Archived
jschoubben
5062c36fc9
Two sibling branches resolve a provision answered by the consumer's own machine. The one for a node-scoped provider falls back to loopback when the machine is on no private network, with a comment saying why and a test holding it. The one for a mesh-scoped provider passed node.At straight through, and nothing noticed because nothing had yet composed a host out of it. The mesh's own artifact store is mesh-scoped and sits on the same machine as the builder that pushes to it. Give the builder the address from its binding and it gets MESH_REGISTRY=:5000 — a name with no host, written into its environment without complaint. It surfaces much later as ":5000/mesh-tools/build" is not a valid repository/tag which is a message about a tag for a fault in how a binding was resolved, on a machine several steps from the decision. A machine off the private network still reaches itself, which is what the neighbouring branch already said. The test fails without the fix, showing the empty address rather than only the symptom. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx