ADR 0590 §3 ends the choice of a condition source by the keeper's
take-over key: the controller is unassigned and the keeper is the one
source. The part still read the take-over key, fell back to the
controller's condition events when it was absent, and read and watched
the controller's lease, which nothing writes any more. It now hears the
keeper's events alone and reads neither.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The controller ended by its unassignment (ADR 0590), which supersedes the
lease write and its hand-back whole and makes the grants part's list the
only one the bus node follows. The lease write, its check, the removal
marker, the take-over and hand-back asks, their five tools, the seat
claim and the lease and takeover states had nothing left to act on; the
membership notice on its subject had no reader. A whole-module test on
the bus replaces the lease write's: with no controller at all, the part
publishes a membership in its state alone, makes the module's consumer
and writes the key the bus node follows.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0583 §1 (insight 2026-11-01) and §2: the grants part reads the vault's node-logins as its named reader and
composes a node user per login, both while the node rotates and the new one alone after rotation-done; each node's
engine reads its own node's key alone (composed by mesh-sdk while the vault serves rotate-node). The part follows the
state by watch, so a rotation begun or ended composes again at once. A second login is judged its node's when the
list is compared (Placed), and a hash changing by a rotation node-logins names is not counted as a writer changing
several hashes at once (sealed.go). The state not on the bus yet is a standing gap: every node logs in as node.<n>,
as today. Tested as a subtest of TestGrants, no new test function. Built against the group's mesh-sdk head 5000774
through a go.work outside the worktree; the pin is the lead's.
(issue 774, 774/S53)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0587 §4: the grants part composes enrol.<node> from a key at live and the vault's hash, granted only the seat's
redeem and its own inbox; §5: when the key ends the user goes. The part reads mesh-enrolment.enrolments as its named
reader and follows it by watch: a key reaching live composes the user, and its end (by the holder, or by the bus at
its expiry) is a change of the key that takes it out, so no consume of the seat's ending events is added beside the
watch (the subtask named one; the watch already hears every end, the bus's expiry included). From the lease write the
user loses the controller's enrolment subject (§6) and the standing gap of the controller's tokens is dropped; before
it the gap stands. Tested as a subtest of TestGrants, no new test function. Built against the group's mesh-sdk head
5000774 through a go.work outside the worktree; the pin is the lead's.
(issue 774, 774/S52)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0549 §5, ADR 0564 §9, ADR 0571 §10: the part no longer reads mesh-controller.assignments (the union with
placement goes; placement not read is a failed read that places nothing) nor consumes the controller's
condition-raised and condition-cleared, the keeper's being the one source. ADR 0571 §13's test for this
repository replaces the guard of ADR 0549 §6 and its list ../assignments-readers, now empty and deleted: at
phase write no module.json here depends on mesh-controller beyond the lease and the three kept to the write
(catalogue.ManifestRefusals).
Tests: in TestGrants the fixture places through the seat's placement (assign, unassign), the subtest of the
stale assignments becomes 774/S29/AC1 (placement alone gives the fixture's three memberships with no read,
consume or call of the controller; the fixture is the suite's own, whose assignments named the same modules,
not a copy of live memberships), and the assignments-readers subtest becomes 774/S24/AC1. No new test function.
(issue 774, 774/S29, 774/S24)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0582: lease-write is refused, naming each check, until the lease check at phase write and every condition
of clause 2 read green (design 47's earlier issues resolved, every node trusting the vault's key, mesh-config's
compare empty from the indexer, the upgrade compare empty, the keeper's take-over done, the vault minting with
nothing held back, the bus module listing its expiry and removal tools). It asks the operator once; the yes
binds the act, the holder, the ask and the checks' digest, and the checks are read again on the warrant (one
that reads otherwise refuses it, named). Then, each step read back: node-service-manager.stop on the
controller's node, the list composed with Records.LeaseCut and waited on until the bus node's have says it
loaded it, the expiry removed through nats_bucket_expiry, the key holder written (with the ask and the time),
lease-handed said, the act recorded through mesh-hand-acts.warranted, and removal-due written with a day to
live. lease-altered is said once when the key or the expiry differs; lease-hand-back reverses it for a day
and is refused once the removal ran; removal-due's marker alone starts the removal of the controller's
consumer and the stream ASSIGNMENTS, recorded as hand acts, and a failure says removal-failed and writes the
key again with a day (grants_removal_due is the recovery for a missed marker). From the write memberships are
written to the state alone (ADR 0571 clause 10), the user-list key says lease-handed, and the user list's
hand-back answers gone (ADR 0547 §11). Every step waits on an event, never a timer.
Bent rule: S14-S21 are one commit, not eight: the steps are one state machine in leasewrite.go, and splitting
it by hunks would review the same file eight times for nothing it protects.
Tests: TestTheLeaseWrite (new, one function with a subtest per subtask), paid by the deletion of
TestTheKeepListNamesItsRecordsAndThreeToTheWrite (moved to mesh-sdk, S4/S30) and the assigner's two deletions
(S25). Fixtures shaped from each writer's code: systemd's Manager.Status, nats-tools' BucketExpirySet,
ConsumerRemoved and StreamRemoved, mesh-issues' Brief, mesh-delivery-view's TrustsAnswer, mesh-config's
Comparison, the assigner's upgrade compare, mesh-vault's vault_status.
(issue 774, 774/S14, 774/S15, 774/S16, 774/S17, 774/S18, 774/S19, 774/S20, 774/S21)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
The operator asked to remove the controller by finishing its hand-over; no tool said who holds
the lease, which manifests still read, invoke or consume mesh-controller, or whether the lease
write's check (ADR 0571 §13) would pass. grants_lease_check answers all three from bus state on
the grants part, which already reads the lease, every manifest at the indexer's trunk and the
bus's streams: the holder and what follows from it, every dependency with the record on the
named keep list that keeps it, the controller's streams and buckets someone consumes, and the
check run dry at the write (the three kept to it alone) and before its delivery, with reasons.
Quick fix: the judgement and the keep list in the grants part, as here.
Thorough fix: the keep list and the dependency derivation in mesh-sdk, shared by this tool and
the §13 manifest tests in mesh-catalog, mesh-delivery and mesh-tools. Chosen quick: the tests do
not exist yet and an sdk move needs a group; the move is named for the lead.
Why: the assigner switches its grants source when the controller's lease is handed away; until then the written keys are compared with the controller's, so the switch rests on a measured equality. Needs the group's mesh-sdk pin (PartGrantKey) before it builds.
The part composed every membership with no root-free input, so telegram's verified-sender was dropped and the membership held as a shadow
difference. It now asks mesh-controller.root-free for the machines a composition needs, per pass, failing closed and said once, and wakes
on root-not-free condition-raised and condition-cleared.
mesh/check checking 12f16bbebd40 on 13380e3d0e52 | novox/mesh-delivery#58 in group fix/1790-grants-create-buckets
A module's new state reached the bus only when the controller started (issue 1790, met three
times: puts, queues, mesh-vault's bus-accounts). The operator allowed one more grant in the
controller's composer on 2026-10-26 08:54, creation only: the part's process now creates each
bucket, log or stream a placed module's manifest declares and the bus lacks, with the same
configuration the controller asserts (mesh-sdk BucketStreamConfig, Log.Config,
ModuleStreamConfig), on the event that brought the manifest, never on a timer. It says asserted
and logs one line per module; a stream the bus holds is never updated or deleted, its difference
only said; a create refused is said and tried at the next event; one created at this manifest
and gone since is made again only by hand. grants_assert asks the process to do the same for one
module now. The user list, the grants and any change to a held stream stay in shadow. mesh-sdk
moves to fix/1790-grants-create-buckets, whose composer grants this, so the shadow list is
composed as the controller's.
Issue: 1790
mesh/check pass 9132b6a296b9 on 13380e3d0e52 | unit 168 run, 473 kept | integration 178 run, 539 kept | composition passed in 36ms on novox
ADR 0547 clause 9: the vault writes the hash of each bus account it holds into bus-accounts.<user>. The grants part
watches that state (no timer), carries the hash with each shadow user in memory only, and its user-list tool says per
user whether a hash is held and how its line would differ from the loaded one (same, adds, left out for want of a
credential, loses its login); never the hash, since bcrypt salts make two hashes incomparable. Take-over names the
users with no hash.
Issue: 1945
Since release 6 nobody publishes memberships, so a module placed since cannot serve its seat
or reach a new state (the operator, 2026-10-25 22:31). The part publishes each membership on
the assignments stream only when it differs from the one last published, composes from the
manifest the wanted build names, and says a refused publish and tries again at the next event.
Pins mesh-sdk 881da7f, whose composer grants mesh-grants that publish.
The grants part must compose with the controller's own composer before it can take over the
list; in shadow it proves the two agree, names every input the bus does not carry yet, and
takes no effect. It claims no seat (mesh-sdk's seat list does not name mesh-grants for the
running composer), serves module tools, and keeps running when a read or write is refused.
jschoubben