Every method of builds, build requests, rollouts, merges and assignments reads and writes the chain alone: the else branches that read the tables, the movers and MoveChain with their tests, chain_moved reads, ChainReads and the flags that switched a kind, the store's assignments mirror (KeepAssignmentPlans needs none of it: it uses only the AssignmentMirrored type, mirrors.go, and AssignmentValues, provisioning.go) and its tick, the move code of the controller's start, and ForTest's chain_moved row. The listed store tests of the move go with their functions; the tests of the readers, requests, assignments and plans that lived beside them stay in chain_store_test.go. Tests that replayed old data migrations over the build, assignment and pin tables are removed with the tables. The static test that no plan is written but through SavePlansMoving now reads the plan's chain path.
Once chain_moved records the kind, RecordBuild and every build read go through the chain (reuse key and published added); before that the tables are read as before. The serving controller copies the rows at its start, holding the lease: idempotent per key, rows counted against keys, the largest value measured, a refusal (urgent condition, nothing switched) on a count that differs or a value over the bus's largest, and a re-read when the table took a row meanwhile. ForTest attaches the chain in memory with builds moved; ForTestBefore leaves it unmoved. Build requests, gates and the other kinds are still in their tables.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
On 2026-10-09 a release's gate on the control node read the machine's
report against a newer send another plan had just made there, failed
three builds the machine had reported healthy, and put them back on
every machine to a controller older than the store's schema; that
controller then passed the newer plan's gate from its own health.
- A gate keeps what its send carried (digest, sequence) and reads the
report against it; a report on the last send is on it too.
- A gate judges only the build the machine was last sent: another build
there supersedes the judging — no verdict, nothing put back.
- A controller is told its build (MESH_CONTROLLER_VERSION, ${version}
in a process's env) and records how far it reads the store's schema;
a put-back to a build that reaches less, or never said, is refused
and the current build kept, said as urgent.
- A release's open gate holds other sends of its modules there, and a
plan's own first send waits on it.
A build refused for its repository is still recorded, and a fork carries the
commit the module was registered at: the rollback's search for the previous
build would have found it and registered it by the back door.
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
A plan's gated send for mail carried postgres's and mongodb's new builds
(policy record) to the control node and the anchor on 2026-10-07: a send
composes the machine's whole declaration from the builds the mesh holds,
and the gate only ever looked at modules that roll out. Every send but a
person's push now composes a recorded module from the manifest of the build
the machine was last sent and records that it still carries it; the bus
step moves the bus alone. And each move a gated send carries says how many
of the module's containers it recreates, and whether with a new image or
only their declaration.
A send carries the machine's whole declaration, so at the switch to roll the next send of
anything would have carried the old default's backlog, unjudged, to every machine. A gated
send now carries and judges everything waiting on its machine; every other send is refused
or leaves the machine; a release plan walks what waits one machine at a time, the control
node last, and one that fails holds the next until a person releases it.
A build that reported applied was sent everywhere; one that then did nothing, served
no tools or broke its machine's word reached every machine. Now the first machine is
judged by the component's health (the core's definitions, as doctor probes H-*, or a
module's own) three times over two minutes within ten; a failing gate puts the previous
build back there once, marks the build, and says it as a condition and an event.
Upgrades roll out by default; the bus is a planned step; a module deleted at its
source is not built (the public-acme plan failure).
jschoubben
jochen