diff --git a/internal/apply/opening.go b/internal/apply/opening.go
index ff6ee1c..95012e9 100644
--- a/internal/apply/opening.go
+++ b/internal/apply/opening.go
@@ -85,12 +85,18 @@ func applyOpening(ctx context.Context, o *declaration.Opening, run Runner, kind
 		out.Detail = "no firewall found; nothing filters this port"
 		return out, nil
 	case firewall.UFW:
-		action, err := firewall.Converge(ctx, run, o)
+		done, err := firewall.Converge(ctx, run, o)
 		if err != nil {
 			return out, err
 		}
-		out.Action = action
+		out.Action = done.Action
 		out.Detail = "through ufw, marked " + firewall.Mark(o)
+		if done.SatisfiedBy != "" {
+			// ufw would take a rule differing only in its comment for the same one, so the
+			// mesh's is not added beside it (novox/hq ADR 0103).
+			out.Detail = "satisfied by a rule found in ufw (" + done.SatisfiedBy +
+				"); the mesh added nothing and will remove nothing"
+		}
 		return out, nil
 	}
 	return out, fmt.Errorf("no firewall is known for this node, so %s cannot be opened", o.Target())
diff --git a/internal/apply/opening_test.go b/internal/apply/opening_test.go
index f4dc76d..c02aa79 100644
--- a/internal/apply/opening_test.go
+++ b/internal/apply/opening_test.go
@@ -287,3 +287,20 @@ func TestAFlipThatFailsKeepsTheGuardAndTheOpenings(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Error("the guard is still recorded after the completed flip")
 	}
 }
+
+func TestAnOpeningAFoundRuleAnswersIsReportedSatisfied(t *testing.T) {
+	// novox/hq ADR 0103: the mesh adds nothing beside a rule ufw would take for the same one.
+	dir := t.TempDir()
+	u := &ufwMachine{installed: true, active: true, rules: []string{"allow 22/tcp", "allow 5671/tcp"}}
+	report, _, err := applyWith(t, adopted(t, `{"taken":[]}`, busOpening+","+withConf(dir)), store.State{}, u.run)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatal(err)
+	}
+	o := outcomeOf(report, "adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming")
+	if o.Action != "unchanged" || !strings.Contains(o.Detail, "satisfied by a rule found in ufw (allow 5671/tcp)") {
+		t.Errorf("the opening was not reported satisfied: %+v", o)
+	}
+	if len(u.rules) != 2 || u.index("ufw allow") >= 0 {
+		t.Errorf("a rule was added beside the found one: %v", u.rules)
+	}
+}
diff --git a/internal/firewall/firewall.go b/internal/firewall/firewall.go
index d2630c3..fdc52db 100644
--- a/internal/firewall/firewall.go
+++ b/internal/firewall/firewall.go
@@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ func Refusing(ruleset string, ufwActive bool) []string {
 	type rule struct{ table, chain, line string }
 	type chainOf struct {
 		base, dropping, accepts bool
-		policyLine            string
-		jumpedFrom            []string
+		policyLine              string
+		jumpedFrom              []string
 	}
 	chains := map[string]*chainOf{} // by "table\x00chain"
 	tableAccepts := map[string]bool{}
@@ -469,17 +469,195 @@ func words(rule string) []string {
 	return out
 }
 
+// A ufw rule, as `ufw show added` prints it or as it is given, reduced to what ufw compares.
+//
+// **ufw treats two rules that differ only in their comment as one rule.** Measured on a lab
+// machine (testdata/ufw-comment-only.txt): adding `route allow proto tcp to any port 8080 comment
+// 'mesh-host …'` beside an operator's `route allow 8080/tcp` answers "Rule updated", and the
+// operator's rule now carries the mesh's mark — so removing the opening later would delete the
+// operator's rule. The same holds for an incoming rule and for one with a comment of its own.
+type ufwRule struct {
+	route              bool
+	action, in, out    string
+	from, fromPort, to string
+	port, proto, app   string
+	comment            string
+}
+
+// parseRule reads a rule in either of ufw's forms — the short `allow 22/tcp` and the long `allow
+// in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp` — into the fields ufw compares. Not ok for anything it
+// does not recognise, which is then never taken to answer an opening.
+func parseRule(rule string) (ufwRule, bool) {
+	w := words(rule)
+	r := ufwRule{from: "any", to: "any", comment: comment(rule)}
+	i := 0
+	if i < len(w) && w[i] == "route" {
+		r.route = true
+		i++
+	}
+	if i >= len(w) {
+		return r, false
+	}
+	switch w[i] {
+	case "allow", "deny", "reject", "limit":
+		r.action = w[i]
+	default:
+		return r, false
+	}
+	i++
+	for i < len(w) && (w[i] == "in" || w[i] == "out") {
+		dir := w[i]
+		i++
+		iface := ""
+		if i+1 < len(w) && w[i] == "on" {
+			iface = w[i+1]
+			i += 2
+		}
+		if dir == "in" {
+			r.in = iface
+		} else {
+			r.out = iface
+		}
+	}
+	if i < len(w) && w[i] != "from" && w[i] != "to" && w[i] != "proto" && w[i] != "comment" &&
+		w[i] != "app" && w[i] != "log" && w[i] != "log-all" {
+		// The short form: a port with its protocol, a bare port, or an application's name.
+		port, proto, hasProto := strings.Cut(w[i], "/")
+		if isPorts(port) {
+			r.port = port
+			if hasProto {
+				r.proto = proto
+			}
+		} else {
+			r.app = w[i]
+		}
+		i++
+	}
+	for ; i < len(w); i++ {
+		next := func() string {
+			if i+1 < len(w) {
+				i++
+				return w[i]
+			}
+			return ""
+		}
+		switch w[i] {
+		case "from":
+			r.from = next()
+			if i+1 < len(w) && w[i+1] == "port" {
+				i++
+				r.fromPort = next()
+			}
+		case "to":
+			r.to = next()
+			if i+1 < len(w) && w[i+1] == "port" {
+				i++
+				r.port = next()
+			}
+		case "port":
+			r.port = next()
+		case "proto":
+			r.proto = next()
+		case "app":
+			r.app = next()
+		case "comment":
+			next()
+		case "log", "log-all":
+		default:
+			return r, false
+		}
+	}
+	if r.proto == "any" {
+		r.proto = ""
+	}
+	return r, true
+}
+
+func isPorts(s string) bool {
+	if s == "" {
+		return false
+	}
+	for _, c := range s {
+		if (c < '0' || c > '9') && c != ':' && c != ',' {
+			return false
+		}
+	}
+	return true
+}
+
+// sameAs is whether ufw would take two rules for one — everything but the comment equal.
+func (r ufwRule) sameAs(o ufwRule) bool {
+	r.comment, o.comment = "", ""
+	return r == o
+}
+
+// admits is whether a rule already lets through what an opening says: the same path, allowed from
+// any source to any address of this machine, on the opening's port and protocol — or on any
+// protocol — and on any interface, or the private network's for an opening from it.
+func (r ufwRule) admits(o *declaration.Opening) bool {
+	want, ok := parseRule(strings.Join(Rule(o), " "))
+	if !ok || r.route != want.route || r.action != "allow" || r.out != "" || r.app != "" ||
+		r.from != "any" || r.fromPort != "" || r.to != "any" {
+		return false
+	}
+	if r.proto != "" && r.proto != want.proto {
+		return false
+	}
+	if r.in != "" && r.in != want.in {
+		return false
+	}
+	return portsInclude(r.port, want.port)
+}
+
+// portsInclude is whether a ufw port list — 80, 80,443, or 8000:8100 — names a port.
+func portsInclude(list, port string) bool {
+	p, err := strconv.Atoi(port)
+	if err != nil {
+		return false
+	}
+	for _, part := range strings.Split(list, ",") {
+		lo, hi, isRange := strings.Cut(part, ":")
+		a, err := strconv.Atoi(lo)
+		if err != nil {
+			continue
+		}
+		b := a
+		if isRange {
+			if b, err = strconv.Atoi(hi); err != nil {
+				continue
+			}
+		}
+		if a <= p && p <= b {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}
+
+// Converged is what converging an opening did. SatisfiedBy names the rule already there that
+// answers the opening, when one does; the mesh then adds nothing, and so will remove nothing.
+type Converged struct {
+	Action      string
+	SatisfiedBy string
+}
+
 // Converge makes one opening true in ufw: its marked rule present, and any rule marked for it that
 // no longer describes it deleted. Nothing unmarked is touched. The outcome is created, updated or
 // unchanged, read back from ufw rather than assumed.
-func Converge(ctx context.Context, run Runner, o *declaration.Opening) (string, error) {
+//
+// **An opening a rule already answers is not added** (novox/hq ADR 0103). If ufw holds a rule not
+// marked for this opening that already admits what it says — the operator's, or one the mesh
+// added for another opening — the opening is satisfied by it: adding the mesh's would take that
+// rule over if it differs only in its comment, and removing the opening would then delete it.
+func Converge(ctx context.Context, run Runner, o *declaration.Opening) (Converged, error) {
 	rules, err := added(ctx, run)
 	if err != nil {
-		return "", err
+		return Converged{}, err
 	}
 	mark := Mark(o)
 	present := false
 	var stale []string
+	satisfiedBy := ""
 	for _, rule := range rules {
 		c := comment(rule)
 		switch {
@@ -487,25 +665,45 @@ func Converge(ctx context.Context, run Runner, o *declaration.Opening) (string,
 			present = true
 		case markedFor(c, o.ID):
 			stale = append(stale, rule)
+		default:
+			if parsed, ok := parseRule(rule); ok && satisfiedBy == "" && parsed.admits(o) {
+				satisfiedBy = rule
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	if present && len(stale) == 0 {
-		return "unchanged", nil
+		return Converged{Action: "unchanged"}, nil
 	}
 	for _, rule := range stale {
 		if _, err := run(ctx, "ufw", deletion(rule)...); err != nil {
-			return "", fmt.Errorf("deleting the mesh's stale ufw rule %q: %w", rule, err)
+			return Converged{}, fmt.Errorf("deleting the mesh's stale ufw rule %q: %w", rule, err)
 		}
 	}
+	if !present && satisfiedBy != "" {
+		after, err := added(ctx, run)
+		if err != nil {
+			return Converged{}, err
+		}
+		for _, rule := range after {
+			if markedFor(comment(rule), o.ID) {
+				return Converged{}, fmt.Errorf("ufw still lists a stale rule marked for %s after deleting it", o.ID)
+			}
+		}
+		action := "unchanged"
+		if len(stale) > 0 {
+			action = "updated"
+		}
+		return Converged{Action: action, SatisfiedBy: satisfiedBy}, nil
+	}
 	if !present {
 		args := append(Rule(o), "comment", mark)
 		if _, err := run(ctx, "ufw", args...); err != nil {
-			return "", fmt.Errorf("adding the ufw rule for %s: %w", o.Target(), err)
+			return Converged{}, fmt.Errorf("adding the ufw rule for %s: %w", o.Target(), err)
 		}
 	}
 	after, err := added(ctx, run)
 	if err != nil {
-		return "", err
+		return Converged{}, err
 	}
 	found, leftover := false, 0
 	for _, rule := range after {
@@ -517,15 +715,15 @@ func Converge(ctx context.Context, run Runner, o *declaration.Opening) (string,
 		}
 	}
 	if !found {
-		return "", fmt.Errorf("ufw was asked for %s and does not list it afterwards", o.Target())
+		return Converged{}, fmt.Errorf("ufw was asked for %s and does not list it afterwards", o.Target())
 	}
 	if leftover > 0 {
-		return "", fmt.Errorf("ufw still lists %d stale rule(s) marked for %s after deleting them", leftover, o.ID)
+		return Converged{}, fmt.Errorf("ufw still lists %d stale rule(s) marked for %s after deleting them", leftover, o.ID)
 	}
 	if len(stale) > 0 {
-		return "updated", nil
+		return Converged{Action: "updated"}, nil
 	}
-	return "created", nil
+	return Converged{Action: "created"}, nil
 }
 
 // Remove deletes the rules marked for one opening, and nothing else.
diff --git a/internal/firewall/firewall_test.go b/internal/firewall/firewall_test.go
index 878fc71..33e88ad 100644
--- a/internal/firewall/firewall_test.go
+++ b/internal/firewall/firewall_test.go
@@ -151,14 +151,17 @@ func (f *fakeUFW) iptables(name string, args []string) (string, error) {
 	return strings.Join(out, "\n") + "\n", nil
 }
 
-func canonical(args []string) string {
-	var route, in, port, proto, comment string
+// canonical is a rule the way ufw prints it back, as captured (testdata/ufw-comment-only.txt): the
+// short form `allow 5671/tcp` for a rule on no interface, the long form `allow in on mesh0 to any
+// port 5432 proto tcp` for one on an interface; the comment last.
+func canonical(args []string) (rule, commentText string) {
+	var route, in, port, proto string
 	for i := 0; i < len(args); i++ {
 		switch args[i] {
 		case "route":
 			route = "route "
 		case "in":
-			in = "in on " + args[i+2] + " "
+			in = args[i+2]
 			i += 2
 		case "port":
 			port = args[i+1]
@@ -167,15 +170,14 @@ func canonical(args []string) string {
 			proto = args[i+1]
 			i++
 		case "comment":
-			comment = args[i+1]
+			commentText = args[i+1]
 			i++
 		}
 	}
-	line := route + "allow " + in + port + "/" + proto
-	if comment != "" {
-		line += " comment '" + comment + "'"
+	if in != "" {
+		return route + "allow in on " + in + " to any port " + port + " proto " + proto, commentText
 	}
-	return line
+	return route + "allow " + port + "/" + proto, commentText
 }
 
 func (f *fakeUFW) run(_ context.Context, name string, args ...string) (string, error) {
@@ -235,8 +237,21 @@ func (f *fakeUFW) run(_ context.Context, name string, args ...string) (string, e
 		}
 		return "", errors.New("Could not delete non-existent rule")
 	default:
-		f.rules = append(f.rules, canonical(args))
-		return "Rule added\n", nil
+		rule, note := canonical(args)
+		line := rule
+		if note != "" {
+			line += " comment '" + note + "'"
+		}
+		// As the real ufw does (testdata/ufw-comment-only.txt): a rule differing from one it holds
+		// only in its comment is the same rule, and its comment is replaced.
+		for i, r := range f.rules {
+			if bare, _, _ := strings.Cut(r, " comment '"); bare == rule {
+				f.rules[i] = line
+				return "Rule updated\nRule updated (v6)\n", nil
+			}
+		}
+		f.rules = append(f.rules, line)
+		return "Rule added\nRule added (v6)\n", nil
 	}
 }
 
@@ -276,14 +291,14 @@ func TestAnOpeningIsAddedOnceAndMarkedAsTheMeshs(t *testing.T) {
 	o := opening("adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming", 5671, "everywhere", "incoming", 0)
 
 	action, err := Converge(context.Background(), f.run, o)
-	if err != nil || action != "created" {
+	if err != nil || action.Action != "created" {
 		t.Fatalf("first converge: %q %v", action, err)
 	}
 	if !strings.Contains(f.rules[1], "comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming ") {
 		t.Errorf("the rule is not marked as the mesh's: %v", f.rules)
 	}
 	action, err = Converge(context.Background(), f.run, o)
-	if err != nil || action != "unchanged" {
+	if err != nil || action.Action != "unchanged" {
 		t.Fatalf("second converge: %q %v", action, err)
 	}
 	if f.added() != 1 {
@@ -299,7 +314,7 @@ func TestAnOpeningLostToAReloadIsAddedAgain(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 	f.rules = nil // what a reload that lost the rule leaves
 	action, err := Converge(context.Background(), f.run, o)
-	if err != nil || action != "created" || len(f.rules) != 1 {
+	if err != nil || action.Action != "created" || len(f.rules) != 1 {
 		t.Fatalf("a lost opening was not put back: %q %v %v", action, err, f.rules)
 	}
 }
@@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ func TestAChangedOpeningReplacesOnlyItsOwnRule(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
 	action, err := Converge(context.Background(), f.run, opening("adoption.x", 5671, "mesh", "incoming", 0))
-	if err != nil || action != "updated" {
+	if err != nil || action.Action != "updated" {
 		t.Fatalf("%q %v", action, err)
 	}
 	if len(f.rules) != 3 || f.rules[0] != "allow 22/tcp" || f.rules[1] != "allow 8080/tcp comment 'someone else'" ||
@@ -550,3 +565,119 @@ func TestARefusalOfEveryoneButSomeIsStillAFirewall(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Error("a legacy refusal of all but a range was not counted")
 	}
 }
+
+// Defends novox/hq ADR 0103: an opening a found rule already answers is not added, because ufw
+// takes two rules differing only in their comment for one (testdata/ufw-comment-only.txt).
+
+func TestUfwTakesTheMeshsRuleAndTheOperatorsForOne(t *testing.T) {
+	// The capture: each mesh rule answered "Rule updated" beside the operator's equivalent.
+	raw := captured(t, "ufw-comment-only.txt")
+	if strings.Count(raw, "Rule updated\n") != 3 {
+		t.Fatalf("the capture no longer shows ufw updating an equivalent rule:\n%s", raw)
+	}
+	for _, c := range []struct {
+		operators string
+		o         *declaration.Opening
+	}{
+		{"route allow 8080/tcp", opening("adoption.opening-tcp-8080-forwarded", 20001, "everywhere", "forwarded", 8080)},
+		{"allow 5671/tcp", opening("adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming", 5671, "everywhere", "incoming", 0)},
+		{"allow in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp comment 'operator note'", opening("adoption.opening-tcp-5432-incoming", 5432, "mesh", "incoming", 0)},
+	} {
+		theirs, ok := parseRule(c.operators)
+		mine, ok2 := parseRule(strings.Join(Rule(c.o), " ") + " comment '" + Mark(c.o) + "'")
+		if !ok || !ok2 || !theirs.sameAs(mine) {
+			t.Errorf("%q and the mesh's %v are one rule to ufw, and read as two", c.operators, Rule(c.o))
+		}
+		if !theirs.admits(c.o) {
+			t.Errorf("%q does not read as answering %s", c.operators, c.o.Target())
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestEveryCapturedRuleFormIsRead(t *testing.T) {
+	want := map[string]string{
+		"allow 22/tcp": "tcp 22 in= from=any", "allow 9200": " 9200 in= from=any",
+		"allow from 192.0.2.0/24 to any port 9300 proto tcp": "tcp 9300 in= from=192.0.2.0/24",
+		"allow in on eth0 to any port 9301 proto tcp":        "tcp 9301 in=eth0 from=any",
+		"allow 9500:9510/tcp":                                "tcp 9500:9510 in= from=any",
+		"allow 80,443/tcp":                                   "tcp 80,443 in= from=any",
+		"allow in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp":       "tcp 5432 in=mesh0 from=any",
+		"route allow 8080/tcp":                               "tcp 8080 in= from=any",
+		"allow 9900/tcp":                                     "tcp 9900 in= from=any",
+	}
+	rules, err := added(context.Background(), func(context.Context, string, ...string) (string, error) {
+		return captured(t, "ufw-forms.txt"), nil
+	})
+	if err != nil || len(rules) != 15 {
+		t.Fatalf("read %d rules: %v", len(rules), err)
+	}
+	for _, rule := range rules {
+		r, ok := parseRule(rule)
+		if !ok {
+			t.Errorf("a rule ufw printed was not read: %q", rule)
+			continue
+		}
+		if w, listed := want[rule]; listed {
+			if got := r.proto + " " + r.port + " in=" + r.in + " from=" + r.from; got != w {
+				t.Errorf("%q read as %q, want %q", rule, got, w)
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestAnOpeningAFoundRuleAnswersIsNotAddedAndItsRemovalLeavesTheRule(t *testing.T) {
+	for _, c := range []struct {
+		name, operators string
+		o               *declaration.Opening
+	}{
+		{"forwarded, the same rule", "route allow 8080/tcp", opening("adoption.fwd", 20001, "everywhere", "forwarded", 8080)},
+		{"incoming, the same rule", "allow 5671/tcp", opening("adoption.bus", 5671, "everywhere", "incoming", 0)},
+		{"with a comment of its own", "allow in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp comment 'operator note'", opening("adoption.store", 5432, "mesh", "incoming", 0)},
+		{"broader: from anywhere", "allow 5432/tcp", opening("adoption.store", 5432, "mesh", "incoming", 0)},
+		{"broader: any protocol, a range", "allow 5000:5100", opening("adoption.registry", 5000, "everywhere", "incoming", 0)},
+	} {
+		f := &fakeUFW{installed: true, active: true, rules: []string{"allow 22/tcp", c.operators}}
+		done, err := Converge(context.Background(), f.run, c.o)
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("%s: %v", c.name, err)
+		}
+		if done.SatisfiedBy != c.operators || done.Action != "unchanged" || f.added() != 0 {
+			t.Errorf("%s: %+v, asked %v", c.name, done, f.asked)
+		}
+		if n, err := Remove(context.Background(), f.run, c.o.ID); err != nil || n != 0 {
+			t.Errorf("%s: removing the opening removed %d: %v", c.name, n, err)
+		}
+		if len(f.rules) != 2 || f.rules[1] != c.operators {
+			t.Errorf("%s: the operator's rule did not survive: %v", c.name, f.rules)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestARuleThatDoesNotAnswerTheOpeningLeavesItToBeAdded(t *testing.T) {
+	for _, operators := range []string{
+		"allow from 192.0.2.0/24 to any port 5671 proto tcp", // narrower: from one range
+		"allow in on eth0 to any port 5671 proto tcp",        // narrower: one interface
+		"allow 5671/udp",                         // another protocol
+		"deny 5671/tcp",                          // refuses
+		"route allow 5671/tcp",                   // another path
+		"allow to 192.0.2.1 port 5671 proto tcp", // one address
+	} {
+		f := &fakeUFW{installed: true, active: true, rules: []string{operators}}
+		done, err := Converge(context.Background(), f.run, opening("adoption.bus", 5671, "everywhere", "incoming", 0))
+		if err != nil || done.Action != "created" || done.SatisfiedBy != "" {
+			t.Errorf("%q: %+v %v", operators, done, err)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestAnOpeningWhoseFoundRuleIsGoneIsAddedAgain(t *testing.T) {
+	f := &fakeUFW{installed: true, active: true, rules: []string{"allow 5671/tcp"}}
+	o := opening("adoption.bus", 5671, "everywhere", "incoming", 0)
+	if done, err := Converge(context.Background(), f.run, o); err != nil || done.SatisfiedBy == "" {
+		t.Fatalf("%+v %v", done, err)
+	}
+	f.rules = nil // the operator deleted theirs
+	if done, err := Converge(context.Background(), f.run, o); err != nil || done.Action != "created" {
+		t.Fatalf("the opening was not added once nothing answered it: %+v %v", done, err)
+	}
+}
diff --git a/internal/firewall/testdata/ufw-comment-only.txt b/internal/firewall/testdata/ufw-comment-only.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..13f758c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internal/firewall/testdata/ufw-comment-only.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+$ ufw allow 22/tcp
+Rules updated
+Rules updated (v6)
+$ ufw --force enable
+Firewall is active and enabled on system startup
+$ ufw route allow 8080/tcp
+Rule added
+Rule added (v6)
+$ ufw route allow proto tcp to any port 8080 comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-8080-forwarded 1a2b3c4d'
+Rule updated
+Rule updated (v6)
+$ ufw allow 5671/tcp
+Rule added
+Rule added (v6)
+$ ufw allow proto tcp to any port 5671 comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming 1a2b3c4d'
+Rule updated
+Rule updated (v6)
+$ ufw allow in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp comment 'operator note'
+Rule added
+Rule added (v6)
+$ ufw allow in on mesh0 proto tcp to any port 5432 comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-5432-incoming 1a2b3c4d'
+Rule updated
+Rule updated (v6)
+$ ufw show added
+Added user rules (see 'ufw status' for running firewall):
+ufw allow 22/tcp
+ufw route allow 8080/tcp comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-8080-forwarded 1a2b3c4d'
+ufw allow 5671/tcp comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming 1a2b3c4d'
+ufw allow in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-5432-incoming 1a2b3c4d'
+$ ufw route delete allow 8080/tcp comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-8080-forwarded 1a2b3c4d'
+Rule deleted
+Rule deleted (v6)
+$ ufw show added
+Added user rules (see 'ufw status' for running firewall):
+ufw allow 22/tcp
+ufw allow 5671/tcp comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-5671-incoming 1a2b3c4d'
+ufw allow in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp comment 'mesh-host adoption.opening-tcp-5432-incoming 1a2b3c4d'
diff --git a/internal/firewall/testdata/ufw-forms.txt b/internal/firewall/testdata/ufw-forms.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a39c9c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internal/firewall/testdata/ufw-forms.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+Added user rules (see 'ufw status' for running firewall):
+ufw allow 22/tcp
+ufw allow 9200
+ufw allow from 192.0.2.0/24 to any port 9300 proto tcp
+ufw allow in on eth0 to any port 9301 proto tcp
+ufw deny 9400/tcp
+ufw limit 2222/tcp
+ufw allow 9500:9510/tcp
+ufw route allow in on mesh0 out on docker0 to any port 8082 proto tcp
+ufw allow to 192.0.2.1 port 9600 proto tcp
+ufw allow 9700/udp
+ufw route allow in on mesh0 to any port 8083 proto tcp
+ufw allow 9900/tcp
+ufw allow 80,443/tcp
+ufw allow in on mesh0 to any port 5432 proto tcp
+ufw route allow 8080/tcp