jschoubben
122680b554
novox/hq 04-ISSUES/023. A consumer was given its password, the address,
the port and where its credential lives, and still could not connect —
the user name was invented by the provisioner and recorded nowhere, and
the rest sat in a JSON binding that a program reading KEY=value cannot
use.
Both halves have the same cause: the mesh knew something and did not say
it.
**Who a consumer is, said once.** The provisioner used to derive
mesh_<node>_<module> and that string existed nowhere else — not in the
control plane, not in the binding, and above all not at the consumer,
which has to present it. Now the mesh derives it once and sends it to
both ends, so they agree by construction rather than by two conventions
that were the same on the day they were written. The provisioners refuse
to invent one if the mesh says nothing, because falling back to a name
of their own would create a role the consumer would never guess and
everything would report success.
**Bound values reach the file that needs them.** ${bound:provision:key}
is the symmetric twin of the sealed placeholder, and simpler: these
values are not secret, so the control plane fills them in before sending
and the host gains no field and learns no format. It stays
name-agnostic — at, as and from are true of any provision, and every
other key comes from what the provider said it serves.
The asymmetry it removes was backwards. The secret is the hard case,
because the mesh must not be able to read it, and the secret was the
part that already arrived.
Keycloak and Gitea now produce complete connections, asserted from the
manifests on disk rather than from fixtures: every part filled, no
placeholder surviving as a value, and the password still a hole only the
host can close. Three faults injected, each caught.
examples
Things that run, kept here because a contract is easier to read as working code than as prose.
Nothing here is part of the control plane. The control plane decides and never touches a machine (README); everything in this directory runs on a machine and touches it. These are reference implementations of contracts the control plane defines, and a real one ships with the module that ships the software it configures.
postgres-provisioner |
the last step of a credential: reads what the mesh delivered and makes PostgreSQL accept it |
Running the provisioner
--watch reconciles now and again whenever what the mesh delivered changes. That is what lets it
be a module: an ordinary long-running service the host supervises, rather than something that has
to be invoked after every declaration by a timer or a unit wired to a file.
It polls rather than watching the filesystem, because the host writes atomically — the file is replaced, so a watch on the path stops seeing anything after the first replacement. A watcher that silently stops working is worse than a poll.
Credentials are compared by digest and never by content. This runs for as long as the machine is up, and a secret does not belong in a long-lived variable when a hash answers the same question.