Commit Graph
36 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jochen 96fc4209d3 Assemble merges in a rolling window and walk each batch once (hq ADR 0276, issue 362)
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without …
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
Every merge opened a walk and the next merge of the branch superseded it: two
catalogue merges 18 s apart left a walk no delivery held, and the operator
started it by hand 58 minutes later. A merge now joins the open batch, kept in
the store (migration 0089), which is cut into one walk when no merge came for
merge-window (90 s) or at merge-window-at-most (10 min): one commit per
repository, the latest of its branch, with every file the batch's merges
changed. One walk at a time; a started walk is never superseded, a waiting one
is folded into the next. The walk names every merge it answers on the wire
(delivery.merges, taken_over_by, batch). A failed walk walks its earlier merges
alone, newest first, until one is delivered. A delivery group's order becomes
tier edges inside the walk. plans shows the batch assembling; S18 and S19
bound its waits; S16 names the merges a waiting walk answers.
2026-10-10 13:20:04 +02:00
jochen d0161fac52 Say a deleted module's reason, read a context's reason at the merged branch, and keep the snapshot's bytes (hq ADR 0267, review)
mesh/delivery delivered
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without …
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
2026-10-10 12:56:22 +02:00
jochen 887de9b5f2 Say why each module is in a plan: its build source's changed files, or why it is read whole (hq ADR 0267, issue 363)
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without …
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
A what-if named the build seat's holder as packaging the controller's
source, "rebuilt without their own source moving", while it was in the
plan because an open plan had not built it yet. The what-if and the merge
log now say, per module, which changed files of its build source moved it,
or that it is read whole and why: no build source recorded, a newer build
failed, or a plan has not built it yet.
2026-10-10 12:49:44 +02:00
jochen bd35b1c06c Judge a packaging module's news by plans that built it, over every plan since its build (hq ADR 0267, review)
mesh/delivery delivered
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
A plan that closed without building a module hid a missed merge from it;
a window of recent plans let an old closure back in once the plan that
overtook it slid out; a merge the forge gave no time was acted on again
every pass. A plan answering the merge's own commit is now a look at it,
and clocks a little apart do not make a merge history.
2026-10-10 03:23:50 +02:00
jochen 150f038ff8 Read a module whole while a plan has overtaken its build source, and plan every view alike (hq ADR 0267, review)
A failed build, or a plan closed before reaching a module, left the
closure its last good build said, and a fix-forward to a newly imported
package would have moved nothing. A missed merge moving only a module
that packages the repository was never caught up, and an older merge
read as history for it through a look that was not its own. The gate,
a pull request's check, the what-if and a delivery's order now read the
same view the merge handler does.
2026-10-10 03:20:36 +02:00
jochen 6c616838a5 Move a module on a merge only when its build source holds a changed file (hq ADR 0267, issue 363)
Every merge to the controller's repository planned the controller, the
build seat's holder and the route proxy in three gated tiers, whatever it
changed (issue 338). The planner now maps a merge's files onto the build
source each module's newest trunk build said: a README moves nothing, the
controller's command the controller alone, the proxy's program the proxy
alone. A module with none said, or one an open plan has yet to build, is
read whole as before. Sharing a repository draws no packages edge any more,
and one recorded before neither widens nor orders a plan.
2026-10-10 03:20:36 +02:00
jschoubben 58cb586c37 Answer the review of hq issues 348 and 349: gaps, parts, the newest merge in any state
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery delivered
- A reopened fault keeps its gaps: it was there at a send unless the send
  fell in one, so a send that breaks a machine recovered before it still
  fails its gate (A2).
- An undecided part holds only the conditions that name it (A4).
- D2 holds a silent resolver for the next run again, refused or not: a
  burst of refusals is also a restart (A3).
- A late merge is planned at the newest planned merge of its branch in any
  state, not only an open one (A1); merge times to the nanosecond (A5).
2026-10-09 15:00:56 +02:00
jschoubben 997a4925b0 Order a branch's plans by its merges, and build the newest commit (hq issue 349)
A merge acted on late by the catch-up made its plan after the plan of the
merge that followed it, superseded it by creation time, and folded its
unbuilt modules into a plan at the older commit: on 2026-10-09 the
forge's security fix (a082615b) was superseded by 8ff8197a. A plan now
keeps its merge time (migration 0086), supersession follows it, and a
merge older than an open plan of its branch is planned at that plan's
commit, which contains it.
2026-10-09 15:00:56 +02:00
jochen 7d63d2e68c Say why assign finds no module, and keep an assignment pending on its build
A merge asks for a new module's build, and assign answered "no module of that
name" until the build registered it, which read as a module nobody registered
(hq issue 325). Keep every build request, tell a build in flight, a module
known and not built, and an unknown name apart, and make an assignment made
while the build runs when the build registers the module.
2026-10-08 16:38:11 +02:00
jochen ea09f074db Build and register a new module when its merge lands (hq issue 300)
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery stopped: covered: its merge e7dca6c280bd is contained in cec797e996b2 which is delivered (walk plan-1791499975016484055); closed on the ope…
The delivery plan said a merge adding a module builds it, sent nowhere;
the merge built nothing, so the module was never registered and assign
refused it. The merge now asks for the build of every directory it adds,
outside the plan, and the take-in registers it like a hand build.
2026-10-07 22:32:20 +02:00
jochen 487aa040de Let a walk wait for its delivery's word, and serve the delivery's owner (hq ADR 0239)
mesh/merge-gate pass: every machine composes with the change as it did without (0 of 4 compose)
mesh/delivery delivered
mesh/delivery-group group feat/mesh-delivery delivered: every member is delivered
While the mesh-delivery seat has a holder on record, a merge that moves no
core module opens its walk and asks nothing until mesh-delivery or a person
says go; nothing of it is registered before its turn, so no other send
carries it. The controller keeps the planner, the gate, sending and the
walk, and gains the verbs the owner asks with: delivery-plan, -order,
-check (a group composed as one future state), deliver, delivery-stop,
delivery-walks; every walk kept is said as plan-moved.
2026-10-07 00:01:42 +02:00
jochen 58ebe590a5 Ask the planner what a pull request reaches; map a changed file onto modules in one place (hq ADR 0238)
touchedBy is now the only mapping of changed files onto modules — touched, added, and
read by no build — and reachOfMerge the planner's whole answer with the dependency walk.
The merge handler, the plan what-if, the merge gate's width and composition, and a pull
request's check all ask it, so planning and gating cannot disagree. The gate composes
the definitions of the modules a merge would rebuild or add, not every one in the tree,
and the check says the dependents a merge would build after them.
2026-10-06 22:34:57 +02:00
jochen b24bb030ec A changed file touches exactly the modules whose build reads it (hq issue 280, ADR 0237)
The builder reads a module's own directory (the repository for one built from its root)
and a repository its recipe packages, nothing else. A file in no module's directory was
read as shared code and rebuilt everything built from the repository: 103 modules for a
merge-check.sh added at the catalogue's root. It now touches nothing, in the merge
handler, the release planner and the pull request's check alike, and the gate says so.
2026-10-06 22:34:57 +02:00
jochen b1e02aca1b A module's directory is never shared code, held or not (hq issue 278)
The merge of mesh-catalog 7f99fb4a rebuilt 103 modules with the build agent in tier 0, and ADR
0236 recorded it as "a change to the build agent rebuilds most of the catalogue". The agent had
not changed: modules/showcase/index.ts had. showcase is the catalogue's reference module, held
by no machine, and its manifest was not in the merge, so whatTheMergeTouched read the file as
shared code and rebuilt everything built from the repository (88 came out byte-identical). The
agent stood first only because everything is built by it.

Whether a directory is a module is a fact of the repository at the merge commit, so the forge's
announcer now says it: module_dirs, the changed files' directories holding a module.json there,
with module_dirs_said. A changed file inside one is that module's business; only a file in no
such directory is shared. An announcer that does not say keeps the old rule. `plans` what-if
takes the same list as module-dirs.

And a regression for the open question: nothing depends on the build agent except by being
built by it, and built-by never widens a plan, so a change to the agent - manifest or program -
rebuilds the agent alone; what moved beside it is ordered after it.
2026-10-06 19:55:25 +02:00
jochen 2bfa6ae4a0 No build reaches a machine without a gate; a release plan walks what waits (hq ADR 0236)
A send carries the machine's whole declaration, so at the switch to roll the next send of
anything would have carried the old default's backlog, unjudged, to every machine. A gated
send now carries and judges everything waiting on its machine; every other send is refused
or leaves the machine; a release plan walks what waits one machine at a time, the control
node last, and one that fails holds the next until a person releases it.
2026-10-06 19:14:25 +02:00
jochen d7bf1bae83 Name the decision this builds: hq ADR 0236 (0235 is the bus's snapshot) 2026-10-06 18:56:54 +02:00
jochen d9289ef6d4 Gate a release plan's first machine and roll a failed build back there (hq ADR 0236)
A build that reported applied was sent everywhere; one that then did nothing, served
no tools or broke its machine's word reached every machine. Now the first machine is
judged by the component's health (the core's definitions, as doctor probes H-*, or a
module's own) three times over two minutes within ten; a failing gate puts the previous
build back there once, marks the build, and says it as a condition and an event.
Upgrades roll out by default; the bus is a planned step; a module deleted at its
source is not built (the public-acme plan failure).
2026-10-06 18:56:54 +02:00
jochen 2eb9a22c24 Act under a lease, keep accounts by order, one writer at composition (hq to-be 45 Phase 2)
Two controllers could both act (issue 204), a reconcile's report could
overtake the apply after it and the digest decided (issue 267), and a grant
could make a second writer of a machine's report.

- The lease (internal/lease, ADR 0229): mesh-controller_lease key `holder`,
  15 s age, renewed every 5 s by compare-and-set; the epoch is the revision
  it was taken at. The gate is the clock (stops 3 s before expiry); a refused
  renewal is a loss and the process exits; a holder that stops gives it back.
  serve takes it before asserting the bus. Epochs kept in the store
  (migration 0068 controller_epoch) as a floor: a bucket raised from nothing
  is compacted past it. Unleased (no epoch, S12 urgent) only when nobody
  holds it and the bus will not let it be written. A shell command acts
  under the holder's epoch, or its own lease when none.
- Declarations carry `epoch` inside the signed envelope, only to a machine
  whose latest account carried a report_sequence (mesh-host #35); would-send
  is composed with the epoch last sent. Allot and the send both pass the gate.
- Reports: contract in internal/link/order.go (epoch, sequence,
  report_sequence, older_than, refused_older). Accounts kept by epoch, then
  sequence, then report sequence; older refused, counted; unordered reports
  keep the digest rule. Plans by compare-and-set on a revision, with epoch.
  Conditions and calls carry the epoch and are not written off the lease.
- S12 and S13 (naming the writer by epoch) watched, D5 run; reset of the
  bucket said. Writers table compiled in and enforced in PermissionsFor; the
  controller no longer publishes mesh.control.>. A contract per consumed
  kind, and the empty-on-error lint over the repository.
- mesh-host pinned to its main with the epoch in the validator (D1 validates
  the envelope as sent).

Needs mesh-host's genesis lock with the lease grant (mesh-host PR) for
TestTheInstallersFirstUserListIsWhatTheControllerWouldCompose.
2026-10-06 12:29:18 +02:00
jochen 59f4d486b1 Catch up on merges the bus announced and never handed over (hq issue 266)
The controller acted only on what its events consumer handed it, so a merge
the bus skipped left modules behind with nothing said. The stream is now read
back every five minutes on a single-filter consumer, and any merge that would
still move a module after ten minutes is said and acted on.
2026-10-06 01:29:21 +02:00
jochen ed90771382 Send the bus's machine before the grants, and only when its user list moved (hq issue 249)
Grants first could hold back the very declaration that lets the controller
issue them. The holder now goes first, then buckets and memberships, then
the rest; a membership that fails holds back only its own machine, and an
announcement whose send stopped at its grants is asked again. Whether the
holder must go first is read from a digest of the user list it was last
sent, not its whole declaration. Migration renumbered to 0058.
2026-10-05 18:17:52 +02:00
jochen 672d1f4ca1 Leave an announced move to the plan rolling the module out (hq issue 249)
The catalogue's upgrade announcement sent every machine one after another
without waiting for any to apply, beside the plan that now sends one
machine first. A module an open plan has not finished sending is the
plan's to roll out.
2026-10-05 18:17:52 +02:00
jochen 208901c6cc Let a newer plan supersede the older open plans of its repository (hq issue 254, ADR 0218)
A merge planned without looking at open plans, so two plans worked the
same modules and a stuck plan stayed open for ever. The newer plan folds
in what older plans of the same repository and branch had not built or
sent, and closes them as superseded. A person can close a stuck plan by
id with `plans close <id>`.
2026-10-05 18:17:52 +02:00
jochen d7f359c498 Read a new module's directory as its own, not as shared code (hq issue 252)
A merge adding a module the mesh has not registered rebuilt every module
built from the repository. A path under a directory known to hold modules
belongs to that module when its module.json is among the changed files.
2026-10-05 18:17:52 +02:00
jochen e11caecdad Let two controllers overlap safely while one hands over to the other (hq issue 213)
The controller's machine moves it from the container to a process by
starting the process first and removing the container once the process
is up (mesh-host's `replaces`). For that moment two controllers share the
store and the bus. Checked what each does:

- the seat's verbs: a queue group per seat, each call answered once. Safe.
- the controller's consumers on CONTROL and EVENTS: push consumers with
  no delivery group, so the second bind is refused with "consumer is
  already bound" and serve exited. The process would restart for ever,
  the host would never see it up, and the container would never go. The
  second controller now stands by and binds when the first lets go
  (tested on a real bus; fails without the change).
- plans: read, changed and saved whole by the 30s timer, by build
  outcomes, by a merge and by `plans stop`. Two timers would each ask a
  tier the other had just asked. Working the plans now takes a
  session-level advisory lock on the inventory: the timer skips while
  another holds it, the other paths wait for it. Build asks happen only
  inside plan work and are covered by the same lock.
2026-10-04 01:11:26 +02:00
jochen 6784efae75 A commit is never a branch to follow (hq issue 215)
A build asked at a commit recorded that commit as the module's ref. Every merge after it failed to
match the module and its plan left it out without a word, and every plan that rebuilt it asked for
the same old commit again. Registration now keeps the branch the module followed (the default
branch for a new one); matching and re-asking read a recorded commit as the default branch, which
heals records already pinned this way; and a merge says which modules of its repository it leaves
out because they follow another branch.
2026-10-03 22:22:08 +02:00
jschoubben a69a832248 A merge produces a tiered plan the mesh keeps (hq ADR 0162)
A module's dependencies are one relation in the catalogue — stands-on, packages, built-by, declared —
answered by one call. A merge takes what moved and everything reachable from it, sorts the set into
tiers (a code dependency in the same tier, a build dependency after its base is built, a runtime
dependency after the build machine is built and running; the build machine's own base comes first,
built by the one that runs), writes the plan to the store, asks the first tier and returns. Every
outcome advances the plan; a ticker advances what outcomes cannot; a controller replaced mid-plan
resumes it. status lists open plans and names one that has waited too long.
2026-10-01 17:53:55 +02:00
jschoubben 853c63b181 A merge of a base rebuilds what stands on it
The controller knew which modules were built against which base artifacts and used it only when asked
(build --on). A merge that rebuilt the runtime image left forty-two modules on the old image until
somebody asked, twice, by hand (hq issue 186). The merge now takes every module standing on what moved,
through every layer, into the same rebuild, in base order — the same rebuild the flag does, asked by
the merge that made it necessary.
2026-10-01 16:09:26 +02:00
jschoubben 2f3bfda8c0 Work slower than the window says so, and one address is the bus's
Three faults the mesh's own logs showed this morning. A handler that outlives the acknowledgement
window was handed its message again while it was still working: acting on a merge builds modules,
minutes against a thirty-second window, so one merge ran the whole catalogue five times over. The
transport now says the work is in progress while it runs, which is where the window belongs.

Everything the mesh hands out — a token, a membership, a person's credential — took its address
from the enrolment setting, which on a mesh that has moved still names the broker it moved from:
the first person issued after the move was handed the retired broker's port. There is one bus, and
its address is the one the control plane is connected to.

And `operator issue` documented an argument order its parser refused.
2026-09-28 09:51:50 +02:00
jschoubben aa771616bb A merge rebuilds what it changed, and what packages it
Three faults in one path. A merge rebuilt every module built from the repository, so one change in
a repository holding twenty-six of them meant twenty-six builds. A merge into a repository a module
only *packages* source from rebuilt nothing — two modules are built from the control plane's own
repository and neither had ever been rebuilt when it moved — because the manifest the mesh keeps
carries no build section, so a build now says which repositories it read and the mesh keeps that
beside what it stood on. And a module handed over by hand could record a repository with no
directory inside it, which is a module nothing can ever rebuild (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/131, /132).

A change inside no module's own directory is a change to what they share, and everything built from
that repository is rebuilt: rebuilding too much is the safe direction, because the fault this whole
path exists for is a mesh that believes it is current and is not.
2026-09-28 09:20:01 +02:00
jschoubben 0014984116 An older merge does not move a source
The forge announces what it finds merged, and an old merge surfacing late moved the recorded head
backwards and rebuilt everything built from that repository, once per old merge. A merge made
before the source was last seen is history; one that says nothing about when is taken as news.
The catalogue now carries when each source was last seen. The bus-records test follows #116:
a module's tools are every one under its own name.
2026-09-28 05:12:37 +02:00
jschoubben 35252af665 A build records the bases it was handed, and the mesh reads its edges from builds
Bases reach a recipe as build arguments, so the digest was never in the file the builder read
edges from: no build on the mesh recorded what it stood on, and 'build --on', the bases-first
order and the merge follow-up all walked a graph with no edges (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/131). The
builder now reports every base it resolved; the controller records them by artifact path and
reads the newest build's edges from the store, since a recorded manifest carries no build.on.
2026-09-28 03:51:14 +02:00
jschoubben aecac5bda2 One bus: the AMQP transport is gone from the controller
The mesh runs on the seat's bus alone (novox/hq ADR 0131, design 28 task 5.5). The old
transport's consume loop, build request, tool ask, management API and account scoping are
deleted, and the bus switch with them; the controller connects to the broker seat and to
nothing else. The store-window tests keep their assertions on a bus-less fake, and the tests
that only made sense for the old transport's in-memory holding go with it.
2026-09-28 03:36:16 +02:00
jschoubben 525f10b858 A merge on the forge builds what it moved, bases first
The controller follows the forge's merges (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/131). For each
module recorded as built from that repository and branch it records the move to
the merge commit and builds it — bases first, because a module built before the
module it stands on is built against the old one and reports success, and a base
that fails stops what stands on it. Nothing is pushed here: what a finished build
does to the machines running the module stays the upgrade's decision.

Two more things the same ordering gives: `build --behind` builds bases first, and
`build --on <module>` rebuilds everything that stands on a module — the rebuild a
changed base needs, which "behind" does not see because their sources did not
move.
2026-09-28 02:59:02 +02:00
jschoubben e07b56ce43 An address is read from the node's settings where it is used, never recorded with a port
Three readers did not follow a moved foundation port (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/102),
and each took the control-node down in its own way: the control plane's own
store and broker connections, sealed at genesis with the port inside; and every
build the mesh ever recorded, kept as `<registry>:<port>/<module>/<artifact>@…`.

The control plane cannot open its own sealed connections to move a port, and it
cannot bind the store as a consumer would — a binding mints a credential. So its
settings get a third twin, `NAME_PORT`, read on top of the sealed value by the
store, the broker, the management API and the bus connection, and filled into
its container by a placeholder that names a seat, `${seat:mesh-store:5432}`,
from the node's given or mesh-assigned ports — never the manifest's number, and
empty when the mesh has nothing to add, so what genesis wrote stands. A value
that is still a placeholder is nothing said, aloud: the manifest naming it lands
in the next commit, once every control plane that composes it knows it.

A build is now recorded by digest and path — `artifact-store://<module>/<artifact>@…`
— and the store's address is composed in where a reference is used: the
declaration, the trust file, the bases a build is handed, a replay to the
catalogue. Over the network as `<node>.internal:<port>`; on the store's own node
before any network exists — every genesis push before its "network" step — by
loopback. A reference recorded before this, with an address, is re-routed the
same way when the mesh built it. The trust file and every provider's address
come from one derivation: the node's given port, over the mesh's assignment,
over the manifest's number.

novox/hq 04-ISSUES/102
2026-09-23 23:49:31 +02:00
jschoubben a3b7e830c8 Review of 083: a message the store cannot take is held and retried on a ticker, not slept on, so enrolments are answered meanwhile; a newer one per subject supersedes; the password is replaced after the spend; the same presenter may finish after a lost answer; upgrades retry only on the store 2026-09-22 14:23:03 +02:00
jschoubben c3b88b9148 Rename mesh-control -> mesh-controller, substrate -> foundation
One name per thing, per the HQ glossary: the module/container/image/binary/repo
becomes mesh-controller, the seat the-controller, and the store+broker pair the
foundation (embedded base bundles, default template and example lock renamed with
their go:embed directives). No behaviour change — a pure vocabulary rename.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-16 18:40:40 +02:00