The take-in watched the builder's and the indexer's buckets, started a follower
per module that retried on a 30 s timer, and at start took every catalogued
module in alphabetically: on 2026-10-25 a restart took in about 2 modules a
minute, about 190 followers queued behind 16 slots, and every take-in composed
two or three times even with nothing new, so a new build waited 30 minutes and
more for its credential.
Now two durable consumers named mesh-controller-take-in read the indexer's
modules bucket (every module's last trunk value when the consumer is made, then
each write) and the builder's builds bucket (each write), at most 16 keys
unacknowledged each. The bus keeps what is not taken in: the start's look is the
consumers' own catch-up, and a restart costs only what was left unacknowledged.
A batch reads the catalogue once, takes each module in once, and asks the
composer twice: once for its modules' nodes, once for the bus's node with the
grants. A module registered at its trunk whose compositions and grant exist, or
that this process took in at the same trunk, composes nothing; a key delivered
again is taken in whole. A wait for the builder's or indexer's next write is
acknowledged, a wait on a read or a failure refused with a 30 s delay. The
backlog is in status, and a backlog standing still for 5 minutes raises
take-in-stalled. The controller's account is granted the two consumers' acks.
The follower tests go with the followers: twelve tests become three.
Research 072: the take-ins on a bounded pull consumer (milestone 4, done keys
alone) and the start's look composing only what changed (milestone 2).
jschoubben
bfb271a91b