Tests only. Nothing in the controller needed changing for hq issue 085: a provider's port already reaches its consumers through a node's ports setting. Nothing said the forge was ordinary, which is how it came to be special and got a port written into a manifest instead.
Over the real catalogue manifests:
the forge's port given on a node reaches what it serves, and defaults to the catalogue's without a setting;
the builder's carried binding takes its port from the node while keeping its scheme, npm path, provision and the module it is with;
provision, from, at and as are refused as settings;
the builder's carried binding starts where the forge serves, so the two halves cannot drift apart in the catalogue.
Merge after mesh-host and before mesh-catalog.
go build ./... && go vet ./... && go test ./... green against a throwaway Postgres.
Tests only. Nothing in the controller needed changing for hq issue 085: a provider's port already reaches its consumers through a node's `ports` setting. Nothing *said* the forge was ordinary, which is how it came to be special and got a port written into a manifest instead.
Over the real catalogue manifests:
- the forge's port given on a node reaches what it serves, and defaults to the catalogue's without a setting;
- the builder's carried binding takes its port from the node while keeping its scheme, npm path, provision and the module it is with;
- `provision`, `from`, `at` and `as` are refused as settings;
- the builder's carried binding starts where the forge serves, so the two halves cannot drift apart in the catalogue.
Merge after mesh-host and before mesh-catalog.
`go build ./... && go vet ./... && go test ./...` green against a throwaway Postgres.
The package registry was the one foundation port not resolved from what its
module serves. Nothing in the controller had to change for it — `ports` on the
forge moves its container, what it serves and what consumers are told, and the
builder's carried binding is settable like any other mergeable file — but
nothing said so, which is how it came to be special in the first place.
Two tests over the catalogue's own manifests: the forge's port is given on a
node and reaches what it serves, and the builder's carried binding takes the
port from the node while keeping who the binding is with.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/085
The builder carries a binding because at genesis nothing provides
`package-registry` to resolve one from; once the forge is a module the same
consumer is told what the forge serves. Nothing held the two to the same number,
so the catalogue could drift into dialling one port before the forge is assigned
and another after.
And `at` is now protected, for the reason it had to be: a setting that moves it
points the builder, and the registry password it sends, at a host somebody else
chose.
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/085
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Tests only. Nothing in the controller needed changing for hq issue 085: a provider's port already reaches its consumers through a node's
portssetting. Nothing said the forge was ordinary, which is how it came to be special and got a port written into a manifest instead.Over the real catalogue manifests:
provision,from,atandasare refused as settings;Merge after mesh-host and before mesh-catalog.
go build ./... && go vet ./... && go test ./...green against a throwaway Postgres.atshut 729537e745