The tunnel the hub took over routes to machines the predecessor knows
by name and the mesh knew only by address — taking the resolver in that
state silences three machines at once. Now the operator states which
machine a carried address is (overlay name <address> <name>), the
statement rides tunnel_peer.named, and namesInTheMesh answers for named
not-yet-enrolled peers — one reading, so the hosts fact, a container's
hosts and the resolver cannot disagree. Enrolment verifies the word:
a machine enrolling under a named peer's key with a different name is
refused where the operator can read it, the stated name keeps the
carried address, and an enrolled peer's name is the node's — naming it
again refuses. The issue's rule holds: a name the predecessor answers
for keeps resolving until the machine behind it is a node.
jschoubben