The legacy reader required every path into a chain of refusals to come from a built-in whose policy
accepts. The home server's ban chain hangs off the container runtime's user chain, whose forward
policy the runtime set to DROP, so the machine reported the mesh's own intrusion prevention as a
rule set the mesh did not write. A chain is a ban when every refusal names its sources and the
chain accepts nothing — the rule the nftables side already used. A chain that accepts anything is
still not a ban. Fixture captured from the machine. The citations for the uninstalled front end move
to ADR 0180, which another session's renumber had left pointing at an unrelated record.
The read-back raced the failure: a service manager returns when it has started the process, and a
daemon that refuses its configuration exits a fraction of a second later, so one look saw it alive.
fail2ban took 221ms on the control node and the apply reported "restarted" onto a dead daemon while
both public machines kept no bans at all. The host looks again, after that moment. A unit still
starting is accepted at both looks; a service asked to stop is not waited on.
jschoubben