A manifest names its toolchain by language, not in build.on, so the planner did not know a bundle
depends on the module that publishes its toolchain and built the two in one tier: the bundle
against the old toolchain, recorded as built from the new commit. The edge is read from the
manifest, so it holds before any build recorded it, and a toolchain that moves rebuilds every
bundle compiled in it.
One build machine built everything, in a queue of one, because the seat was mesh-scoped and a
mesh seat has one holder. ADR 0190 makes building a node role: node-build-agent, held on every
machine that builds, with the work asked of the role and taken by whichever holder is idle. The
work subject of a node-scoped seat carries no node — that token is for a seat's tools, asked of
one machine (design 33 §4) — so holders on several machines read one queue; a test now says so.
The retired mesh-build-machine row stays while the builder module's registered manifest claims
it: a claim to a seat the mesh no longer defines is refused, and the machine holding it would be
unresolvable until build-agent replaces it. Removed once no manifest claims it.
The installer's genesis template (in the host's repository) still grants the controller the old
seat's subjects; its test here says so until that template names node-build-agent.
A module's dependencies are one relation in the catalogue — stands-on, packages, built-by, declared —
answered by one call. A merge takes what moved and everything reachable from it, sorts the set into
tiers (a code dependency in the same tier, a build dependency after its base is built, a runtime
dependency after the build machine is built and running; the build machine's own base comes first,
built by the one that runs), writes the plan to the store, asks the first tier and returns. Every
outcome advances the plan; a ticker advances what outcomes cannot; a controller replaced mid-plan
resumes it. status lists open plans and names one that has waited too long.
jochen
jschoubben