Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jochen 0d1bb035cb Let a recorded module's move that restarts nothing roll out with its walk (issue 785)
Under a module's own record (its manifest's, or its irreplaceable data's), every
move waited for a person's push, even one that only changed a tools bundle: the
database server stayed behind on ace on 2026-10-15 although its walk said it
recreated none of its containers. ADR 0377 lets such a move roll out.

A move is judged per machine against the build that machine was last sent: it
goes when no container, mounted file, data path, data declaration, provider or
(for a module with data) long-running process changes. A person's record, the
bus and any move that cannot be judged still wait. The walk keeps per machine
which way each recorded module went and why, says it in its note and log, and
status names a machine behind with `push <node>` only for a move that waits.
2026-10-15 14:27:37 +02:00
jschoubben c2ea9b4c51 Send the rest at once after the first passes, and resume a stored gate (hq ADR 0353)
mesh/repo-check head c2ea9b4c5187 merged into trunk 1601cb17432e — fail: its merge-check.sh failed: --- FAIL: TestAReleaseSendsTheRestAtOnceAfterTheFirstPa…
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
mesh/merge-gate head c2ea9b4c5187 merged into trunk 1601cb17432e — pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every …
A release now sends every other machine in one step once its first machine
passed, each judged by its own gate; a failing one is put back without
stopping the others, a silent one is left. A send is kept before it is made,
and a machine already sent what a gate is for is not sent again: the gate
counts from that send and takes over another walk's readings of the same
build there.
2026-10-14 01:06:49 +02:00
jochen 4499e85476 No change to a machine takes effect unseen (hq ADR 0217, to-be 44)
mesh/delivery delivered
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery-group group feat/no-change-takes-effect-unseen delivered: every member is delivered
Two incidents had one shape: a change took effect that nobody saw first (hq issues 241, 304).
Three guards, each silent when nothing is at stake:

- settings show [--history], and a set that answers each key it adds, changes and removes, and
  refuses a removal unless --replace; the replaced or cleared layer is kept in settings_history,
  in the same transaction as the write (migration 0078).
- every send keeps a summary of what it sent (no file content), plan <node> --diff compares with
  it, and push with no machine is refused unless --all.
- a push that would give a running container's mount another host directory holds that machine,
  naming the module, mount and both directories, until push <node> --move <module>; a named push's
  cascade is held the same way.

Rebased onto main and fitted to it: the hold runs before the push says what it recreates, a whole
push still says so first and leaves machines waiting for a gate, the verb's push with no machine is
still --behind and a push still needs why. The verbs take plan diff, settings replace and history,
and push move beside a machine, each refused where it cannot take effect.
2026-10-08 01:44:43 +02:00
jochen 2bfa6ae4a0 No build reaches a machine without a gate; a release plan walks what waits (hq ADR 0236)
A send carries the machine's whole declaration, so at the switch to roll the next send of
anything would have carried the old default's backlog, unjudged, to every machine. A gated
send now carries and judges everything waiting on its machine; every other send is refused
or leaves the machine; a release plan walks what waits one machine at a time, the control
node last, and one that fails holds the next until a person releases it.
2026-10-06 19:14:25 +02:00
jochen 8bfaf1523e Keep a consumer bound where its data is; only a pin moves it (hq ADR 0232, issue 273)
Issue 258's fix let a mesh seat's holder elsewhere answer before this machine's own provider. Right
for the resolver, which any provider answers alike; for the store's seat it re-bound every database
consumer on a machine running its own store to the holder on another, each was given a fresh, empty
database there, and nothing said so for twenty hours.

- An offer says whether it keeps its consumers' data (`keeps-consumer-data`); unsaid, a provider
  that grants each consumer a credential does. For such a provision the seat's holder no longer
  overrules a provider beside the consumer; a pin still does.
- Where each such consumer was sent is recorded (migration 0071). A resolution that would bind it
  elsewhere keeps the recorded provider and says the move; one whose provider is gone is refused,
  never answered by another.
- A push says a kept move and raises it as an urgent condition at once; the self-check's D12 raises
  it every run, with a pinned move not yet sent as a warning and any unasked move as urgent.
2026-10-06 15:19:23 +02:00
jochen 2421b82ad2 Keep a named push from sending builds a policy or a plan holds back
A named push flushed every other machine whose declaration differed from
what it was last sent (hq ADR 0083). Under an upgrade policy of `record`,
or a plan still waiting on its first machine (ADR 0218), every machine
running the module differs, so `push <one>` sent the held build to all of
them (hq issue 259).

Each send now records which build of each module it carried
(node.sent_builds, migration 0061). The cascade, and the bus holder added
to a named push, skip a machine any of whose modules would move to a
build its policy records or an open plan has not sent it, and say which
module, which build, why, and that `push <node>` sends it. A machine
whose last send was not recorded is held until it is named. The named
machine itself, a whole-mesh push and `push --behind` are unchanged.
2026-10-05 22:22:03 +02:00