, and the two that named the old bus go,
because being told about both is refused at start. Registered and built ahead of
the push that flips it, so the flip and the bus it flips to arrive in one
declaration — the same push that starts the new bus and hands this machine its
membership. Deliberately not merged until every credential is minted.
2026-09-28 00:31:57 +02:00
jschoubben e8aa7ed9e7 The move mints every credential and tells each machine its membership
`rollout mint` gives every principal the new bus will have a credential it does
not yet have and puts each where its owner reads it: a machine's as a membership
— bus address, fingerprint, password, transport — sealed into its declaration
(migration 0041, the `bus-membership` resource the host reads after applying); a
module's as its broker secret, through the same delivery `module issue` uses; the
control plane's own as its `bus` secret. Idempotent, and worked out from where the
bus's module is assigned rather than from this process's environment, because this
process is still on the old bus when it runs and must be.

This is the half of design 28 task 5.2 the first live attempt found missing: a
credential was minted only at enrolment, at `module issue` and for a person, so no
machine already enrolled could ever be moved. `rollout check` was right to refuse;
now there is something to run first.
2026-09-28 00:16:24 +02:00
jschoubben 81d52719f4 The Go base has to be 1.26: the NATS client requires it
`nats.go v1.54.0` declares `go >= 1.26`, so `go mod tidy` puts the directive at
1.26.0 and will not leave it at 1.25. The base image is pinned by digest at
1.25.14-alpine, so nothing in this repository compiles against it — caught when the
build machine's own build failed with "go.mod requires go >= 1.26.0 (running go
1.25.14)".

Moved to 1.26.8-alpine by digest, same flavour as before. The pin stays a digest:
the point of pinning is that the compiler does not change underneath a build, and
that is still true one version along.

Two other manifests carry the same pin for the same reason — they compile this
repository's code — and move with it in the catalogue.
2026-09-27 20:58:08 +02:00
jochen 71c8080359 Declare the broker's TLS directory as an access, not an undeclared bind
The swap from a named volume to the host directory left the mount undeclared, which main's own
manifest check now refuses: a bind the module did not declare is created by the runtime as root, so
the module's owner and mode never reach it and ADR 0030's data rule does not cover it.

The directory is the broker's — lavinmq declares it as its own, mode 0700 — so from here it is an
access, read-only: a pre-existing path this module is granted use of and does not own.
2026-09-26 14:55:04 +02:00
jschoubben caf9746759 mesh-controller: mount the broker TLS directory bind, not the old named volume
Found checking whether the named volumes mesh-catalog PR #54/#55 replaced
are actually unused before considering them safe to remove -- this repo
has its own independent volumes declaration for the same TLS material
(mesh-controller reads it directly, not through lavinmq's own resource),
and it still named the old mesh-broker-tls volume.

Right now the content is identical -- copied once during the conversion.
If the cert ever rotates, lavinmq writes the new directory and this would
keep reading stale content from the volume nothing else updates.

Checked both repos for any other reference to the four converted volume
names (mesh-store-data, mesh-broker-data, mesh-broker-tls,
mesh-registry-data): this was the only one.
2026-09-24 17:19:48 +02:00
jschoubben cdd3638312 The control plane's own manifest says where the node put the store and the broker
Beside each sealed connection genesis wrote, the port this machine put the
seat's holder at: `${seat:mesh-store:5432}` for the three stores,
`${seat:mesh-broker:…}` for the bus, the plain AMQP port and the management API.
Filled from the node's settings when the control plane composes its own
declaration; empty — the sealed value stands — when the mesh has nothing to add.

On its own, after the commit before it is built and running: a control plane
that does not know the placeholder passes it through as the value, and this
manifest is composed by whatever control plane is running when it is pushed.
The reader ignores an unfilled placeholder either way, and a test holds it to
ignoring exactly what this manifest says.

novox/hq 04-ISSUES/102
2026-09-23 23:49:55 +02:00
jschoubben b3486270d1 The control plane's recipe starts FROM the base its manifest declares, and an undeclared base is refused
The mesh's own images declare theirs now, so the refusal ADR 0097 deferred is live.
The builder's own image and the examples take arguments with defaults; make builds
them, not the mesh.
2026-09-21 22:16:10 +02:00
jschoubben 67de216160 The controller's own manifest reads its credentials from files too
The mesh-controller repository carries the manifest the mesh builds the
controller from; the catalogue's copy is what genesis registers. The two must
say the same thing, and the first rebuild from source proved they did not.
2026-09-21 10:33:22 +02:00
jschoubben fc4c5d1a60 The controller's seat is mesh-controller; a foundation module on a second node is refused
Renames the module's own claim the-controller -> mesh-controller (the seat is the server,
ADR 0079), and adds TestAFoundationModuleCannotBeRaisedOnASecondNode asserting each
foundation module's second assignment is refused with 'one per mesh'. Closes hq issue 056.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 02:13:26 +02:00
jschoubben c3b88b9148 Rename mesh-control -> mesh-controller, substrate -> foundation
One name per thing, per the HQ glossary: the module/container/image/binary/repo
becomes mesh-controller, the seat the-controller, and the store+broker pair the
foundation (embedded base bundles, default template and example lock renamed with
their go:embed directives). No behaviour change — a pure vocabulary rename.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-16 18:40:40 +02:00
jschoubben 3a08789d3c The control plane's declaration lives with the control plane
A module is a repository and a path within it, and the manifest sits at that
path. This one sat in the catalogue instead, so the thing that says what the
control plane is and the thing it is made of lived in different repositories
and could drift apart with nothing to notice.

It also names an artifact it builds rather than a placeholder digest somebody
fills in, which is what lets the mesh build its own control plane.
2026-09-13 03:27:10 +02:00