Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jochen bb1607e424 Say when the mesh is wrong: conditions, watchdogs, the bus's advisories, doctor (hq to-be 45 Phase 1)
Every one of the 48 core failures of research 031 was found by a person
looking; the mesh's answers carried the fact for whoever asked and told
nobody.

- The condition store (to-be 45 §2): mesh-controller_conditions, one key
  per open condition, written by compare-and-set so a person's silence
  and the watchdogs never lose each other's word; every transition kept
  ninety days in mesh-controller_condition-history and said as the
  seat's events condition-raised / condition-changed / condition-cleared
  (the condition at the top level, with event, at, change, why, show),
  offered again while the bus is away. Raised and cleared by observation
  only; a clearing reopened within ten minutes is the same condition with
  its count up, its silence kept. Verbs: conditions, conditions show,
  conditions silence (a hand act, at most a week), conditions history.
- ADR 0224's provider standing is the first kind, provider-failing, held
  by the provider's events; the provider_standing table is no longer read
  or written (left in place: dropping it is the operator's word).
- status leads with the open conditions, urgent first, and says all well
  only with none open; conditions it cannot read are said and not well.
- The signals table compiled in, one watchdog loop over it every 30s: S1
  heartbeat (3 intervals, asleep machines excepted, control node urgent
  after 30 min), S2 report after a send, S3 plan tier, S4 event loop deaf,
  S5 merge not acted, S6 ask lost, S7 call hung, S8 provider silent, S9
  advisories, S10 self-check silent, S11 node tools silent, S13 stale
  refusals; S12, S14, S15 deferred with their reasons. A row that cannot
  see raises probe-failed and clears nothing. A test generated from the
  table suppresses each signal inside and past its bound.
- The bus's advisories (maximum deliveries, a mesh consumer deleted) and
  the controller's own slow consumer and refused subjects, said in the
  mesh's words.
- doctor: the probe registry D1-D10 (D5 deferred) and DW, every five
  minutes, each in thirty seconds; a probe that cannot run is never a
  pass. D1 validates with mesh-host's own validator. Every run ends with
  the doctor-heartbeat event mesh-watcher listens for.
- The controller is granted its new buckets, events, the two advisories
  and $SRV.INFO; the node tools their tools-alive heartbeat. The streams
  and consumers the controller asserts and the ones D6/D7 expect are one
  derivation.
2026-10-06 10:21:11 +02:00
jschoubben 683b1ed693 The seat declares the facts its holder states
The grant permitted the control plane to state what it applied and the seat said nothing about it, so
the check that every derived subscription has an owner found the catalogue subscribing to a subject
nothing publishes — which is exactly the fault that check exists for, pointed at me.

A seat carries the protocol of its role (novox/hq ADR 0129), so the facts are the mesh-controller
seat's `emits`. That is also what lets another module declare it consumes them. No accepts, so no work
queue is raised for the seat — only what its holder may say. The agreement test now holds all three
places to one another: the seat, the grant, and the words the mesh states them with.
2026-09-28 16:36:45 +02:00
jschoubben 1ebad3786c The mesh says what it applied, and the replay has an address it may use
The pipeline was observable from a merge to an artifact and went dark where it touched a machine: a
node's report is control traffic only the control plane reads, so nothing said which version a
machine runs, or that it refused to (novox/hq ADR 0134). The control plane now states both under the
seat it holds — a role's events belong to the role and keep their address when the holder is
replaced — and only when the report is news, because a machine reconciles every minute and a fact per
report would be a fact per minute per machine.

Whether a report is news is the store's answer: it holds the previous one, so the listener returns it
and the server states the fact. That also gives the catch-up replay a subject the controller may
publish: it was published as a module's event from a module called "control-plane", which does not
exist, so the controller's own account refused it and every catalogue that asked what it missed was
answered with nothing.
2026-09-28 16:07:18 +02:00