Every module that served a tool was refused the subscription on the new bus: the grant listed tools from a manifest field no module fills, because the tools a module serves are what its code answers and a second copy of that list would be a second source of truth. The grant is now the module's own tool namespace; nothing else may subscribe it, a caller is still granted per tool by name, and a module may answer what it was asked.
341 lines
14 KiB
Go
341 lines
14 KiB
Go
package broker
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"slices"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func has(t *testing.T, subjects []string, want string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
for _, s := range subjects {
|
|
if s == want {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected %q among %v", want, subjects)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func hasNot(t *testing.T, subjects []string, unwanted string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
for _, s := range subjects {
|
|
if s == unwanted {
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not expect %q among %v", unwanted, subjects)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A module's authority comes from its declaration and nothing else (novox/hq ADR 0043).
|
|
func TestAModulePublishesOnlyWhatItEmits(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p := Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "billing",
|
|
Emits: []string{"order.placed"}, PasswordHash: "x"}
|
|
perms, err := PermissionsFor(p)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.billing.event.order.placed")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.billing.>")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.shipping.event.order.placed")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The gap AMQP left open — an emitter granted the events exchange whole — is closed by per-subject
|
|
// permissions. A module cannot publish under another module's name.
|
|
func TestAModuleCannotPublishUnderAnothersName(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "billing",
|
|
Emits: []string{"order.placed"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
for _, p := range perms.Publish {
|
|
if strings.HasPrefix(p, "mesh.mod.") && !strings.HasPrefix(p, "mesh.mod.billing.") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("billing may publish %q, which is not its own namespace", p)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A caller of a seat may publish what the seat accepts, and nothing else of it: not its outbound
|
|
// events, and not a subscription to its inbound queue (design 29 §2).
|
|
func TestUsingASeatIsPublishOnlyAndInboundOnly(t *testing.T) {
|
|
seat := Seat{Name: "telegram-sender", Accepts: []string{"send"}, Emits: []string{"delivered", "failed"}}
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "shop",
|
|
Uses: []Seat{seat}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.accept.send")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.event.delivered")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Subscribe, "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.accept.send")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The holder is the mirror image: it consumes what the seat accepts and publishes what it emits.
|
|
func TestHoldingASeatIsTheMirrorOfUsingIt(t *testing.T) {
|
|
seat := Seat{Name: "telegram-sender", Accepts: []string{"send"}, Emits: []string{"delivered", "failed"}}
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "telegram",
|
|
Holds: []Seat{seat}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
has(t, perms.Subscribe, "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.accept.send")
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.event.delivered")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.seat.telegram-sender.accept.send")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Without an ack permission a durable consumer never really consumes: every message it receives is
|
|
// redelivered forever, refused by the permission list it already has (design 25 §4).
|
|
func TestAModuleMayAckItsOwnDeliveriesAndNoOthers(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "billing",
|
|
Consumes: []string{"shop.order.placed"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "$JS.ACK.EVENTS.one_billing.>")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "$JS.ACK.>")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "$JS.ACK.EVENTS.one_shop.>")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With one account, inbox privacy is the permission list or it is nothing.
|
|
func TestAnInboxIsScopedToItsOwner(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "billing", PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
has(t, perms.Subscribe, "_INBOX.one.billing.>")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Subscribe, "_INBOX.>")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Subscribe, "_INBOX.one.shop.>")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A responder answers on the caller's inbox, which it has no permission for. allow_responses is
|
|
// what makes a scoped inbox workable at all — the authority is bounded by having been asked. A
|
|
// module is asked on its own namespace and may answer; a node and a person are never asked.
|
|
func TestOnlyWhatCanBeAskedMayAnswer(t *testing.T) {
|
|
module, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "audit",
|
|
Consumes: []string{"shop.order.placed"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if !module.AllowResponses {
|
|
t.Fatal("a module cannot answer a tool call on its own namespace")
|
|
}
|
|
node, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindNode, Node: "one", PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if node.AllowResponses {
|
|
t.Fatal("a node was granted the right to answer, and nothing asks a node anything")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A module serves every tool under its own name, and no other module's.
|
|
func TestAModuleServesItsOwnNamespaceAndNoOthers(t *testing.T) {
|
|
p, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "gitea", PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if !slices.Contains(p.Subscribe, "mesh.mod.gitea.tool.>") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("a module may not serve its own tools: %v", p.Subscribe)
|
|
}
|
|
for _, s := range p.Subscribe {
|
|
if strings.HasPrefix(s, "mesh.mod.") && !strings.HasPrefix(s, "mesh.mod.gitea.") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("a module may subscribe another's namespace: %s", s)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A host reaches its own node's control traffic and its own declaration, and nothing of any
|
|
// other node's.
|
|
func TestAHostIsConfinedToItsOwnNode(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindNode, Node: "one", PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.control.one.>")
|
|
has(t, perms.Subscribe, "mesh.node.one.declare")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Subscribe, "mesh.node.two.declare")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Subscribe, "mesh.node.>")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A leaked enrolment token is useless for anything but enrolling (design 25 §6).
|
|
func TestTheEnrolmentUserCanOnlyEnrol(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, err := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindEnrolment, Node: "anchor", PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(perms.Publish) != 1 || perms.Publish[0] != "mesh.control.enrol" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("enrolment may publish %v", perms.Publish)
|
|
}
|
|
// Its own inbox and nothing else. **Nothing else** is the point: no declaration, no event, and
|
|
// no other machine's answer — and the inbox itself is needed, because a node that cannot
|
|
// subscribe one waits out its timeout against a mesh that answered.
|
|
if len(perms.Subscribe) != 1 || perms.Subscribe[0] != "_INBOX.enrol.anchor.>" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("enrolment may subscribe %v, which is not its own inbox alone", perms.Subscribe)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// An enrolment user that names no node is refused: its inbox would be an empty subject token, and
|
|
// one that every nameless enrolment user shared — which is one machine reading the credentials
|
|
// sealed to another.
|
|
func TestAnEnrolmentUserWithoutANodeIsRefused(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if _, err := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindEnrolment, PasswordHash: "x"}); err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("an enrolment user with no node was composed, so its inbox is shared")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A name that would widen a permission is refused rather than quietly stretching one.
|
|
func TestANameThatWouldWidenAPermissionIsRefused(t *testing.T) {
|
|
for _, bad := range []string{"bill.ing", "billing.>", "*", "bil>ling"} {
|
|
if _, err := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: bad, PasswordHash: "x"}); err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("%q was accepted as part of a subject", bad)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The entrypoint reloads on the file's digest changing, so an unchanged mesh must compose an
|
|
// identical file — otherwise every controller restart signals a reload of the whole bus.
|
|
func TestComposingTwiceGivesTheSameBytes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
s := Server{ClientPort: 4222, MonitoringPort: 8222, StoreDir: "/data",
|
|
TLSCert: "/tls/tls.crt", TLSKey: "/tls/tls.key", TLSCA: "/tls/ca.crt"}
|
|
ps := []Principal{
|
|
{Kind: KindModule, Node: "two", Module: "shop", Emits: []string{"order.placed"}, PasswordHash: "b"},
|
|
{Kind: KindController, PasswordHash: "c"},
|
|
{Kind: KindModule, Node: "one", Module: "billing", Consumes: []string{"shop.order.placed"}, PasswordHash: "a"},
|
|
}
|
|
first, err := Compose(s, ps)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
shuffled := []Principal{ps[2], ps[0], ps[1]}
|
|
second, err := Compose(s, shuffled)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if first != second {
|
|
t.Fatal("composition is order-dependent; every controller restart would reload the bus")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A user without a password is a user anybody is.
|
|
func TestAUserWithoutAPasswordIsRefused(t *testing.T) {
|
|
_, err := Compose(Server{ClientPort: 4222}, []Principal{{Kind: KindController}})
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("composed a user with no password hash")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A person reaches the mesh's tools from a workstation (design 25 §7). Their authority is a list
|
|
// of tools and nothing else.
|
|
func TestAPersonMayAskOnlyTheToolsTheyWereGiven(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, err := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "jo",
|
|
Invokes: []string{"shop.price", "telegram.status"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.shop.tool.price")
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.telegram.tool.status")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.shop.tool.refund")
|
|
hasNot(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.*.tool.>")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// An administrator gets every tool, which is a different grant and looks like one.
|
|
func TestAnAdministratorMayAskAnyTool(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "jo",
|
|
Invokes: []string{"*"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
has(t, perms.Publish, "mesh.mod.*.tool.>")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// **Nothing but tools.** A person who could publish an event would be able to claim a module
|
|
// said something; one who could publish control traffic would be a second controller.
|
|
func TestAPersonReachesNothingButTools(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "jo",
|
|
Invokes: []string{"*"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
for _, p := range perms.Publish {
|
|
if !strings.Contains(p, ".tool.") {
|
|
t.Errorf("a person may publish %q, which is not a tool call", p)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
for _, s := range perms.Subscribe {
|
|
if !strings.HasPrefix(s, "_INBOX.person.") {
|
|
t.Errorf("a person may subscribe %q; only their own inbox should be reachable", s)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A person has no durable consumer, because nothing is delivered to a person — so no ack
|
|
// subject, and an ack permission would be authority over something that does not exist.
|
|
func TestAPersonHasNoAckSubject(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "jo",
|
|
Invokes: []string{"*"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
for _, p := range perms.Publish {
|
|
if strings.HasPrefix(p, "$JS.ACK") {
|
|
t.Errorf("a person was granted %q, and has no consumer to acknowledge", p)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A person asks and is answered; they never answer. allow_responses would let a person reply to
|
|
// a request — which, on a bus where anyone may serve a tool, is somebody impersonating a module.
|
|
func TestAPersonMayNotAnswer(t *testing.T) {
|
|
perms, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "jo",
|
|
Invokes: []string{"*"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if perms.AllowResponses {
|
|
t.Fatal("a person may answer a request, which is impersonating a module")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Two people do not share an inbox, or one would read the other's answers.
|
|
func TestTwoPeopleDoNotShareAnInbox(t *testing.T) {
|
|
a, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "jo", Invokes: []string{"*"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
b, _ := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "sam", Invokes: []string{"*"}, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if a.Subscribe[0] == b.Subscribe[0] {
|
|
t.Fatalf("both read %s", a.Subscribe[0])
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A malformed grant is refused rather than widened into something that happens to parse.
|
|
func TestAToolGrantThatNamesNoToolIsRefused(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if _, err := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindPerson, Module: "jo",
|
|
Invokes: []string{"shop"}, PasswordHash: "x"}); err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("a grant naming a module but no tool was accepted")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The controller can answer an enrolment, and reach no other inbox.
|
|
//
|
|
// **`allow_responses` does not cover this and that is the trap.** It permits one reply to the reply
|
|
// subject of a message the user received — and a message a JetStream consumer delivers has had that
|
|
// field claimed for the consumer's own ack address, so the address the controller actually answers is
|
|
// the one the request carried in its payload, which the server does not recognise as a reply subject
|
|
// at all.
|
|
//
|
|
// Found against a real server, after a live test on an *unpermissioned* one had passed: every
|
|
// enrolment on the mesh would have timed out while the controller logged success.
|
|
func TestTheControllerCanAnswerAnEnrolmentAndReachNoOtherInbox(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ctl, err := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindController, PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
enrolling, err := PermissionsFor(Principal{Kind: KindEnrolment, Node: "anchor", PasswordHash: "x"})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Whatever the enrolling node waits on, the controller must be able to publish to.
|
|
if len(enrolling.Subscribe) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("an enrolling node subscribes %v, and this test knows only how to check one",
|
|
enrolling.Subscribe)
|
|
}
|
|
waitsOn := enrolling.Subscribe[0]
|
|
if !covers(ctl.Publish, waitsOn) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("the controller may publish %v, none of which reaches %s — so every enrolment on "+
|
|
"the mesh times out while the controller logs success", ctl.Publish, waitsOn)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// And nothing wider. A node's own inbox and a module's are not the controller's to write into:
|
|
// that is the blanket grant design 25 §4 refuses.
|
|
for _, other := range []string{"_INBOX.node.anchor.x", "_INBOX.one.shop.x", "_INBOX.person.ada.x"} {
|
|
if covers(ctl.Publish, other) {
|
|
t.Errorf("the controller can publish to %s, which is an inbox privacy the permission "+
|
|
"list is the only thing protecting", other)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// covers says whether any granted subject pattern admits one concrete subject, with NATS's own
|
|
// wildcard meanings: `*` is one token, `>` is the rest.
|
|
func covers(granted []string, subject string) bool {
|
|
want := strings.Split(subject, ".")
|
|
for _, pattern := range granted {
|
|
if admits(strings.Split(pattern, "."), want) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func admits(pattern, subject []string) bool {
|
|
for i, token := range pattern {
|
|
if token == ">" {
|
|
return i < len(subject)
|
|
}
|
|
if i >= len(subject) {
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
if token != "*" && token != subject[i] {
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return len(pattern) == len(subject)
|
|
}
|