mesh-sdk holds no go/asks, go/asker, vault answers or compose-candidate types (A1d, J1): each module now names the
operator-channel contract and client, the channel benches (mesh-sdk/go/channel), mesh-vault's contract, and node-engine's
contract and client (a1-progress.md, the A1d and J1 rewrite maps).
- assigner, teller, view: delivery.Ask.Ask and AssignerAsk.Ask are the router's ask as JSON; the refusals mesh-sdk
dropped (an id other than AskingID(key, asking), no option) are each reader's and writer's: assign.EncodeAsk/DecodeAsk
(askjson.go), the teller's routerAskOf (teller.go) and the view's routerAsk (view.go); the teller refuses an option
the asking does not offer and one whose level is not acknowledge (viewanswers.go), the two refusals ViewAnswerFits
gave. Row: subtest of TestTheHoldAskIsValid (another id, no option, no ask; each written before).
- enrolment, grants: the vault's verbs and answers from meshvault; asks' conditions from the contract and client.
- checker, assigner's judge: compose-candidate from nodeengine/nodeengineclient (nec.Own for "node").
- mesh-grants' user-lists golden: the node-engine's users now subscribe to mesh-delivery-view's settled (mesh-sdk's
NodeAgentHears, A7's ENG-8 retry).
go.mod: each module requires the mesh-contracts modules it imports (and nodeengineclient, which mesh-sdk imports) at the
zero version, for the group pin.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
ADR 0590 clause 3 ends the choice of a condition source by the keeper's
take-over key, which mesh-sdk no longer defines. The assigner watched
that key and said every condition straight to the router while it named
the controller. It now writes each as a finding the keeper carries, and
says one straight only where it has no findings bucket at all.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
Every handed-away branch is the only one: world.assigned is the placement, the pair comparison and its conditions go, the
lease and assignments buckets are no longer opened, watched or declared, and a proposal of any kind is taken.
Tests: the pair-comparison test and the controller-composition record-ask test are replaced by one placement test; the
rest are edited to place their modules instead of assigning them.
(issue 774, 774/S26)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The node's own composition gives up every module with a fingerprint of the new form, so such a module is applied only through its
want. The assigner wrote no want while a rule held it back and the node had none, so clipmenu, screen-lock, i3status-rust and every
module requiring x11-display lay on neither list on g14 and shanks: xorg's health is unknown (rule 5) and the canary never ran them
healthy (rule 3), and their files were removed and never made again.
A node that runs a module and has no want for it now gets its first want by the rules without which there is nothing to want (built,
not held, granted, composed); the canary and providers rules order every move after it. Any module still on neither list is raised
as an urgent condition naming module, node and rule, written to the journal, and cleared once it has a want (1945/AC19-AC21).
Seven modules stayed held on every machine and the operator was never asked:
the teller only filled assigner asks from the view, a single failed check held
a fingerprint for good, and the held record kept no cause. The teller now asks
every assigner ask as it asks merge asks and writes the phone's answer under
the ask's key; the assigner lifts a hold whose fingerprint runs healthy on
every node that runs the module, says so once and takes its ask back; the held
record names health, phase, when and the node's words.
jschoubben