Archived
A module is one piece of software and may still carry a daemon in one language, tools in another and a package in a third. The first cut compiled every bundle into the toolchain's single output directory, so two of them would have overwritten each other and then been packed together — one artifact containing both, published twice. So output is a property of the artifact, not of the toolchain, and the toolchain says how it is told where to write rather than where it writes. Under a directory named for the build rather than beside the source, so a pack never sweeps up the module's own working files. A second toolchain is declared so the multi-language path is exercised rather than asserted — a list with one entry cannot fail the way a list with four will. And the fake compiler in the tests now writes where it was TOLD to. One that always wrote to a fixed place would have passed whether or not each artifact got its own directory, which is the whole of what these tests are for. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx