Found live on #54's own rollout: the build agent went to ace first (18:22:31, applied 18:22:43), then to g14 and shanks (18:22:58, applied 18:23:13). The plan then waited for ever on "build-agent on ace to be applied": the tier gate asked every machine for a report after SentAt, which the second send had moved past ace's report.
The gate judges each machine from its own send: the first machines from FirstAt, the rest from SentAt (appliedEach).
A plan's wait is rounded to the second, not the minute (it read 0s).
Test: the first machine's report between the two sends opens the gate; the single-moment reading would not; a report from before a machine's send does not. Full suite with fresh postgres + NATS: no failures. Merging it supersedes the stuck plan (ADR 0218 §3), which is the live test of that too.
Found live on #54's own rollout: the build agent went to ace first (18:22:31, applied 18:22:43), then to g14 and shanks (18:22:58, applied 18:23:13). The plan then waited for ever on "build-agent on ace to be applied": the tier gate asked every machine for a report after `SentAt`, which the second send had moved past ace's report.
- The gate judges each machine from its own send: the first machines from `FirstAt`, the rest from `SentAt` (`appliedEach`).
- A plan's wait is rounded to the second, not the minute (it read `0s`).
Test: the first machine's report between the two sends opens the gate; the single-moment reading would not; a report from before a machine's send does not. Full suite with fresh postgres + NATS: no failures. Merging it supersedes the stuck plan (ADR 0218 §3), which is the live test of that too.
With one machine first a module is sent twice, and the tier gate asked every
machine for a report after the second send: the first machine's report, made
between the two, read as stale and the plan waited for ever (hq issue 256).
Also round a plan's wait to the second, not the minute, so it is not 0s.
build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it
route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
Transitions
2026-10-06 23:05 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-controller#55 merged; its head was not heard by this owner, so it is made from the forge's word
2026-10-06 23:05 proposed → held (merged-unchecked): merged without a passing check — a verdict known with it is taken first: only a person decides that it goes on
The commit's note under refs/notes/mesh-plan keeps every transition: git log --notes=mesh-plan.
<!-- mesh-delivery:view -->
**Delivery** `novox/mesh-controller@6abce7e95684` — **held** since 2026-10-06T23:05:28Z
Held for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides that it goes on — `mesh-delivery.release` with why lets it go on.
**Delivery plan** — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step
- tier 0: mesh-controller
- tier 1: build-agent
- tier 2: route-proxy
- ace: receives build-agent, route-proxy
- g14: receives build-agent
- novox: receives mesh-controller, build-agent, route-proxy
- shanks: receives build-agent
- build-agent keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
- route-proxy provides route: its consumers are sent again after it
- route-proxy keeps data (ADR 0233): what it holds is backed up before it moves
**Transitions**
- 2026-10-06 23:05 (new) → proposed (announced): novox/mesh-controller#55 merged; its head was not heard by this owner, so it is made from the forge's word
- 2026-10-06 23:05 proposed → held (merged-unchecked): merged without a passing check — a verdict known with it is taken first: only a person decides that it goes on
The commit's note under `refs/notes/mesh-plan` keeps every transition: `git log --notes=mesh-plan`.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Found live on #54's own rollout: the build agent went to ace first (18:22:31, applied 18:22:43), then to g14 and shanks (18:22:58, applied 18:23:13). The plan then waited for ever on "build-agent on ace to be applied": the tier gate asked every machine for a report after
SentAt, which the second send had moved past ace's report.FirstAt, the rest fromSentAt(appliedEach).0s).Test: the first machine's report between the two sends opens the gate; the single-moment reading would not; a report from before a machine's send does not. Full suite with fresh postgres + NATS: no failures. Merging it supersedes the stuck plan (ADR 0218 §3), which is the live test of that too.
Delivery
novox/mesh-controller@6abce7e95684— held since 2026-10-06T23:05:28ZHeld for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides that it goes on —
mesh-delivery.releasewith why lets it go on.Delivery plan — builds build-agent, mesh-controller, route-proxy → ace, g14, novox, shanks; no bus step
Transitions
The commit's note under
refs/notes/mesh-plankeeps every transition:git log --notes=mesh-plan.