Page an answer larger than one message of the bus, and keep overviews brief (hq issue 314) #138

Merged
mesh-admin merged 1 commits from fix/314-a-large-answer-is-paged-not-lost into main 2026-10-08 11:06:20 +00:00
Contributor

hq issue 314. On 2026-10-08 conditions and status outgrew the bus's max_payload (1 MiB) once 689 stalled deliveries were open conditions. The client library refused each reply inside the controller (nats: maximum payload exceeded, 577 times in the journal), callers timed out at 30 s, and calls said answered in 130 ms. The operator's channel, which reads conditions every minute, read nothing.

Reply path (internal/link/pages.go)

  • A seat answer over the connection's MaxPayload is held 5 min under its call id. The caller gets an error saying so, plus paged {call, bytes, parts, limit, until}.
  • A caller that pages asks the same subject again with header Mesh-Page: <call> <n>. That needs no new grant, and each part is its own request within allow_responses max 1. Each part is answered raw with Mesh-Part: n/parts, and only to the caller it was paged to.
  • Whole joins the parts. AskSeatTool and AskMeshSeatTool use it. A missing part fails the whole answer; it is never shortened.
  • A send the bus refuses anyway is recorded on the call (answer refused by the bus) and said to the caller in a message that fits. calls records answer paged. A call's record on the bus no longer carries an answer over 512 KiB.

Overviews (cmd/mesh-controller)

  • conditions and status list each condition with its newest evidence, evidence-kept and more: conditions key=<key>. conditions also answers counted (source and kind, then count). Lists are never shortened, because the operator's channel reads every open condition from them.
  • doctor shows at most 20 findings per probe, with found-count and more. The new optional argument probe=<id> gives one probe whole.
  • conditions, status and doctor send their JSON once, as answer. output carries only stderr.
  • 689 stalled deliveries: 458 KB on the wire, down from about 1.9 MB.

Replay: TestReplay314 (internal/link/replay314_test.go), registered as R314 in mesh-lab. The lab's prover: R314 (issue 314): PROVED — before its fix fails, on its fix passes.

sh merge-check.sh: passes (gofmt, vet, go test -race of every package).

Merge with novox/mesh-tools (the asker that joins parts) and novox/mesh-lab (R314). Either code PR can land first. A new controller with an old tool runner gives an explicit error for an oversize answer instead of a timeout. A new tool runner with an old controller changes nothing.

hq issue 314. On 2026-10-08 `conditions` and `status` outgrew the bus's `max_payload` (1 MiB) once 689 stalled deliveries were open conditions. The client library refused each reply inside the controller (`nats: maximum payload exceeded`, 577 times in the journal), callers timed out at 30 s, and `calls` said answered in 130 ms. The operator's channel, which reads `conditions` every minute, read nothing. **Reply path (`internal/link/pages.go`)** - A seat answer over the connection's `MaxPayload` is held 5 min under its call id. The caller gets an error saying so, plus `paged {call, bytes, parts, limit, until}`. - A caller that pages asks the same subject again with header `Mesh-Page: <call> <n>`. That needs no new grant, and each part is its own request within `allow_responses max 1`. Each part is answered raw with `Mesh-Part: n/parts`, and only to the caller it was paged to. - `Whole` joins the parts. `AskSeatTool` and `AskMeshSeatTool` use it. A missing part fails the whole answer; it is never shortened. - A send the bus refuses anyway is recorded on the call (`answer refused by the bus`) and said to the caller in a message that fits. `calls` records `answer paged`. A call's record on the bus no longer carries an answer over 512 KiB. **Overviews (`cmd/mesh-controller`)** - `conditions` and `status` list each condition with its newest evidence, `evidence-kept` and `more: conditions key=<key>`. `conditions` also answers `counted` (source and kind, then count). Lists are never shortened, because the operator's channel reads every open condition from them. - `doctor` shows at most 20 findings per probe, with `found-count` and `more`. The new optional argument `probe=<id>` gives one probe whole. - `conditions`, `status` and `doctor` send their JSON once, as `answer`. `output` carries only stderr. - 689 stalled deliveries: 458 KB on the wire, down from about 1.9 MB. **Replay:** `TestReplay314` (`internal/link/replay314_test.go`), registered as R314 in mesh-lab. The lab's prover: `R314 (issue 314): PROVED — before its fix fails, on its fix passes`. `sh merge-check.sh`: passes (gofmt, vet, `go test -race` of every package). Merge with novox/mesh-tools (the asker that joins parts) and novox/mesh-lab (R314). Either code PR can land first. A new controller with an old tool runner gives an explicit error for an oversize answer instead of a timeout. A new tool runner with an old controller changes nothing.
Author
Contributor

Delivery novox/mesh-controller@175b28ee421f — delivered since 2026-10-08T11:27:12Z

Delivery plan — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-controller
  • tier 1: build-agent
  • tier 2: route-proxy
  • ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy
  • g14: receives build-agent
  • novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy
  • shanks: receives build-agent
  • build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
  • route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it
  • route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves

Group fix/314-a-large-answer-is-paged-not-lost, in order: novox/mesh-controller@175b28ee42 → novox/mesh-tools@90c7871276

Machines

  • mesh-controller on novox: passed — healthy 3 times over 3m8s
  • mesh-controller on the rest running it: sent
  • build-agent on ace: passed — healthy 3 times over 3m26s
  • build-agent on the rest running it: sent
  • route-proxy on ace: passed — healthy 3 times over 3m38s
  • route-proxy on the rest running it: sent

Transitions

  • 2026-10-08 10:23 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-controller#138's head announced
  • 2026-10-08 10:29 proposed → checked (checked): the verdict names this commit
  • 2026-10-08 10:29 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail
  • 2026-10-08 11:07 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move
  • 2026-10-08 11:07 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path
  • 2026-10-08 11:27 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says

The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.

<!-- mesh-delivery:view --> **Delivery** `novox/mesh-controller@175b28ee421f` — **delivered** since 2026-10-08T11:27:12Z **Delivery plan** — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-controller - tier 1: build-agent - tier 2: route-proxy - ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy - g14: receives build-agent - novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy - shanks: receives build-agent - build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves - route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it - route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves **Group** `fix/314-a-large-answer-is-paged-not-lost`, in order: novox/mesh-controller@175b28ee421f → novox/mesh-tools@90c78712767e - novox/mesh-controller@175b28ee421f before novox/mesh-tools@90c78712767e: built by - composed together: pass — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) **Machines** - mesh-controller on novox: passed — healthy 3 times over 3m8s - mesh-controller on the rest running it: sent - build-agent on ace: passed — healthy 3 times over 3m26s - build-agent on the rest running it: sent - route-proxy on ace: passed — healthy 3 times over 3m38s - route-proxy on the rest running it: sent **Transitions** - 2026-10-08 10:23 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-controller#138's head announced - 2026-10-08 10:29 proposed → checked (checked): the verdict names this commit - 2026-10-08 10:29 checked → ready (accepted): the gate passed or warned, and the repository's own check did not fail - 2026-10-08 11:07 ready → published (merged): on the trunk its modules follow: merged there, and its walk opened — or nothing for a walk to move - 2026-10-08 11:07 published → delivering (go): its walk started: let go by this owner in its group's order, by a person, or on the controller's own path - 2026-10-08 11:27 delivering → delivered (done): its walk is done: every machine of its deploy plan passed, or was left as its policy says The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
Author
Contributor

Merge check at 4b431153

  • mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy)
  • mesh/repo-check: FAIL — its merge-check.sh failed: FAIL github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller 177.199s

Delivery plan — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-controller
  • tier 1: build-agent
  • tier 2: route-proxy
  • ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy
  • g14: receives build-agent
  • novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy
  • shanks: receives build-agent
  • build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
  • route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it
  • route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves

Run by the build seat on novox as build-1791451815185509130 (builds --log build-1791451815185509130).

build-1791449032350337518: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449091350337518: the build seat did not say whether 1ab84e69 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
spare owns nothing now — sent so it drops what it last held
  tier 0: plan-retry: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b
  tier 1:   tier 0: rebuild asked as build-1791452633972535475, joining plan-join at tier 0 (novox/a at c0ffee): the plan takes this build as a's outcome; the plan had failed and builds again from this tier
rebuild asked as build-1791452634018886350
build-1791452634533717675:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/a.git:
cancelled by hand
plan-cancel: a failed to build in tier 0; the tiers after it are not asked
cancelled build-1791452634533717675 (https://forge.example/novox/a.git, waiting): deleted from the node-build-agent queue and recorded failed, cancelled by hand — a plan that asked for it fails with that
build-1791452636360092465:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/w1.git:
cancelled by hand
build-1791452636361092465:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/w2.git:
cancelled by hand
build-1791452636359092465:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/dead.git:
cancelled by hand
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
ace: killed build-running
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
ace: ace is not building build-other
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
ace: ace is paused
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
g14: nothing on g14 answers node-build-agent.resume: its holder is not running, or is older than the verb
plan-rollout: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b
  tier 1: plan-own: done — novox/a at c0ffee, 1 tier(s)
build-at-commit was built at commit 01234567; a rebuild asks what a follows now, main — `replay build-at-commit` builds that commit
rebuild asked as build-1791452647744751528
build-1791449051074082822: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449052074082822: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449111074082822: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449112074082822: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
plan-1: mesh-controller settled from the build records as built (build-2)
plan-3: postgres settled from the build records as built (build-mine)
plan-2: x settled from the build records as failed (b)
release-1791452651768325382: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged
release-1791452651768325382: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
release-1791452651768325382: sent laptop 2 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
release-1791452652306839448: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged
release-1791452652306839448: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: anchor failed what it was sent
release-1791452652306839448: failed its gate on anchor: anchor failed what it was sent — app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: anchor failed what it was sent; put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send
this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
release-1791452652392724840: 1 build(s) wait for a gate on laptop; one machine at a time, each judged
release-1791452652392724840 releases it; `plans release-1791452652392724840` says where it is
release-1791452652392724840: sent laptop 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
plan-crashloop: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes
app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted)
plan-crashloop: app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted); put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was
novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3ad22356); plan plan-1791452655760439644, 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s)
  0: app
  tier 0:   modules/systemd-resolved is a new module in novox/mesh-catalog: build build-modules/systemd-resolved asked at main; registered when it lands, assigned nowhere
novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3da80a4b); it changed no module the mesh holds, and adds modules/systemd-resolved: built, registered when the build lands, and sent nowhere
build-1791449057281782164: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449117281782164: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
recorded as act-1791452657414399974-1 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on novox-be, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on anchor" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for
recorded as act-1791452657472339433-2 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on novox-be, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on laptop" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for
laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
build-1791449060730205017: the build seat did not say whether c1aaaaaa is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449120730205017: the build seat did not say whether c2bbbbbb is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
app at c2bbbbbb was made from the source build-1791449060730205017 was: registered with its artifacts, no move
build-1791449180730205017: the build seat did not say whether c3cccccc is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449240730205017: the build seat did not say whether c4dddddd is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449061269327933: the build seat did not say whether n1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791449121269327933: the build seat did not say whether n2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
nats at n2222222 was made from the source build-1791449061269327933 was: registered with its artifacts, no move
every machine running nats runs the build the mesh holds (n2222222): nothing to upgrade
build-1791449181269327933: the build seat did not say whether n3333333 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
plan-gate: app built from the source every machine running it runs: no move, nothing sent
plan-gate: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s)
plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes
status could not be composed (after 0s): the store did not answer — `status` answers the last summary, with its age
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
plan-97b1b2b closed at tier 1 of 2; what was asked still builds and registers, nothing further is asked
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 12 module(s) to anchor first in one send (m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12), the rest once its gate passes
plan-tier: m01 passed its gate on anchor (healthy 3 times over 0s); the rest are sent
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12 to laptop, one send each
plan-tier: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s)
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, node-tools), the rest once its gate passes
node-tools's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound)
plan-tier: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); app1 was not found wanting and is left as it is; node-tools failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); put back node-tools to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, app3), the rest once its gate passes
app1's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full
app2's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full
app3's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full
plan-tier: app1 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app2 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app3 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; put back app1 to c1, app2 to c1, app3 to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was
plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes
plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back
plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back; none reported left as it was
  tier 0: FAIL
FAIL	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller	177.199s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/objectstore-provisioner	1.017s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/postgres-provisioner	1.029s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/redis-provisioner	1.035s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/route-proxy	1.154s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/artifacts	1.050s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/broker	2.695s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/builder	2.337s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/catalogue	5.182s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/conditions	2.012s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/envfile	1.025s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/facts	1.023s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/identity	5.241s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/inventory	84.679s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lease	17.691s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences	4.877s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences/adapters	1.012s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/link	46.601s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lint	2.089s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/outward	1.043s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/overlay	1.026s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/secrets	1.527s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/store	3.489s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/testbus	1.206s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/token	1.022s
FAIL
**Merge check** at `4b431153` - `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy) - `mesh/repo-check`: **FAIL** — its merge-check.sh failed: FAIL github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller 177.199s **Delivery plan** — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-controller - tier 1: build-agent - tier 2: route-proxy - ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy - g14: receives build-agent - novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy - shanks: receives build-agent - build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves - route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it - route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves Run by the build seat on novox as `build-1791451815185509130` (`builds --log build-1791451815185509130`). ``` build-1791449032350337518: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449091350337518: the build seat did not say whether 1ab84e69 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before spare owns nothing now — sent so it drops what it last held tier 0: plan-retry: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b tier 1: tier 0: rebuild asked as build-1791452633972535475, joining plan-join at tier 0 (novox/a at c0ffee): the plan takes this build as a's outcome; the plan had failed and builds again from this tier rebuild asked as build-1791452634018886350 build-1791452634533717675: could not build https://forge.example/novox/a.git: cancelled by hand plan-cancel: a failed to build in tier 0; the tiers after it are not asked cancelled build-1791452634533717675 (https://forge.example/novox/a.git, waiting): deleted from the node-build-agent queue and recorded failed, cancelled by hand — a plan that asked for it fails with that build-1791452636360092465: could not build https://forge.example/novox/w1.git: cancelled by hand build-1791452636361092465: could not build https://forge.example/novox/w2.git: cancelled by hand build-1791452636359092465: could not build https://forge.example/novox/dead.git: cancelled by hand could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection ace: killed build-running could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection ace: ace is not building build-other could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection ace: ace is paused could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection g14: nothing on g14 answers node-build-agent.resume: its holder is not running, or is older than the verb plan-rollout: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b tier 1: plan-own: done — novox/a at c0ffee, 1 tier(s) build-at-commit was built at commit 01234567; a rebuild asks what a follows now, main — `replay build-at-commit` builds that commit rebuild asked as build-1791452647744751528 build-1791449051074082822: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449052074082822: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449111074082822: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449112074082822: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before plan-1: mesh-controller settled from the build records as built (build-2) plan-3: postgres settled from the build records as built (build-mine) plan-2: x settled from the build records as failed (b) release-1791452651768325382: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged release-1791452651768325382: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there release-1791452651768325382: sent laptop 2 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there release-1791452652306839448: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged release-1791452652306839448: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: anchor failed what it was sent release-1791452652306839448: failed its gate on anchor: anchor failed what it was sent — app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: anchor failed what it was sent; put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus release-1791452652392724840: 1 build(s) wait for a gate on laptop; one machine at a time, each judged release-1791452652392724840 releases it; `plans release-1791452652392724840` says where it is release-1791452652392724840: sent laptop 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there plan-crashloop: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted) plan-crashloop: app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted); put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3ad22356); plan plan-1791452655760439644, 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s) 0: app tier 0: modules/systemd-resolved is a new module in novox/mesh-catalog: build build-modules/systemd-resolved asked at main; registered when it lands, assigned nowhere novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3da80a4b); it changed no module the mesh holds, and adds modules/systemd-resolved: built, registered when the build lands, and sent nowhere build-1791449057281782164: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449117281782164: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before recorded as act-1791452657414399974-1 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on novox-be, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on anchor" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for recorded as act-1791452657472339433-2 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on novox-be, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on laptop" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node build-1791449060730205017: the build seat did not say whether c1aaaaaa is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449120730205017: the build seat did not say whether c2bbbbbb is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before app at c2bbbbbb was made from the source build-1791449060730205017 was: registered with its artifacts, no move build-1791449180730205017: the build seat did not say whether c3cccccc is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449240730205017: the build seat did not say whether c4dddddd is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449061269327933: the build seat did not say whether n1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791449121269327933: the build seat did not say whether n2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before nats at n2222222 was made from the source build-1791449061269327933 was: registered with its artifacts, no move every machine running nats runs the build the mesh holds (n2222222): nothing to upgrade build-1791449181269327933: the build seat did not say whether n3333333 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before plan-gate: app built from the source every machine running it runs: no move, nothing sent plan-gate: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s) plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes status could not be composed (after 0s): the store did not answer — `status` answers the last summary, with its age anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus plan-97b1b2b closed at tier 1 of 2; what was asked still builds and registers, nothing further is asked plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 12 module(s) to anchor first in one send (m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12), the rest once its gate passes plan-tier: m01 passed its gate on anchor (healthy 3 times over 0s); the rest are sent plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12 to laptop, one send each plan-tier: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s) plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, node-tools), the rest once its gate passes node-tools's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound) plan-tier: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); app1 was not found wanting and is left as it is; node-tools failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); put back node-tools to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, app3), the rest once its gate passes app1's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full app2's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full app3's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full plan-tier: app1 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app2 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app3 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; put back app1 to c1, app2 to c1, app3 to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back; none reported left as it was tier 0: FAIL FAIL github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller 177.199s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/objectstore-provisioner 1.017s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/postgres-provisioner 1.029s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/redis-provisioner 1.035s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/route-proxy 1.154s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/artifacts 1.050s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/broker 2.695s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/builder 2.337s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/catalogue 5.182s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/conditions 2.012s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/envfile 1.025s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/facts 1.023s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/identity 5.241s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/inventory 84.679s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lease 17.691s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences 4.877s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences/adapters 1.012s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/link 46.601s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lint 2.089s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/outward 1.043s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/overlay 1.026s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/secrets 1.527s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/store 3.489s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/testbus 1.206s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/token 1.022s FAIL ```
Author
Contributor

Merge check at 4b431153

  • mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy)
  • mesh/repo-check: FAIL — its merge-check.sh failed: FAIL github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller 165.835s

Delivery plan — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-controller
  • tier 1: build-agent
  • tier 2: route-proxy
  • ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy
  • g14: receives build-agent
  • novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy
  • shanks: receives build-agent
  • build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
  • route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it
  • route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves

Run by the build seat on g14 as build-1791453413691869212 (builds --log build-1791453413691869212).

build-1791450041090555519: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450100090555519: the build seat did not say whether 1ab84e69 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
spare owns nothing now — sent so it drops what it last held
  tier 0: plan-retry: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b
  tier 1:   tier 0: rebuild asked as build-1791453641366655142, joining plan-join at tier 0 (novox/a at c0ffee): the plan takes this build as a's outcome; the plan had failed and builds again from this tier
rebuild asked as build-1791453641417845598
build-1791453641872923271:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/a.git:
cancelled by hand
plan-cancel: a failed to build in tier 0; the tiers after it are not asked
cancelled build-1791453641872923271 (https://forge.example/novox/a.git, waiting): deleted from the node-build-agent queue and recorded failed, cancelled by hand — a plan that asked for it fails with that
build-1791453642491662043:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/w1.git:
cancelled by hand
build-1791453642492662043:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/w2.git:
cancelled by hand
build-1791453642490662043:  could not build https://forge.example/novox/dead.git:
cancelled by hand
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
ace: killed build-running
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
ace: ace is not building build-other
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
ace: ace is paused
could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection
g14: nothing on g14 answers node-build-agent.resume: its holder is not running, or is older than the verb
plan-rollout: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b
  tier 1: plan-own: done — novox/a at c0ffee, 1 tier(s)
build-at-commit was built at commit 01234567; a rebuild asks what a follows now, main — `replay build-at-commit` builds that commit
rebuild asked as build-1791453653127335379
build-1791450056180800864: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450057180800864: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450116180800864: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450117180800864: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
plan-1: mesh-controller settled from the build records as built (build-2)
plan-3: postgres settled from the build records as built (build-mine)
plan-2: x settled from the build records as failed (b)
release-1791453656702844384: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged
release-1791453656702844384: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
release-1791453656702844384: sent laptop 2 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
release-1791453657109154445: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged
release-1791453657109154445: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: anchor failed what it was sent
release-1791453657109154445: failed its gate on anchor: anchor failed what it was sent — app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: anchor failed what it was sent; put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send
this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
release-1791453657174421321: 1 build(s) wait for a gate on laptop; one machine at a time, each judged
release-1791453657174421321 releases it; `plans release-1791453657174421321` says where it is
release-1791453657174421321: sent laptop 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there
plan-crashloop: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes
app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted)
plan-crashloop: app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted); put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was
novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3ad22356); plan plan-1791453659655302616, 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s)
  0: app
  tier 0:   modules/systemd-resolved is a new module in novox/mesh-catalog: build build-modules/systemd-resolved asked at main; registered when it lands, assigned nowhere
novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3da80a4b); it changed no module the mesh holds, and adds modules/systemd-resolved: built, registered when the build lands, and sent nowhere
build-1791450060748745101: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450120748745101: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
recorded as act-1791453660854032571-1 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on g14, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on anchor" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for
recorded as act-1791453660895024528-2 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on g14, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on laptop" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for
laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
build-1791450063343477772: the build seat did not say whether c1aaaaaa is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450123343477772: the build seat did not say whether c2bbbbbb is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
app at c2bbbbbb was made from the source build-1791450063343477772 was: registered with its artifacts, no move
build-1791450183343477772: the build seat did not say whether c3cccccc is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450243343477772: the build seat did not say whether c4dddddd is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450063737469895: the build seat did not say whether n1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
build-1791450123737469895: the build seat did not say whether n2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
nats at n2222222 was made from the source build-1791450063737469895 was: registered with its artifacts, no move
every machine running nats runs the build the mesh holds (n2222222): nothing to upgrade
build-1791450183737469895: the build seat did not say whether n3333333 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before
plan-gate: app built from the source every machine running it runs: no move, nothing sent
plan-gate: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s)
plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes
status could not be composed (after 0s): the store did not answer — `status` answers the last summary, with its age
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied:
  - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node
this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus
plan-97b1b2b closed at tier 1 of 2; what was asked still builds and registers, nothing further is asked
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 12 module(s) to anchor first in one send (m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12), the rest once its gate passes
plan-tier: m01 passed its gate on anchor (healthy 3 times over 0s); the rest are sent
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12 to laptop, one send each
plan-tier: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s)
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, node-tools), the rest once its gate passes
node-tools's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound)
plan-tier: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); app1 was not found wanting and is left as it is; node-tools failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); put back node-tools to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was
plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, app3), the rest once its gate passes
app1's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full
app2's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full
app3's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full
plan-tier: app1 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app2 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app3 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; put back app1 to c1, app2 to c1, app3 to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was
plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes
plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back
plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back; none reported left as it was
  tier 0: FAIL
FAIL	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller	165.835s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/objectstore-provisioner	1.011s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/postgres-provisioner	1.017s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/redis-provisioner	1.013s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/route-proxy	1.243s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/artifacts	1.045s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/broker	3.060s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/builder	2.022s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/catalogue	6.749s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/conditions	2.071s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/envfile	1.043s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/facts	1.029s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/identity	6.786s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/inventory	89.074s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lease	17.661s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences	6.320s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences/adapters	1.010s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/link	48.636s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lint	2.431s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/outward	1.051s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/overlay	1.033s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/secrets	1.678s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/store	3.668s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/testbus	1.222s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/token	1.035s
FAIL
**Merge check** at `4b431153` - `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy) - `mesh/repo-check`: **FAIL** — its merge-check.sh failed: FAIL github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller 165.835s **Delivery plan** — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-controller - tier 1: build-agent - tier 2: route-proxy - ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy - g14: receives build-agent - novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy - shanks: receives build-agent - build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves - route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it - route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves Run by the build seat on g14 as `build-1791453413691869212` (`builds --log build-1791453413691869212`). ``` build-1791450041090555519: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450100090555519: the build seat did not say whether 1ab84e69 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before spare owns nothing now — sent so it drops what it last held tier 0: plan-retry: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b tier 1: tier 0: rebuild asked as build-1791453641366655142, joining plan-join at tier 0 (novox/a at c0ffee): the plan takes this build as a's outcome; the plan had failed and builds again from this tier rebuild asked as build-1791453641417845598 build-1791453641872923271: could not build https://forge.example/novox/a.git: cancelled by hand plan-cancel: a failed to build in tier 0; the tiers after it are not asked cancelled build-1791453641872923271 (https://forge.example/novox/a.git, waiting): deleted from the node-build-agent queue and recorded failed, cancelled by hand — a plan that asked for it fails with that build-1791453642491662043: could not build https://forge.example/novox/w1.git: cancelled by hand build-1791453642492662043: could not build https://forge.example/novox/w2.git: cancelled by hand build-1791453642490662043: could not build https://forge.example/novox/dead.git: cancelled by hand could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection ace: killed build-running could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection ace: ace is not building build-other could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection ace: ace is paused could not read what is assigned, so the build is asked of node-build-agent: this process has neither MESH_STORE_INVENTORY nor MESH_STORE_INVENTORY_FILE, so it was not granted the inventory store. A context reaches only the store it exclusively owns (novox/hq ADR 0008), so this is either the wrong context or a missing grant — it is never something to work around by reusing another context's connection g14: nothing on g14 answers node-build-agent.resume: its holder is not running, or is older than the verb plan-rollout: tier 0 done; asking tier 1: b tier 1: plan-own: done — novox/a at c0ffee, 1 tier(s) build-at-commit was built at commit 01234567; a rebuild asks what a follows now, main — `replay build-at-commit` builds that commit rebuild asked as build-1791453653127335379 build-1791450056180800864: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450057180800864: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450116180800864: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450117180800864: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before plan-1: mesh-controller settled from the build records as built (build-2) plan-3: postgres settled from the build records as built (build-mine) plan-2: x settled from the build records as failed (b) release-1791453656702844384: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged release-1791453656702844384: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there release-1791453656702844384: sent laptop 2 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there release-1791453657109154445: 2 build(s) wait for a gate on anchor, laptop; one machine at a time, each judged release-1791453657109154445: sent anchor 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: anchor failed what it was sent release-1791453657109154445: failed its gate on anchor: anchor failed what it was sent — app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: anchor failed what it was sent; put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus release-1791453657174421321: 1 build(s) wait for a gate on laptop; one machine at a time, each judged release-1791453657174421321 releases it; `plans release-1791453657174421321` says where it is release-1791453657174421321: sent laptop 1 build(s) that waited for a gate; judging them there plan-crashloop: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes app's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted) plan-crashloop: app failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: its container app.server on anchor keeps restarting (2 restart(s) counted); put back app to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3ad22356); plan plan-1791453659655302616, 1 module(s) in 1 tier(s) 0: app tier 0: modules/systemd-resolved is a new module in novox/mesh-catalog: build build-modules/systemd-resolved asked at main; registered when it lands, assigned nowhere novox/mesh-catalog merged into main (3da80a4b); it changed no module the mesh holds, and adds modules/systemd-resolved: built, registered when the build lands, and sent nowhere build-1791450060748745101: the build seat did not say whether c1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450120748745101: the build seat did not say whether c2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before recorded as act-1791453660854032571-1 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on g14, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on anchor" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for recorded as act-1791453660895024528-2 in the hand-act log: a push of recorded builds (resolver from c1111111 → c2222222) by an unnamed account at a shell on g14, because "operator's yes: the resolver's new build on laptop" — the person's word their upgrade policy asks for, which no healer is wanted for laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node laptop is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node build-1791450063343477772: the build seat did not say whether c1aaaaaa is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450123343477772: the build seat did not say whether c2bbbbbb is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before app at c2bbbbbb was made from the source build-1791450063343477772 was: registered with its artifacts, no move build-1791450183343477772: the build seat did not say whether c3cccccc is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450243343477772: the build seat did not say whether c4dddddd is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450063737469895: the build seat did not say whether n1111111 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before build-1791450123737469895: the build seat did not say whether n2222222 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before nats at n2222222 was made from the source build-1791450063737469895 was: registered with its artifacts, no move every machine running nats runs the build the mesh holds (n2222222): nothing to upgrade build-1791450183737469895: the build seat did not say whether n3333333 is on its repository's trunk (it predates ADR 0238); registered as before plan-gate: app built from the source every machine running it runs: no move, nothing sent plan-gate: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s) plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes status could not be composed (after 0s): the store did not answer — `status` answers the last summary, with its age anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is left out of the rest of the mesh: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node anchor is not counted as on the network: it does not resolve: these assignments cannot be applied: - rival-one and rival-two both claim "the-seat", and only one thing may hold it per node this act by hand could NOT be recorded in the hand-act log, and is done anyway: this control plane has no MESH_BUS_NATS, so it cannot reach the mesh's bus plan-97b1b2b closed at tier 1 of 2; what was asked still builds and registers, nothing further is asked plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 12 module(s) to anchor first in one send (m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12), the rest once its gate passes plan-tier: m01 passed its gate on anchor (healthy 3 times over 0s); the rest are sent plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent m01, m02, m03, m04, m05, m06, m07, m08, m09, m10, m11, m12 to laptop, one send each plan-tier: done — novox/mesh-catalog at c2, 1 tier(s) plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, node-tools), the rest once its gate passes node-tools's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound) plan-tier: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); app1 was not found wanting and is left as it is; node-tools failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.core-behind — anchor runs the node tools it was last sent, not yet reported applied, and no plan is rolling them out (its settle window runs to the gate's bound); put back node-tools to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was plan-tier: tier 0 built; sent 3 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app1, app2, app3), the rest once its gate passes app1's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full app2's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full app3's build c2 failed its gate on anchor and was put back to c1: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full plan-tier: app1 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app2 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; app3 failed its gate on anchor in tier 0: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor as a whole: raised since it was sent: machine.anchor.disk-full — anchor's root file system is full; put back app1 to c1, app2 to c1, app3 to c1 on anchor, in one send; none reported left as it was plan-gate: tier 0 built; sent 1 module(s) to anchor first in one send (app), the rest once its gate passes plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back plan-gate: the send to anchor in tier 0 failed its gate: not healthy within -1s of its apply: anchor has not reported on what it was sent; app was left as it was — anchor already ran app c2, or a build identical to it, before the send, so nothing of it moved and nothing is put back; none reported left as it was tier 0: FAIL FAIL github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller 165.835s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/objectstore-provisioner 1.011s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/postgres-provisioner 1.017s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/redis-provisioner 1.013s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/route-proxy 1.243s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/artifacts 1.045s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/broker 3.060s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/builder 2.022s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/catalogue 6.749s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/conditions 2.071s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/envfile 1.043s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/facts 1.029s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/identity 6.786s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/inventory 89.074s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lease 17.661s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences 6.320s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences/adapters 1.010s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/link 48.636s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lint 2.431s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/outward 1.051s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/overlay 1.033s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/secrets 1.678s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/store 3.668s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/testbus 1.222s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/token 1.035s FAIL ```
jschoubben added 1 commit 2026-10-08 10:23:28 +00:00
Page an answer larger than one message of the bus, and keep overviews brief (hq issue 314)
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it…
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery delivered
mesh/delivery-group group fix/314-a-large-answer-is-paged-not-lost merged: every member is merged
175b28ee42
The client library refuses to send a reply over the bus's max_payload, and the
controller only logged it: conditions and status answered nobody for hours on
2026-10-08 while calls said each was answered in 130 ms, and the operator's
channel read nothing. An answer too large is now held under its call and paged
to the caller that asks, on the same subject; a caller that does not page is
told in words, and calls says it. The overviews no longer carry every finding:
conditions and status list each condition with its newest evidence, doctor at
most twenty findings a probe (probe= gives one whole), and the JSON overviews
are sent once, as data, instead of twice.
jschoubben force-pushed fix/314-a-large-answer-is-paged-not-lost from 4b4311535e to 175b28ee42 2026-10-08 10:23:28 +00:00 Compare
Author
Contributor

Merge check at 175b28ee

  • mesh/merge-gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy)
  • mesh/repo-check: PASS — its merge-check.sh passed

Delivery plan — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step

  • tier 0: mesh-controller
  • tier 1: build-agent
  • tier 2: route-proxy
  • ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy
  • g14: receives build-agent
  • novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy
  • shanks: receives build-agent
  • build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
  • route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it
  • route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves

Run by the build seat on novox as build-1791455032894381325 (builds --log build-1791455032894381325).

--- the gate: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy
mesh-controller: ok, 47 tool(s); WARNING: controller stay(s) up and say(s) not how it is ready — judged by liveness alone, refused from 2026-11-18 (ADR 0240 rule 8)
long-running resources without health: 1
1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here
judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-08T10:14:03Z says they run
composing every machine as the mesh is
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
composing every machine with the change
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued
merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-08T10:14:03Z

machines:
  - a machine (f35): composes
  - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes
  - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes
  - a machine (yvbpsm): composes

a merge would rebuild 3 module(s) in 3 tier(s): build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy
--- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain)
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-builder	1.035s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller	175.071s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/objectstore-provisioner	1.015s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/postgres-provisioner	1.025s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/redis-provisioner	1.015s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/route-proxy	1.129s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/artifacts	1.047s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/broker	2.873s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/builder	2.724s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/catalogue	5.012s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/conditions	2.076s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/envfile	1.027s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/facts	1.032s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/identity	5.124s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/inventory	84.921s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lease	17.684s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences	4.655s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences/adapters	1.011s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/link	46.710s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lint	2.066s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/outward	1.037s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/overlay	1.022s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/secrets	1.506s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/store	3.356s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/testbus	1.199s
ok  	github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/token	1.016s
**Merge check** at `175b28ee` - `mesh/merge-gate`: **PASS** — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) (modules: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy) - `mesh/repo-check`: **PASS** — its merge-check.sh passed **Delivery plan** — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step - tier 0: mesh-controller - tier 1: build-agent - tier 2: route-proxy - ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy - g14: receives build-agent - novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy - shanks: receives build-agent - build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves - route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it - route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves Run by the build seat on novox as `build-1791455032894381325` (`builds --log build-1791455032894381325`). ``` --- the gate: build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy mesh-controller: ok, 47 tool(s); WARNING: controller stay(s) up and say(s) not how it is ready — judged by liveness alone, refused from 2026-11-18 (ADR 0240 rule 8) long-running resources without health: 1 1 manifest(s) checked. Judged against the seats this binary carries; a claim on one of the mesh's own seats is judged fully at registration, and a seat declared by a module not given here reads as unknown. Identities judged on a 6-character machine name, against the bounds of the providers given here judging 0 module(s) changed against 4 machine(s), as the snapshot of 2026-10-08T10:14:03Z says they run composing every machine as the mesh is the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued composing every machine with the change the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued the bus's user list leaves out 5 user(s) the mesh has minted no credential for: controller, node.f35, node.idt, node.ygcyr, node.yvbpsm. Each is a user that cannot connect until one is issued merge gate: PASS — every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose) judged by controller development build against the facts of 2026-10-08T10:14:03Z machines: - a machine (f35): composes - holds mesh-dns-resolver (idt): composes - holds git, holds mesh-artifact-store, holds mesh-broker, holds mesh-catalog, holds mesh-delivery, holds mesh-dns-resolver, holds mesh-store, holds mesh-vault, holds npm-package-registry, the control node, the hub (ygcyr): composes - a machine (yvbpsm): composes a merge would rebuild 3 module(s) in 3 tier(s): build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy --- its merge-check.sh (go toolchain) ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-builder 1.035s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/cmd/mesh-controller 175.071s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/objectstore-provisioner 1.015s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/postgres-provisioner 1.025s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/redis-provisioner 1.015s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/examples/route-proxy 1.129s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/artifacts 1.047s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/broker 2.873s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/builder 2.724s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/catalogue 5.012s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/conditions 2.076s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/envfile 1.027s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/facts 1.032s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/identity 5.124s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/inventory 84.921s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lease 17.684s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences 4.655s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/licences/adapters 1.011s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/link 46.710s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/lint 2.066s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/outward 1.037s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/overlay 1.022s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/secrets 1.506s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/store 3.356s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/testbus 1.199s ok github.com/novox/mesh-controller/internal/token 1.016s ```
mesh-admin merged commit 950562afe1 into main 2026-10-08 11:06:20 +00:00
mesh-admin deleted branch fix/314-a-large-answer-is-paged-not-lost 2026-10-08 11:06:20 +00:00
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
No Reviewers
2 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: novox/mesh-controller#138