A failed build, or a plan closed before reaching a module, left the
closure its last good build said, and a fix-forward to a newly imported
package would have moved nothing. A missed merge moving only a module
that packages the repository was never caught up, and an older merge
read as history for it through a look that was not its own. The gate,
a pull request's check, the what-if and a delivery's order now read the
same view the merge handler does.
Every merge to the controller's repository planned the controller, the
build seat's holder and the route proxy in three gated tiers, whatever it
changed (issue 338). The planner now maps a merge's files onto the build
source each module's newest trunk build said: a README moves nothing, the
controller's command the controller alone, the proxy's program the proxy
alone. A module with none said, or one an open plan has yet to build, is
read whole as before. Sharing a repository draws no packages edge any more,
and one recorded before neither widens nor orders a plan.
Three faults in one path. A merge rebuilt every module built from the repository, so one change in
a repository holding twenty-six of them meant twenty-six builds. A merge into a repository a module
only *packages* source from rebuilt nothing — two modules are built from the control plane's own
repository and neither had ever been rebuilt when it moved — because the manifest the mesh keeps
carries no build section, so a build now says which repositories it read and the mesh keeps that
beside what it stood on. And a module handed over by hand could record a repository with no
directory inside it, which is a module nothing can ever rebuild (novox/hq 04-ISSUES/131, /132).
A change inside no module's own directory is a change to what they share, and everything built from
that repository is rebuilt: rebuilding too much is the safe direction, because the fault this whole
path exists for is a mesh that believes it is current and is not.
A build result was answered to whoever asked and kept nowhere. So "when
did this last build", "why did it fail" and "which machine built what is
running" had no answer, and a build nobody was waiting for was reported
into the void — which is the same as not reporting it.
Failures are recorded too, and that is the point rather than a detail: a
failed build that leaves no trace is indistinguishable from one nobody
asked for, and the difference is the whole of whether somebody should be
looking at something. A build that never learned what it was building
keeps the repository, because that is what a person goes and looks at.
Recording is idempotent on the correlation id, because a result can
arrive twice — as the answer to whoever asked, and on the exchange when
nobody was. Two rows would show one build as two, and which is real is
not answerable afterwards.
The serving control plane now binds `built` as well, so results from
builds it did not ask for are kept. It refuses them loudly when it has
nowhere to put them rather than dropping them, so the broker's own
counters show something arriving that nothing handles.
`builds [<module>]` reads it: what happened lately across the mesh, or
what has happened to one module — the first asked after something goes
wrong, the second when deciding whether to trust something.
What was published is kept with the build, so a digest traces back to
what made it without holding the manifest twice in a place that can
disagree with the first.
jochen
jschoubben