The review removed the guard and the suite still passed. The guard is now provisionerHeld, a placed client held as
its stand-in, rather than any placed client, so one placed and not held that composes no account keeps none stale.
Rows in the held client's table: the client taken out of the node's placement while what runs names the account, read
from the running own composition and from the client's running process, names no account; a placed client whose
process names no user names none. With the guard removed the first three fail; with it reduced to "placed", the last.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
provisionerAccount reads the user of the client's process from this pass's plan, and a client held as its stub (or
carried as it runs) composes no process: on ace, 2026-11-04 01:29 to 01:33, the node's own composition named no
account, the node-engine refused every filled write, and no module was handed (postgres's consumers, restic, power).
A node now carries the account its client runs as (Node.RunningProvisioner: its own composition's account as it runs,
else the user of the client's running process), and a placed client that composes none this pass keeps it. A row holds
the client in the provisioned mesh, both ways: the account stays and restic keeps its filled files; both were lost
before.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
frombus skipped reading the build of every module in Scope.InOwn, while compose.compositions folds such a module only
at no src2: fingerprint: a want at src2: (nats on novox, its have waiting for a yes) composed it from the indexer's
unresolved manifest and built() refused it, "no build has published" its server artifact. compose.Folds is now the one
rule; frombus takes the build in, or keeps the module at its wanted build, exactly where it says the module is not
folded. A row composes spiegel, in InOwn and wanted at src2:, from its build's upstream image; it read the indexer's
manifest before.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
mesh/check checking 30b86ea602a8 on 83e135f10187 | novox/mesh-host#203 in group feat/l3-final
The stub's mark (Manifest.Stubbed) is no field of a manifest's JSON, so an input a node-engine sent the check's
sandbox lost it: node-tools, held by its manifest's verdict, read as a tool runner with no bundle and refused every
module of ace, g14 and shanks for "its build produced 0 bundle(s)". compose.Input now writes its held modules (catalogue
and each node's kept) beside its fields and marks them again on reading; an input from an engine before the mark is
read by its contract, every module Refused names held as its stub. The sandbox composer also says, in the module's
read, why the input's node-engine holds a module the case carries, so the check names the cause, not a rule about the
stub. One subtest round-trips an input holding a refused tool runner, in both shapes; it refused for 0 bundles before.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
ADR 0593 §7: the environment's rendering left mesh-sdk for the node-engine,
so its two integration tests (the POSIX environment sourced twice, and
the service manager reading the systemd rendering) move with it.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0593 §7: the composition is the node-engine's, so its tests hold
what the indexer's judge tests and route-proxy's tests proved by
composing: a bundle's words per machine, a Go bundle's delivery, the
credential form in a handed plan, settings refusals, placeholder and
vault refusals, the session's files, a field set aside composed whole,
route-proxy's manifest composing for a machine, a route endpoint's
machine port in six cases and the plan's route entry end to end. Two
table tests, one subtest per item; route-proxy's manifest is captured
beside the catalogue.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0593 §7: the composer with its refusals leaves mesh-sdk, so mesh-sdk
carries no composition rule. The catalogue functions only the
node-engine's composition reaches (Resolve, Resolution's Compose,
Declaration, DataItems, LeftOut, Rules and the rest, the settings,
placeholder and template refusals, the rendering helpers) are copied
with their tests into internal/compose/resolution; a method of a
mesh-sdk shape becomes a function taking it first. The composition
calls its own copies, and the captured catalogue its tests read lives
here now, shared by mesh-compose's tests.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0593 §6: a composition read from composed-<node> is a record never
applied, and the engine applies only what it composes itself, so no
composition carries a signature and nothing is verified. The agent's
trusted signers, its signed-composition test and the unused signing
helper of the integration bed go, so mesh-sdk can drop SignComposed,
VerifyComposed and Composed.Signature.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
ADR 0593 §1 and §7: compose, its bus reader and runtime reader, takein,
validate, the overlay generator, the composer's run and mesh-compose, and
the judgement of a move leave mesh-sdk for the node-engine's internal
packages, so no other module composes and a change to them rebuilds only
the node-engine. The shapes others read (the composer's request and
verdict, the overlay's names, compositions and answers) stay in mesh-sdk.
The node's grant is now a golden file of what the grants part composes,
since the composer of the bus's user list leaves mesh-sdk too.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
jschoubben