Two robustness fixes to the ADR 0083 cascade, from an adversarial review:
- It routed swept machines through sendTo, which is all-or-nothing — so
one swept machine's compose error failed the operator's named push and
skipped its --wait, the intolerance the main path exists to avoid
(ADR 0066). It now composes them through composeEach, exactly as the
named send does: a machine that cannot be worked out is a refusal in
the final report, and the rest are still sent. composeEach's tolerance
is already covered by TestOneUnresolvableNodeStillLetsTheRestBeSent.
- The fixed 4-round cap could stop a real cascade short in silence. The
loop is now bounded by the node count (a node is flushed once and never
revisited, so it cannot run longer) and says so if the guard is ever
hit, rather than passing over an unfinished cascade quietly.
Scope is unchanged: a named push still flushes every machine left behind,
per ADR 0083 as accepted.
jschoubben
d6ee77f17c